Since yesterday, people have reported to me seeing 403 errors on my new website, BitMixList, a bitcoin mixer list, DEX list, and CoinJoin list and an explanation and chronological history of the above. You reading this may have noticed as well, if you have read
my ANN thread.
I was in the process of finalizing some link placements with some sellers when yesterday afternoon, I discovered that my web host, Hostinger, had suspended access to BitMixList.com. At first I thought, maybe it was because of the way I was updating the onion site. The Tor onion site had always been hosted on my own hardware as a read-only mirror of the clearnet site, and I updated it with an cronjob that periodically mirrored the site. The reason why I did that was because some people had trouble accessing the COM domain from Tor Browser.
So here I was thinking the suspension was DoS (denial of service) related, and any reasonable person probably would've thought that as well. That's why the response I got when talking to a support agent was truly shocking.
ChatGPT Bot: Hi 👋! I'm here to answer your questions, and our team is available if you need extra help. How can I assist you?
Me: Hi, I accidently left a cronjob running that mirrors the contents of my website bitmixlist.com, and it got suspended. I turned it off once I learned about it right now. What should I do to get the site restored?
ChatGPT Bot: I'm sorry to hear that your website got suspended. To get your website restored, you will need to take the following steps:
If you have any further questions or need assistance with the restoration process, please let me know.
Me: This is not helpful. Can you get me in touch with a human?
ChatGPT Bot: Please briefly describe the issue you're experiencing before I connect you with one of our specialists.
Me: My bitmixlist.com website got suspended because on one of my computers, I left a cronjob running that ran "wget" every 5 minutes to mirror the contents of my website (for archival). I need to grt the site restored now that I stopped it
ChatGPT Bot: I’m redirecting you to the Customer Success Team. One of our specialists will join you shortly. They will see our conversation history, so there’s no need to explain the situation again, unless you want to add more details.
Me: Thank you.
Support Agent: Hello there! Thank you for contacting us. I am Yassin, ready to help you 👋
Agent: Please give me a few moments to check everything for you.
Me: thanks, your help is much appreciated Yassin!
Me: Some additional context which I think may help you - I was querying the website from my IP address , and I started it at around 6 or 7 AM UTC time. The website in question was not being used to run any background software, and as far as I can tell, this is all that occurred.
Support Agent: I have checked the reason of your hosting plan suspension is due to abuse: Illegal Activity.
Here is the main point of the suspension:
the website https://bitmixlist.com currently allocated under your hosting is promoting money-laundering services and prohibited entities within jurisdictions of European Union, United States of America and others that adhere to complying with OFAC/SDN, FATF and other international anti-money laundering regulation protocols.
Our company is rooting for safe internet and the best user experience, so any abusive actions might lead to suspension. You can find it in our Terms of Service.
We cannot unsuspend the plan, only the dedicated can unsuspend after verification.
In this case, please forward the relevant documentation to this form.
Fill in this form [FORM FOR DOCUMENTS]
The documentation must include
Business Registration
ID registration
Address Proof
After providing the required information, we will forward the issue to the dedicated team so they can analyze the documentation.
And we will inform via e-mail after the analysis for further clarifications.
If you have any other doubts, I'll be glad to help 🙏
Me: But I'm not a business, just an individual.
Support Agent: I do understand your concern. Our team needs the business registration to unsuspend the website and running at Hostinger in this case.
Me: So what ahould I be doing instead?
Support Agent: At the moment, should you wish to make the website active again you would need to provide the business registration document. If you do not have any, you can register your business to the government and provide the document to the provided form.
Support Agent: I hope it clarifies. Please try this recommendation when you have the opportunity and in case you need more assistance, please let me know on this thread.
Support Agent: We are here 24/7 and will be happy to help! In the meantime, stay safe and take care.I'm sorry to bore you guys with a log monologue, but these guys just accused me of promoting money laundering services and abuse! And it had nothing to do with DoS!
In other words, the website was suspended because they think that bitcoin mixers, Bisq, Localmonero, Robosats, Wasabi, Samourai, JoinMarket are all money laundering services and prohibited entities, that have no real civilian use. The promotion part is also baloney because there were no ads.
And despite being able to clearly see the domain registration information, they insist on me on performing business KYC so that I can host a blog about mixers?
It is ironic this web host has a problem with hosting blogs about mixers, and yet they are perfectly fine with
hosting Tor exit nodes which are perhaps used for real illegal activity.
To add insult to the injury, the website only contained 3 tables with lists of mixers, DEXs, and CoinJoin wallets respectively, and the vast majority of the over-8000 word page was about past history. Not to mention that it also had a disclaimer:
It should be said right now that mixers are an attractive service for criminals who want to launder dirty money. However, I will prefix this by saying some mixers because chain analysis firms like Elliptic have already identified most of the entry and exit points of a lot of mixers. The vast majority of bitcoin mixers do not allow cybercrime and never supported it in the first place. Unfortunately, a small number do, but you won’t find any of them on this bitcoin mixer list. I will never list any illegal mixers here, and the ones that do exist to help Lazarus and Co. can go where they belong: prison.
Even though I myself have advertised mixers, I have never advertised a sanctioned mixer, and they will never be promoted here. Hence, I kindly ask you, the reader, that if you find any illegal service on this bitcoin mixer list, for you to report it to me by the email or Telegram channel linked below. Your vigilance is much appreciated.
In particular, I will not be responsible for what you use the content on this site for. The action of using a bitcoin mixer is supposed to be to help protect your funds, not to help you commit crimes. And yes, I spoke with my hosting provider, who said that publishing cryptocurrency topics (including mixers) is OK.
And this:
Bitcoin mixers, and for that matter, CoinJoin wallets and DEXs, are all abused by criminals, and that is not going to change anytime soon, if ever. But the last thing we need is complete, Orwellian surveillance over our digital transactions. That is why people make bitcoin mixers. Even the wallets that implement blacklisting do so begrudgingly, because the natural evolution of that is to decide who gets to use your service and who can’t. (Like PayPal.)
To me, this is unacceptable, because if they had an issue about any of this, they could've emailed me a notice instead, and I would've happily moved elsewhere. (Read below to see the "permission".)
Also, I have a reason to suspect, that the suspension was done automatically by a robot, and that no staff had actually read the website. I specifically SEO-optimized the website for the keywords "bitcoin mixer" and "bitcoin mixer list"
And also, if it was not automatic, then why were multiple public drafts of the site allowed to exist without notice, but less than 24 hours after I make the ANN thread and a few dozen people visit the website, then it's gets suspended?
Honestly, the above made me shocked, but not upset. What really made me angry was that I had received explicit permission from their compliance team to host a website about mixers, and suddenly they do a 180° as soon as I got traffic. If you don't believe me, here is the email and response I sent and got:
Hi.
I'm a Hostinger customer, but using a different email address.
Section 5, General Rules Of Conduct, of the Universal Terms of Service Agreement (
https://www.hostinger.com/legal/universal-terms-of-service-agreement) says:
3. You will not use this Site or the Services in a manner (as determined by Hostinger in its sole and absolute discretion) that:
* Is illegal, or promotes or encourages illegal activity;
I would like to ask about a possible scenario.
Let's consider the topic of cryptocurrency mixing. In recent days, some websites related to cryptocurrency mixing have been seized. Example:
https://www.fiod.nl/fiod-takes-large-crypto-currency-mixer-off-the-air/This page of FIOD says:
Cryptocurrency mixing
A cryptocurrency mixing service is not necessarily illegal. It is an online service that allows users to disguise the origin and destination of cryptocurrencies. [...] Mixing criminal assets and concealing the origin of criminal funds is a criminal offense.
From this, it can be concluded that some cryptocurrency mixing,websites engage in illegal activity, particularly the ones found on the "darknet". Also, it can be seen that some other cryptocurrency mixing websites are not subject to such illegal activity.
From my understanding of the Universal Terms of Service Agreement, hosting any website that engages in illegal activity is prohibited. However, if somebody were to compile a list of legally operating cryptocurrency mixers, and posted it on a website, this would be allowed by the agreement, correct?
Thanks in advance.
The reply I got (emphasis mine):
Hi there!
I hope you are doing well.
I am providing clarification regarding your e-mail about cryptocurrency.
There's this one statement:
However, if somebody were to compile a list of legally operating cryptocurrency mixers, and posted it on a website, this would be allowed by the agreement, correct?
The answer is yes; your understanding is correct. It is considered acceptable as long as the website in question does not host any form of cryptocurrency transactions or registrations or engage in any activities related to cryptocurrency.
If you have further questions or need additional information, please let me know. I am here to help you out.
Best Regards,
Audris
Hostinger
So as you can see, I clearly received permission to host this kind of content, and most importantly, NOWHERE in their terms of service says that it is ... "illegal" or "abuse" to host content about mixers. So either Hostinger is incompetent, or it has a malicious agenda against privacy, and by extension, Bitcoin privacy.
It's important to note that Hostinger accepts crypto payments, so clearly they are pro-bitcoin, but at the same time, they are also anti-privacy. So to receive this kind of email, only to have your hosting suspended a week later for BS reasons, can only mean that there is a wider censorship campaign going on against bitcoin privacy.
Now I understand why Wasabi started adding blacklisting tech, because in a few years, most of the internet will label you a criminal, a sanctions evader, an OFAC-flouter for supporting bitcoin privacy.
But this kind of enforcement is not done fairly, to everybody, because Google can promote (literally) mixers, even scam mixers, and Section 230 in the USA protects them. But if I blog about mixers, that must be a crime, amirite?
The terms are not even enforced consistently on their own service. For example on my other site, I have a blog post about "Top 5 bitcoin mixers" made last year, but nothing was ever done to it.
To give them some credit, at least they let me download my website data. And the rest of my sites are accessible. Unfortunately, I made the mistake of buying the domain on Hostinger's DNS, and since it's so new, I have to wait until the mandatory 60-day registration period passes before I can transfer it to Porkbun (PS. Porkbun rocks. They never gave me any problems.) So meanwhile, the site has been moved to BitMixList.org, and maybe I'll just let the old domain redirect to this one.
The TOR onion link was not affected by this circus and continues to be hosted my own hardware. For now, the clearnet site is there too. Although long-term, I want to find a new web host for that since my hardware does not have particularly good uptime.
It is a sad world when you are able to host a scam without any repercussions, but you are punished if you share information about privacy.
Someone here warned me that hosting there would be a bad idea. In hindsight, I should've listened to them. (But the suggested Russian hosting as an alternative would not be much better than this).
So, what does this have to do with Bitcointalk?
Well remember the mixer ban? You can't promote a mixer, you apparently can't tell people to go to a specific mixer, and you are allowed to talk about mixers in general. But if you can't have a neutral list of privacy services without some offended person viewing it as promotion, then it is a failure of "being free as possible".
Already if you go on X/Twitter, there are thousands of morons taking issue with Wikipedia. They also take an issue with commonly accepted facts resources. And the result is that we have all these people on a mission to delete knowledge, and keep only the information they like.
There were people here joking about requiring KYC to use the forum, which was ironically the subject of an April Fools joke, but now this is serious, we are actually seeing more and more hosting providers requiring KYC to post stuff that they have an issue with, or just booting you off the network (*cough* AWS).
If we do not take our bitcoin privacy seriously and protect it, we will lose it forever, and we will never get it back.
@theymos: Please consider revising the guidelines to allow "impartial, neutral lists of mixers", because while promoting mixers is obviously a problem, we cannot allow independent coverage of mixers to be censored. News sites like WIRED can do it, even having an interview with Sinbad many months ago, but they do not censor such information and call it "promotion" like these political web hosts.
And I'll say what o_e_l_e_o wrote about the subject again, in my own words: If regulators ban mixers, then they will go after pseudonymous bitcoin addresses and CoinJoin, and soon the only way you'd be able to use Bitcoin is by keeping it on an exchange, surrendering your identity.
Is this how you want people to use the Peer-to-Peer digital currency?
If you are a web host who is interested in hosting BitMixList.org, please send me a PM.
Edit: there have been credible reports that some bitcointalk.org user(s) may have been behind the ruckus. If you are one of those people: I hope one day you appreciate how lucky you are to have the privacy that bitcoin gives you.