One of thousands of shitcoins on the market! Yes. But you can't say no trade. If a whale gets behind the project, it may exist in the market for a long time. Pundix, for example, has been distributing warranty tokens for months.
It should be free to say here, there are many projects, it does not promise anything, it is constantly falling but the area-selling "scammers" are not declared. Moreover, you advertised the most of the project, by talking unnecessary, otherwise nobody would care. İt's would come on the market and remain one of thousands of temporary projects. I do not recommend as holders, but I use all the arguments in the market for trading.
This market is a young market and we have to settle for what we have until the conditions mature. The whole market carries high risk, even binance makes this warning at the end of each announcement. Let him stay away from this market that requires little risk.
Topic: bitcointalk.org is DEATH - page 2. (Read 1015 times)
@wolwoo, I understand your frustration, and being forced to make these arguments in English is probably adding to your frustration. But anger isn't going to help you convince anyone that you are right. In fact most will likely see it as immature, and choose to side against you as a result. It's unappealing, and won't convince anyone.
I tend to agree that tagging someone for wearing Yobit's current signature isn't a good use of the trust system. But I also understand why YOU were tagged and not others. When Yobit tried to peddle their "InvestBox" pump and dump scheme using the forum's members, you defended them. You tried to convince everyone that it's okay to promote what is an obvious scam, designed to look like an investment. By doing so you lost credibility with me, and probably anyone who's seen this type of scam attempt before.
I tend to agree that tagging someone for wearing Yobit's current signature isn't a good use of the trust system. But I also understand why YOU were tagged and not others. When Yobit tried to peddle their "InvestBox" pump and dump scheme using the forum's members, you defended them. You tried to convince everyone that it's okay to promote what is an obvious scam, designed to look like an investment. By doing so you lost credibility with me, and probably anyone who's seen this type of scam attempt before.
10% extra token guaranteed
Would you like to buy some letters from me? I am selling 1000 "A" and each day I will send you 10% (or 100 "A") in your PM. In a year you will have so many "A"s that you will be "A" rich as a fuck.
Yes, I have unlimited supply of "A"s.
You can sell those "A"'s to other users, just forward my PM and pass ownership to them.
You can also withdraw "A"s to paper, if you have printer, of course...
It is 100% safe to buy "A"s from me.
/s
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
There is reference, you know...Question for you. Pump and dump/ponzi/whatever coin/token/numbers/air is ok?
Why have you created flag against this and this then? What is difference, one has stolen content and team without social media profiles, while X10 doesn't have team, whitepaper, roadmap, algo, wallet, nothing except words "it is 100% safe, invest and you will get 10% daily"!
If I start shilling for projects you flagged, would you tag me as a scam promoter or you will say "you are ok, it is ok to share your opinion and shill for scam which I have flagged"?
10% extra token guaranteed
Talk and talk and talk....
If you are authorized, please take us from the forum!
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
There is reference, you know...Question for you. Pump and dump/ponzi/whatever coin/token/numbers/air is ok?
Why have you created flag against this and this then? What is difference, one has stolen content and team without social media profiles, while X10 doesn't have team, whitepaper, roadmap, algo, wallet, nothing except words "it is 100% safe, invest and you will get 10% daily"!
If I start shilling for projects you flagged, would you tag me as a scam promoter or you will say "you are ok, it is ok to share your opinion and shill for scam which I have flagged"?
@Vispillio I do hope that you're being sarcastic? What's become of this shithole? You're even claiming that JollyGood is evil, the kind which can only be compared to the accusations that I receive. Have most of you fucking lost your minds? Not many years ago you as a position of any authority were not allowed to call another position of authority e.g. a scammer without very substantial proof for this claim. Here we are today, you defending somebody who does the following:
Sounds like the system has indeed improved a lot in the last 2 years, now it's like fucking Twitter.
😂 In your personal opinion? I mean, just you guys write, and we'il call it "bravo." Are you waiting here for Yobit's signature to thank hundreds of members for saying "scammers"?Sounds like the system has indeed improved a lot in the last 2 years, now it's like fucking Twitter.
Merit is stored in you.
You have the Trust system
Feedback only for you
Then we fuck off.
wolwoo you are a mother fucker Bustard Merit Abuser. Get lost out of this forum bitch. Merit abuser.
I don't know the OP but I always suggest to write your mind in your own name
Also as for the OP as for the other members, don't go to far with words, they don't support your opinion ......
@Vispillio I do hope that you're being sarcastic? What's become of this shithole? You're even claiming that JollyGood is evil, the kind which can only be compared to the accusations that I receive. Have most of you fucking lost your minds? Not many years ago you as a position of any authority were not allowed to call another position of authority e.g. a scammer without very substantial proof for this claim. Here we are today, you defending somebody who does the following:
Sounds like the system has indeed improved a lot in the last 2 years, now it's like fucking Twitter.
Sounds like the system has indeed improved a lot in the last 2 years, now it's like fucking Twitter.
TL;DR : the tags you got are wrong use of trust system and you alone should not be targeted for campaign promotion.
Agreed, very insightful as are your other comments regarding the current DT system.
I hope @theymos is noticing that the current trust feedback structure is being used to silence dissenting opinions in the forum like some oppressive political weapon...
Once it's established that a member may be voicing unpopular or provocative opinions like Wolwoo here, it almost inevitably follows that some character assasinators like jollygood will emerge from their holes to paint these "renegades" red based on their non-trust related snowflake personal feelings, and the forum goes back to being an echo chamber of mediocre, lukewarm and extremely safe opinions, instead of the open-minded, intellectual platform most rational participants would presumably desire to have...
While Wolwoo clearly is reacting in a counterproductive manner, I think he does have a point regarding signature campaigns. I think the language barrier is not helping him get his point across well either. This kind o rating has become one of those things that people looking to manufacture some crime use when looking for a reason to impugn & try to damage the reputations of users in retribution for whatever the butt hurt of the day is. I also find it interesting no one ever goes after the campaign managers of these signature bounty listings if they are so bad. Funny how those rules get applied in such a targeted manner. This is another one of those petty and subjective infractions that should just be left alone rather than allow it be used to amplify disputes and have it be used as a tool of retribution. Of course if you are the kind of people who have nothing better to do than get all up in people's business than you might be forced to find something else to do. The campaigns should be targeted if anything, not the random users.
Administrators provide translation services. Someone is writing in their own language, we can not tell our problem or wrong.TL;DR : the tags you got are wrong use of trust system and you alone should not be targeted for campaign promotion.
While Wolwoo clearly is reacting in a counterproductive manner, I think he does have a point regarding signature campaigns. I think the language barrier is not helping him get his point across well either. This kind o rating has become one of those things that people looking to manufacture some crime use when looking for a reason to impugn & try to damage the reputations of users in retribution for whatever the butt hurt of the day is. I also find it interesting no one ever goes after the campaign managers of these signature bounty listings if they are so bad. Funny how those rules get applied in such a targeted manner. This is another one of those petty and subjective infractions that should just be left alone rather than allow it be used to amplify disputes and have it be used as a tool of retribution. Of course if you are the kind of people who have nothing better to do than get all up in people's business than you might be forced to find something else to do. The campaigns should be targeted if anything, not the random users.
Administrators provide translation services. Someone is writing in their own language, we can not tell our problem or wrong. 
While Wolwoo clearly is reacting in a counterproductive manner, I think he does have a point regarding signature campaigns. I think the language barrier is not helping him get his point across well either. This kind of rating has become one of those things that people looking to manufacture some crime use when looking for a reason to impugn & try to damage the reputations of users in retribution for whatever the butt hurt of the day is. I also find it interesting no one ever goes after the campaign managers of these signature bounty listings if they are so bad. Funny how those rules get applied in such a targeted manner. This is another one of those petty and subjective infractions that should just be left alone rather than allow it be used to amplify disputes and have it be used as a tool of retribution. Of course if you are the kind of people who have nothing better to do than get all up in people's business than you might be forced to find something else to do. The campaigns should be targeted if anything, not the random users.
It's does not mean by little mistake from some members make this forum already death
So many moderators and members here is very active and solved the problem
This forum is like ours real life, you will never find all of friend or people is kind to you. There must be some shit is scammers or bad to you.
So, thats problem is for ours to solve it. The control of this forum is you, me and everyone in bitcointalk.
Let's do the best what we can do for the future of bitcointalk
Also, you can check this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats
Bitcointalk has grow up since the first made, its mean Bitcointalk is not death
So many moderators and members here is very active and solved the problem
This forum is like ours real life, you will never find all of friend or people is kind to you. There must be some shit is scammers or bad to you.
So, thats problem is for ours to solve it. The control of this forum is you, me and everyone in bitcointalk.
Let's do the best what we can do for the future of bitcointalk
Also, you can check this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats
Bitcointalk has grow up since the first made, its mean Bitcointalk is not death
This is a very sad topic. There's no need to take it further and evolve the "heated discussion" into a full-blown all-out war.
Although the system isn't perfect, just use the forum features provided. No matter which side is anyone on, brigading isn't a good thing.
But... that's just my two cents.
Although the system isn't perfect, just use the forum features provided. No matter which side is anyone on, brigading isn't a good thing.
But... that's just my two cents.
1-I really enjoy the irony of many people who go to Bitcointalk only to say Bitcoin(talk) is dead! If that would be true, why are you here?
2- I called you out on what I consider incorrect use of the Trust system:
3- Feel free to explain why you included dozens of users who don't even have a Trust list and/or never left any feedback:
4- By using reason and arguments, I convinced many DT1 members exclude you, and your DT1 power dropped from +3 (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-12-14_Sat_05.14h/1003533.html) to -6 (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-12-28_Sat_06.13h/1003533.html) within a week.
5- How can you know their judgement belongs on DT2? I know the answer: you don't! The only connection I can think of is that they use the same local board as you do. You may think that's a good enough reason, the rest of the world seems to disagree.
6- While you're at it, maybe you can also explain why you've excluded these users from your Trust list:
7- I can't help but think you did this out of retaliation. Of course, you're completely free to base your Trust list on anything you want. But if you act all emotional and make irrational decisions, don't be surprised if other users distrust your judgement and exclude you from their Trust list. I wouldn't be surprised if you get more exclusions based on this topic.
2- I called you out on what I consider incorrect use of the Trust system:
3- Feel free to explain why you included dozens of users who don't even have a Trust list and/or never left any feedback:
4- By using reason and arguments, I convinced many DT1 members exclude you, and your DT1 power dropped from +3 (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-12-14_Sat_05.14h/1003533.html) to -6 (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-12-28_Sat_06.13h/1003533.html) within a week.
5- How can you know their judgement belongs on DT2? I know the answer: you don't! The only connection I can think of is that they use the same local board as you do. You may think that's a good enough reason, the rest of the world seems to disagree.
6- While you're at it, maybe you can also explain why you've excluded these users from your Trust list:
7- I can't help but think you did this out of retaliation. Of course, you're completely free to base your Trust list on anything you want. But if you act all emotional and make irrational decisions, don't be surprised if other users distrust your judgement and exclude you from their Trust list. I wouldn't be surprised if you get more exclusions based on this topic.
1- maybe someone wants to do a "cardiac massage" and revive the dead.
2- only "your subjective thoughts"
3-many of you are afraid to deal with people like you
4-it is important that you take the trust yourself and then convince it.
5-what could be more natural than distributing trust to people I know locally? Or do you trust people you don't know? there are guys on your list that i don't know
6-I don't have to answer to you, but let me tell you if you're curious. yobit signature attitude and accusations against people .. many of them added to me distrust, according to me "who is more reliable than me"
7-I was so fucked interest of peoples things...
See also another answer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53435215
Let's get to the topic,
Mr Loycev
Why do you support the bastards who put me and the signatories like me under suspicion?
open the title and ban all yobit signers. doesn't your ass eat?
Or is it easier for me to deal with because I'm the only one?
Can't you and your dog-henchmen scare me?
Just because you are having a few disagreements with specific members does not mean that the forum is dead because not everyone here is going to be part of your little wars.
I saw the way you interacted with members during that time you tried to apply to become a merit source and i just knew that it wasn't going to end well for you.
Talking to people as though everyone who disagrees with you is your enemy is not good. What happened to being nice and making friends around here?
I saw the way you interacted with members during that time you tried to apply to become a merit source and i just knew that it wasn't going to end well for you.
Talking to people as though everyone who disagrees with you is your enemy is not good. What happened to being nice and making friends around here?
I really enjoy the irony of many people who go to Bitcointalk only to say Bitcoin(talk) is dead! If that would be true, why are you here?
I called you out on what I consider incorrect use of the Trust system:
Feel free to explain why you included dozens of users who don't even have a Trust list and/or never left any feedback:
While you're at it, maybe you can also explain why you've excluded these users from your Trust list:
I called you out on what I consider incorrect use of the Trust system:
~wolwoo
1. In one week, this DT1-member added 24 users to his Trust list. Most of those users never left any feedback and don't have a custom Trust list. Therefore, they don't belong on DT2, and the user who adds them doesn't belong on DT1.
2. 4 months ago, this user left positive feedback to 16 users, all without reference link. The only thing they seem to have in common is their nationality, just like the users on his Trust list. That shouldn't be a reason to give them positive feedback and/or DT2-powers.
3. This user leaves retaliation feedback.
By using reason and arguments, I convinced many DT1 members to exclude you, and your DT1 power dropped from +3 to -6 within a week.1. In one week, this DT1-member added 24 users to his Trust list. Most of those users never left any feedback and don't have a custom Trust list. Therefore, they don't belong on DT2, and the user who adds them doesn't belong on DT1.
2. 4 months ago, this user left positive feedback to 16 users, all without reference link. The only thing they seem to have in common is their nationality, just like the users on his Trust list. That shouldn't be a reason to give them positive feedback and/or DT2-powers.
3. This user leaves retaliation feedback.
Feel free to explain why you included dozens of users who don't even have a Trust list and/or never left any feedback:
Quote
Trust list for: wolwoo (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1 (-6) 358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-12-28_Sat_06.13h)
Back to index
wolwoo Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (56) 6380 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. RemovedTECSHARE (Trust: +50 / =4 / -2) (DT1! (3) 571 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. RemovedOgNasty (Trust: +96 / =2 / -5) (DT1! (5) 750 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW peloso (Trust: +0 / =1 / -3) (DT1 (-4) 126 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 2run (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Deathwing (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (204 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. xzone (Trust: neutral) (106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Removedyussuf89 (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (30 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. by rallier (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 296 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. teramit (Trust: neutral) (275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. RemovedMorpheWQ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (110 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Lydian (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 148 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ziya1453 (Trust: neutral) (76 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. techman (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. NEW GrinZ (Trust: awaiting update) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. hiburak (Trust: neutral) (29 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. RemovedteeGUMES (Trust: +16 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (8) 444 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. Zz (Trust: neutral) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. Danslip (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. varanvaran (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. mhanbostanci (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. muslol67 (Trust: neutral) (91 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. The Young Turk (Trust: neutral) (11 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. RemovedLoyceV (Trust: +25 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (50) 4446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. Kalemder (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (719 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. cabsav (Trust: neutral) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. DarkStar_ (Trust: +42 / =1 / -0) (1126 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. dannybrown (Trust: neutral) (645 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. BitcoinTurk (Trust: neutral) (309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. bileq (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. Halmater (Trust: neutral) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. ekiller (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (298 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. Muhtaixa (Trust: neutral) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. tekno (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. sammys (Trust: neutral) (25 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. Aceeakell (Trust: neutral) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. Bitcoin-Turkiye (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (20 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. ophyrim (Trust: neutral) (137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. TaliskerDarkStorm (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. onurgozupek (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. otto_diesel (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (2) 417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. bobita (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 399 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. Vispilio (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. enfarktus (Trust: neutral) (36 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. Blacknavy (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (803 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 452 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. PHI1618 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 858 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. lossnet (Trust: neutral) (167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. gumusi (Trust: neutral) (39 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. jopen (Trust: neutral) (167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. vycl87 (Trust: neutral) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. El-Cezeri (Trust: neutral) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. gospodin (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. SkyLords (Trust: neutral) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. trendcoin (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (187 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. anonymous3x (Trust: neutral) (87 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. Hovarda (Trust: neutral) (14 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. cryptobaro (Trust: neutral) (152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. Bthd (Trust: neutral) (154 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. Cryptorianx (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (121 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. ismend (Trust: neutral) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. NEW forumalacali (Trust: awaiting update) (64 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. kartepe (Trust: neutral) (80 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. kriptobaron (Trust: neutral) (6 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. KursatAelf (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. mandown (Trust: neutral) (35 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. Tom Bombadil (Trust: neutral) (110 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. Lachrymose (Trust: neutral) (175 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
How can you know their judgement belongs on DT2? I know the answer: you don't! The only connection I can think of is that they use the same local board as you do. You may think that's a good enough reason, the rest of the world seems to disagree.Back to index
wolwoo Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +32 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (56) 6380 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Removed
2. Removed
2. NEW peloso (Trust: +0 / =1 / -3) (
3. 2run (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (118 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Deathwing (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (204 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. EFS (Trust: +12 / =1 / -1) (193 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. xzone (Trust: neutral) (106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Removed
7. by rallier (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 296 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. teramit (Trust: neutral) (275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Removed
9. Lydian (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 148 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ziya1453 (Trust: neutral) (76 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. techman (Trust: neutral) (19 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. NEW GrinZ (Trust: awaiting update) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. hiburak (Trust: neutral) (29 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. Removed
14. Zz (Trust: neutral) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. Danslip (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. varanvaran (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. mhanbostanci (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. muslol67 (Trust: neutral) (91 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. The Young Turk (Trust: neutral) (11 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. Removed
20. Kalemder (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (719 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. cabsav (Trust: neutral) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. DarkStar_ (Trust: +42 / =1 / -0) (1126 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. dannybrown (Trust: neutral) (645 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. BitcoinTurk (Trust: neutral) (309 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. bileq (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. Halmater (Trust: neutral) (130 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. ekiller (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (298 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. Muhtaixa (Trust: neutral) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. tekno (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. sammys (Trust: neutral) (25 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. Aceeakell (Trust: neutral) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. Bitcoin-Turkiye (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (20 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. ophyrim (Trust: neutral) (137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. TaliskerDarkStorm (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. onurgozupek (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. otto_diesel (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (2) 417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. bobita (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 399 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. Vispilio (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (3) 727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. enfarktus (Trust: neutral) (36 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. Blacknavy (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (803 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. AlyattesLydia (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 452 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. PHI1618 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (5) 858 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. lossnet (Trust: neutral) (167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. gumusi (Trust: neutral) (39 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. jopen (Trust: neutral) (167 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. vycl87 (Trust: neutral) (333 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. El-Cezeri (Trust: neutral) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. gospodin (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. SkyLords (Trust: neutral) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. trendcoin (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (187 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. anonymous3x (Trust: neutral) (87 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. Hovarda (Trust: neutral) (14 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. cryptobaro (Trust: neutral) (152 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. Bthd (Trust: neutral) (154 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. Cryptorianx (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (121 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. ismend (Trust: neutral) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. NEW forumalacali (Trust: awaiting update) (64 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. kartepe (Trust: neutral) (80 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. kriptobaron (Trust: neutral) (6 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. KursatAelf (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. mandown (Trust: neutral) (35 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. Tom Bombadil (Trust: neutral) (110 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. Lachrymose (Trust: neutral) (175 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
While you're at it, maybe you can also explain why you've excluded these users from your Trust list:
Quote
Trust list for: wolwoo (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1 (-6) 358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-12-28_Sat_06.13h)
Back to index
wolwoo Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (829 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW ~Lauda (Trust: +34 / =4 / -1) (1233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =5 / -1) (DT1 (-11) 308 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW ~2double0 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. NEW ~stompix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (768 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~suchmoon (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (3443 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. NEW ~examplens (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (97 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. NEW ~tmfp (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 586 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. NEW ~Quickseller (Trust: # +16 / =6 / -19) (774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. NEW ~LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1382 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. NEW ~psycodad (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. NEW ~LoyceV (Trust: +25 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (50) 4446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. NEW ~The Pharmacist (Trust: +27 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2230 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. NEW ~JaredKaragen (Trust: neutral) (123 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. NEW ~TryNinja (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (1) 1206 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. NEW ~marlboroza (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (1236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. NEW ~IconFirm (Trust: +3 / =2 / -1) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. NEW ~blurryeyed (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. NEW ~JollyGood (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. NEW ~Steamtyme (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (1439 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. NEW ~o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3055 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. ~rehberistan (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. NEW ~morvillz7z (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1088 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. NEW ~Coolcryptovator (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1042 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. ~DireWolfM14 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
I can't help but think you did this out of retaliation. Of course, you're completely free to base your Trust list on anything you want. But if you act all emotional and make irrational decisions, don't be surprised if other users distrust your judgement and exclude you from their Trust list. I wouldn't be surprised if you get more exclusions based on this topic. Back to index
wolwoo Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (829 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW ~Lauda (Trust: +34 / =4 / -1) (1233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =5 / -1) (
4. NEW ~2double0 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. NEW ~stompix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (768 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~suchmoon (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (3443 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. NEW ~examplens (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (97 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. NEW ~tmfp (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 586 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. NEW ~Quickseller (Trust: # +16 / =6 / -19) (774 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. NEW ~LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1382 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. NEW ~psycodad (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. NEW ~LoyceV (Trust: +25 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (50) 4446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. NEW ~The Pharmacist (Trust: +27 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (25) 2230 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. NEW ~JaredKaragen (Trust: neutral) (123 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. NEW ~TryNinja (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (1) 1206 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. NEW ~marlboroza (Trust: +15 / =1 / -0) (1236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. NEW ~IconFirm (Trust: +3 / =2 / -1) (49 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. NEW ~blurryeyed (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (15 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. NEW ~JollyGood (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. NEW ~Steamtyme (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (1439 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. NEW ~o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 3055 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. ~rehberistan (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. NEW ~morvillz7z (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1088 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. NEW ~Coolcryptovator (Trust: +13 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1042 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. ~DireWolfM14 (Trust: +16 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
@JollyGood, I think it is not appropriate use of red trust to tag campaign participants. I agree it looks very shay for someone on DT1 to promote an exchange with an infinite number of complaints never solved. I even understand your intentions which is unabling the signature promotion around. But still it is not a decent reason to tag someone with red trust as an more larger group of users are already engaged in similar signature promotion. Let alone administration handle it as theymos did it last time by banning all the signatures, that could be the best way possible.
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
still hundreds of members of the "scammer" You are in the faith. Prohibit it!
I don't understand, do not yobit other signatories to me? They've come and they are two insults.
why do you insult yourself? who are these people, able to insult you (and me).
Can't a legal exchange be promoted?
a man calls hundreds of people "scammers" and gets applause. "scammers people" are not responding. "holy corleone family" has established authority in the forum. There is such a shitty situation.
@JollyGood, I think it is not appropriate use of red trust to tag campaign participants. I agree it looks very shay for someone on DT1 to promote an exchange with an infinite number of complaints never solved. I even understand your intentions which is unabling the signature promotion around. But still it is not a decent reason to tag someone with red trust as an more larger group of users are already engaged in similar signature promotion. Let alone administration handle it as theymos did it last time by banning all the signatures, that could be the best way possible.
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
Same can be said to @marlboroza if they are willing to consider.
wolwoo you are a mother fucker Bustard Merit Abuser. Get lost out of this forum bitch. Merit abuser.
write your real identity son of a bitch
I risk my 2.5 year account. my only account
You and others like you disgust me.
--------------
good luck 🍀 with the thread.
good luck 🍀 with the thread.
the truth is always alone, does not need support.
I didn't expect to see a merit or lick team.
Jump to: