DO IT!
Wait till December.
I can't wait.
Me too.
Do you promise to leave us the fuck alone when it inevitable fails to materialize though
Topic: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 105. (Read 378996 times)
Wait till December.
Me too.
Do you promise to leave us the fuck alone when it inevitable fails to materialize though
DO IT!
Wait till December.
I can't wait.
Me too.
Your denial is great.
Hahahaha
the 0.1 percenter has spoken about denial.Bitcoin will be forked in December by the industry, like it or not. You shall prepare yourself instead of laughing stupidly.
How many full nodes does "the industry" run?
How much hashing power do they have behind them?
How many bitcoins do they own?
The industry of
Step back, wait until December, and watch. No more arguing is needed at this point, forking will happen like it or not.
DO IT!
I can't wait.
Your denial is great.
Hahahaha
the 0.1 percenter has spoken about denial.Bitcoin will be forked in December by the industry, like it or not. You shall prepare yourself instead of laughing stupidly.
How many full nodes does "the industry" run?
How much hashing power do they have behind them?
How many bitcoins do they own?
The industry of
Step back, wait until December, and watch. No more arguing is needed at this point, forking will happen like it or not.
Your denial is great.
Hahahaha
the 0.1 percenter has spoken about denial.Bitcoin will be forked in December by the industry, like it or not. You shall prepare yourself instead of laughing stupidly.
How many full nodes does "the industry" run?
How much hashing power do they have behind them?
How many bitcoins do they own?
The industry of
Your denial is great.
Hahahaha
the 0.1 percenter has spoken about denial.Bitcoin will be forked in December by the industry, like it or not. You shall prepare yourself instead of laughing stupidly.
Your denial is great.
Hahahaha
the 0.1 percenter has spoken about denial. You mean all of this will become effective before December?
Nothing much will happen in December. Bitcoin is tiny in consumer markets, most transactions are stupid raffles, data records of different kinds based on supercheap txs, and then speculators settling transfers but that is not related to xmas season or anything. Also, in China and most of Asia xmas is minor.
There is no end of the world next month like there wasn't last month, or any other month since the XT fud hardfork attempt took place. XTard desperation is correlated to BTC price
Your denial is great.
Seems like the education/moderation job has been working somewhat: https://archive.is/9iNXf
You mean all of this will become effective before December?
Nothing much will happen in December. Bitcoin is tiny in consumer markets, most transactions are stupid raffles, data records of different kinds based on supercheap txs, and then speculators settling transfers but that is not related to xmas season or anything. Also, in China and most of Asia xmas is minor.
There is no end of the world next month like there wasn't last month, or any other month since the XT fud hardfork attempt took place. XTard desperation is correlated to BTC price
Also nonsense. Version 0.12 will soon be upon us, laying the last of the foundations required to get stuff like Lightning working. CLTV (a piece of the Lightning hubs puzzle) will likely get activated on the network long before the failed XT hard fork. Reality's a bitch.
What to do when you are a gigablock fudster other than sobbing silently?
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
The 'free market' doesn't exist on or for you free-shit-army welfare queens. XT, on the other hand, will likely be giving you 'cash back' to make purchases using a favored app and/or mega-corp wallet service and you idiots will be capitalizing on it without an ounce of concern. Have fun with it. We who need a robust solution will be happily using Bitcoin and/or a reliable proxy in subordinate chains.
With respect to Coinbase and XT, I project a two-pronged attack:
1) legal requirements for corporate vendors to use a 'safe' exchange (e.g., Coinbase) and
2) A bunch of Franklin-style money pumped in from the banking system to jumpstart the 'new and improved' XT-like crypto.
For those of us who plan to XTaint our stash and will be looking for a buyer for the taint-split coins, Coinbase being the chosen entity will be greatly appreciated. It's not like they could reject or de-value the XTainted coins if they are pretending to be on-board with XT after all.
LOL, remember Mike Hearn's proof of passport idea? That all miners need to have a valid passport.
Coinbase can shoot their business in the foot if they try to fork and it goes bad.
If I were on their board I'd be lobbying strongly to sell the company before getting roped into such a risky operation. Of course nobody on the outside would have visibility into such a deal.
As for Mike's passport idea, I almost forgot about that one. It's actually quite a challenge to keep up with all of his bad ideas. Of course 'good' and 'bad' are in the eye of the beholder. His activities have been pretty much universally good from the perspective of the established fiat banking system.
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
LOL Blockstream provides no centralized services to the freemarket. All of their services are invite only. Their only service so far is Liquid.
Lightning isn't theirs, they just pay a guy to code it. Sidechains is their project, but it isn't centralized. And it's open source.
Get your facts right.
The only fact that clearly stand is that they didn't provided any scaling solution in a timely manner of the bitcoin blockchain.
Also nonsense. Version 0.12 will soon be upon us, laying the last of the foundations required to get stuff like Lightning working. It will likely get activated on the network long before the failed XT hard fork. Reality's a bitch.
You mean all of this will become effective before December?
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
The 'free market' doesn't exist on or for you free-shit-army welfare queens. XT, on the other hand, will likely be giving you 'cash back' to make purchases using a favored app and/or mega-corp wallet service and you idiots will be capitalizing on it without an ounce of concern. Have fun with it. We who need a robust solution will be happily using Bitcoin and/or a reliable proxy in subordinate chains.
With respect to Coinbase and XT, I project a two-pronged attack:
1) legal requirements for corporate vendors to use a 'safe' exchange (e.g., Coinbase) and
2) A bunch of Franklin-style money pumped in from the banking system to jumpstart the 'new and improved' XT-like crypto.
For those of us who plan to XTaint our stash and will be looking for a buyer for the taint-split coins, Coinbase being the chosen entity will be greatly appreciated. It's not like they could reject or de-value the XTainted coins if they are pretending to be on-board with XT after all.
The amount of FUD just for pushing back the temporary anti-spam limit is astonishing. It really is.
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
LOL Blockstream provides no centralized services to the freemarket. All of their services are invite only. Their only service so far is Liquid.
Lightning isn't theirs, they just pay a guy to code it. Sidechains is their project, but it isn't centralized. And it's open source.
Get your facts right.
The only fact that clearly stand is that they didn't provided any scaling solution in a timely manner of the bitcoin blockchain.
Also nonsense. Version 0.12 will soon be upon us, laying the last of the foundations required to get stuff like Lightning working. CLTV (a piece of the Lightning hubs puzzle) will likely get activated on the network long before the failed XT hard fork. Reality's a bitch.
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
The 'free market' doesn't exist on or for you free-shit-army welfare queens. XT, on the other hand, will likely be giving you 'cash back' to make purchases using a favored app and/or mega-corp wallet service and you idiots will be capitalizing on it without an ounce of concern. Have fun with it. We who need a robust solution will be happily using Bitcoin and/or a reliable proxy in subordinate chains.
With respect to Coinbase and XT, I project a two-pronged attack:
1) legal requirements for corporate vendors to use a 'safe' exchange (e.g., Coinbase) and
2) A bunch of Franklin-style money pumped in from the banking system to jumpstart the 'new and improved' XT-like crypto.
For those of us who plan to XTaint our stash and will be looking for a buyer for the taint-split coins, Coinbase being the chosen entity will be greatly appreciated. It's not like they could reject or de-value the XTainted coins if they are pretending to be on-board with XT after all.
LOL, remember Mike Hearn's proof of passport idea? That all miners need to have a valid passport.
Coinbase can shoot their business in the foot if they try to fork and it goes bad.
I'll pay someone if they gather a list of all the stupidass ideas Mike has proposed. $20.
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
The 'free market' doesn't exist on or for you free-shit-army welfare queens. XT, on the other hand, will likely be giving you 'cash back' to make purchases using a favored app and/or mega-corp wallet service and you idiots will be capitalizing on it without an ounce of concern. Have fun with it. We who need a robust solution will be happily using Bitcoin and/or a reliable proxy in subordinate chains.
With respect to Coinbase and XT, I project a two-pronged attack:
1) legal requirements for corporate vendors to use a 'safe' exchange (e.g., Coinbase) and
2) A bunch of Franklin-style money pumped in from the banking system to jumpstart the 'new and improved' XT-like crypto.
For those of us who plan to XTaint our stash and will be looking for a buyer for the taint-split coins, Coinbase being the chosen entity will be greatly appreciated. It's not like they could reject or de-value the XTainted coins if they are pretending to be on-board with XT after all.
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
LOL Blockstream provides no centralized services to the freemarket. All of their services are invite only. Their only service so far is Liquid.
Lightning isn't theirs, they just pay a guy to code it. Sidechains is their project, but it isn't centralized. And it's open source.
Get your facts right.
The only fact that clearly stand is that they didn't provided any scaling solution in a timely manner of the bitcoin blockchain. Why would they care anyway? Their business model is to provide centralized for profit solutions, Liquid being the first one. They should have focused on the blockchain instead of Liquid. Now shame on them and their dead-end decision making process on Core implementation.
Yeah, the free market that doesn't want to be forced to use centralized services provided by the for profit Blockstream company. There is no shame to provide the permissionless blockchain to the world. The real shame is on those who want to cripple it for themselves.
LOL Blockstream provides no centralized services to the freemarket. All of their services are invite only. Their only service so far is Liquid.
Lightning isn't theirs, they just pay a guy to code it. Sidechains is their project, but it isn't centralized. And it's open source.
Get your facts right.
Jump to: