Topic: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud) - page 130. (Read 378996 times)
Personally I believe that increasing block size should happen eventually, but only when the network can reach consensus. Perhaps when Bitcoin grows to VISA-size, then we can revisit this issue.
The adoption of big block implementations comes as soon as the stream of transactions is blocked. Which implementations will be ready and which not is not important.
This is how desperation and butthurt look like as of today.
More ad hominem from the usual suspects. If you scroll back a few pages you will see that actual arguments have been made. Read them and decide for your self what you believe, do not be fooled by ad hominen and sophistry.
A bunch of ad hominem pseudo bitcoiners whining about the posts of Peter_R the whole day and night. Unbelievable.
... so this is where the cool kidz are hanging these days?
Seems that way. I feel more at ease and comfortable when I can see my enemy. I see a few of the clueless and probably unconnected dead-enders left, but the core kill-by-bloat folks have gone mighty quit. I think it highly probable that they have formulated or are working on a new strategy.
To be fair, PR's expertise is in deterministic (ie exceedingly predictable), fine-grained in vitro analysis of ~trivially computable, small state-space macroscopic physical interactions.
Can somebody point me to his better non-Bitcoin publications? I found some old papers on robotics and neurosurgery but they were pretty lightweight and he was only a co-author.
I'm now sure how to connect "lightweight" with "robotics and neurosurgery."
But that just makes his Dunning-Kruger all the more insufferable.
More laughing material:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3p1dy5/sinking_deeper_into_the_red_zone_historical_chart/
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/visual-arguments-on-the-blocksize-cap-dev-decentralization-etc.122/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3p1dy5/sinking_deeper_into_the_red_zone_historical_chart/
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/visual-arguments-on-the-blocksize-cap-dev-decentralization-etc.122/
Thank you for shedding light. You are the anti-censor.
You're welcome. Surely knowing the existence of these threads won't hurt anyone (much).
Peter R. Rizun "Peter_tRoll" is a charlatan of the highest degree. I don't remember who first called him that but it's extremely accurate. Charlatan.
I'm gonna go ahead and claim this one
To be fair, PR's expertise is in deterministic (ie exceedingly predictable), fine-grained in vitro analysis of ~trivially computable, small state-space macroscopic physical interactions.
When confronted with a chaotic dynamical system such as Bitcoin (with its socioeconomic and meta overlays), his customary Bat-belt of cognitive tools utterly fails.
Radical things like meta-system transitions are far removed from his Poindexter purview. That's why he can't see the non-linear herd for the spherical cows.
As a Ledger editor, it's useful to have his input because it's a fair representation of Bitcoin's 'disloyal opposition.'
If his
And while we're at it, let's invite Trolfi too!
Man you are coming across as moderate... or is it me that I've got carried away??
Anyway, this man is hard for me to take seriously:
And there I was thinking the objective is actual scalability and not having the block being bigger for their own sake?!
How much more does this man need to prove that he actually doesn't intend to debate anything, but just bombard us with sophomoric propaganda and sensational pictures? I don't even...
To be fair, PR's expertise is in deterministic (ie exceedingly predictable), fine-grained in vitro analysis of ~trivially computable, small state-space macroscopic physical interactions.
Can somebody point me to his better non-Bitcoin publications? I found some old papers on robotics and neurosurgery but they were pretty lightweight and he was only a co-author.
... so this is where the cool kidz are hanging these days?
I respect the work of Peter R and I do not think he is a charlatan.
I support an increase in the blocksize and in the absence of other alternatives I support BIP101.
I support an increase in the blocksize and in the absence of other alternatives I support BIP101.
Yes yes we know
I respect the work of Peter R and I do not think he is a charlatan.
I support an increase in the blocksize and in the absence of other alternatives I support BIP101.
I support an increase in the blocksize and in the absence of other alternatives I support BIP101.
More laughing material:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3p1dy5/sinking_deeper_into_the_red_zone_historical_chart/
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/visual-arguments-on-the-blocksize-cap-dev-decentralization-etc.122/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3p1dy5/sinking_deeper_into_the_red_zone_historical_chart/
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/visual-arguments-on-the-blocksize-cap-dev-decentralization-etc.122/
Thank you for shedding light. You are the anti-censor.
Peter R. Rizun "Peter_tRoll" is a charlatan of the highest degree. I don't remember who first called him that but it's extremely accurate. Charlatan.
I'm gonna go ahead and claim this one
To be fair, PR's expertise is in deterministic (ie exceedingly predictable), fine-grained in vitro analysis of ~trivially computable, small state-space macroscopic physical interactions.
When confronted with a chaotic dynamical system such as Bitcoin (with its socioeconomic and meta overlays), his customary Bat-belt of cognitive tools utterly fails.
Radical things like meta-system transitions are far removed from his Poindexter purview. That's why he can't see the non-linear herd for the spherical cows.
As a Ledger editor, it's useful to have his input because it's a fair representation of Bitcoin's 'disloyal opposition.'
If his
And while we're at it, let's invite Trolfi too!
Achievement unlocked: tiny assemblage of disciples and already divided.
Snapshot: https://archive.is/ybp1m link: https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoin_unlimited/comments/3l1zof/this_concept_is_silly_no_need_to_build_on_xt/
Snapshot: https://archive.is/ybp1m link: https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoin_unlimited/comments/3l1zof/this_concept_is_silly_no_need_to_build_on_xt/
Weeks ago, I noted Team XT was doomed because of its nature as a group composed of members self-selected for fractious tendencies.
Throw Poe's Law into the mix and nothing but drama and lulz result.
I'm going to pull a Peter_tRoll tactic and make a super-flawed economic analogy: the community is applying Gresham's law, spending the ones we want rid off to spin-offs like XT (or even XT forks the very lowliest of them like Peter), while the better ones are kept.
Achievement unlocked: tiny assemblage of disciples and already divided.
Snapshot: https://archive.is/ybp1m link: https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoin_unlimited/comments/3l1zof/this_concept_is_silly_no_need_to_build_on_xt/
Snapshot: https://archive.is/ybp1m link: https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoin_unlimited/comments/3l1zof/this_concept_is_silly_no_need_to_build_on_xt/
Weeks ago, I noted Team XT was doomed because of its nature as a group composed of members self-selected for fractious tendencies.
Throw Poe's Law into the mix and nothing but drama and lulz result.
Peter R. Rizun "Peter_tRoll" is a charlatan of the highest degree. I don't remember who first called him that but it's extremely accurate. Charlatan.
I'm gonna go ahead and claim this one
You were inspired.
Let us remember:
Peter R. Rizun is a charlatan.
Peter__R is a charlatan.
Peter_tRoll
Just so Google continues picking on it
Hopefully soon you'll google Peter R. Rizun and the definition of "charlatan" will come up.
Peter R. Rizun "Peter_tRoll" is a charlatan of the highest degree. I don't remember who first called him that but it's extremely accurate. Charlatan.
I'm gonna go ahead and claim this one
Jump to: