Bitcointalk.org supports illegal ponzi schemes - page 5.

freedoge.co

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 506

Quote from: Lauda on May 19, 2016, 02:57:26 AM

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:32:26 AM

thanks god, because i believe i see jetwin signature under your posts.

That's right.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:32:26 AM

i gave evidence of my case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/refbitcoincom-bitcoin-mlm-network-get-paid-32-btc-from-each-referral-1418002
this is the post i earned red trust from this cryptodevil guy:

So your evidence of many "false ratings" is the post that you've received a negative rating for? How did you not previously know that supporting ponzi's would most likely end up with you receiving a negative rating?

Also, why did you make this case now since you received your rating on: 2016-04-03 ?

ok i was fine with that neg feedback because it's was a bullshit, but now i can't join any sig. campaign so i decided to try it here, but as i see no help here.

and about refbitcoin game, it's a game and it's under gambling->investment based games so yes i joined and tried it. If forum doesn't support such games, is it a big problem to wipe that board entirely? I think NO. So i understand it as the forum and stuff support ponzis TOO.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:32:26 AM

thanks god, because i believe i see jetwin signature under your posts.

That's right.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:32:26 AM

i gave evidence of my case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/refbitcoincom-bitcoin-mlm-network-get-paid-32-btc-from-each-referral-1418002
this is the post i earned red trust from this cryptodevil guy:

So your evidence of many "false ratings" is the post that you've received a negative rating for? How did you not previously know that supporting ponzi's would most likely end up with you receiving a negative rating?

Also, why did you make this case now since you received your rating on: 2016-04-03 ?

freedoge.co

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 506

Quote from: Lauda on May 19, 2016, 02:27:54 AM

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:25:00 AM

so this is your opinion on everyone involved in signature campaigns? they are all signature spammers?

Not really, no.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:25:00 AM

just investigate or only look at those numbers of feedbacks he has given up to date, how many alts he has created to do the same thing.

That's similar to me making a claim that X is a murdered, and telling you to investigate because "I'm right". You're supposed to provide this 'evidence' yourself (feedback, alts and whatnot).

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:25:00 AM

he's given red trust to people who only replied in gambling, investment based games section

There's nothing wrong with fighting ponzi's.

thanks god, because i believe i see jetwin signature under your posts.

i gave evidence of my case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/refbitcoincom-bitcoin-mlm-network-get-paid-32-btc-from-each-referral-1418002

this is the post i earned red trust from this cryptodevil guy:

Quote from: ?? on ??

registered, this is a good system and it's a worth of five bucks, better than gambling

edit, just found the banners

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:25:00 AM

so this is your opinion on everyone involved in signature campaigns? they are all signature spammers?

Not really, no.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:25:00 AM

just investigate or only look at those numbers of feedbacks he has given up to date, how many alts he has created to do the same thing.

That's similar to me making a claim that X is a murdered, and telling you to investigate because "I'm right". You're supposed to provide this 'evidence' yourself (feedback, alts and whatnot).

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:25:00 AM

he's given red trust to people who only replied in gambling, investment based games section

There's nothing wrong with fighting ponzi's.

freedoge.co

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 506

Quote from: Lauda on May 19, 2016, 02:19:25 AM

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 12:52:54 AM

causing me and others money loss from signature campaigns.

Have you seriously just created a thread demanding someone's removal from DT due to a financial loss related to signature campaigns? You have just indirectly admitted that you're a signature spammer. This is not how you build up your case.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 12:52:54 AM

he has given many false red trust ratings,

Stating this without evidence is pointless.

Quote from: Kozan on May 19, 2016, 01:11:33 AM

He is only fighting against the ponzi scammers, and that should be supported.

It's not like OP provided us with examples of "false ratings" either.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:18:16 AM

I can't believe someone is doing such thing in a free time, all he does is giving a red trust and spam the forum.

No.

so this is your opinion on everyone involved in signature campaigns? they are all signature spammers?

just investigate or only look at those numbers of feedbacks he has given up to date, how many alts he has created to do the same thing.

he's given red trust to people who only replied in gambling, investment based games section

thats unbelievable you are ok with that.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 12:52:54 AM

causing me and others money loss from signature campaigns.

Have you seriously just created a thread demanding someone's removal from DT due to a financial loss related to signature campaigns? You have just indirectly admitted that you're a signature spammer. This is not how you build up your case.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 12:52:54 AM

he has given many false red trust ratings,

Stating this without evidence is pointless.

Quote from: Kozan on May 19, 2016, 01:11:33 AM

He is only fighting against the ponzi scammers, and that should be supported.

It's not like OP provided us with examples of "false ratings" either.

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 02:18:16 AM

I can't believe someone is doing such thing in a free time, all he does is giving a red trust and spam the forum.

No.

freedoge.co

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 506

Quote from: Quartx on May 19, 2016, 01:57:18 AM

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 01:24:57 AM

Quote from: Quartx on May 19, 2016, 01:13:25 AM

Mind telling us the false trust rating? If you mean a ponzi owner vouching for another ponzi, kindly f off. I have never seen cryptodevil wrongly putting his big red psa

i got negative feedback only for this message: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/refbitcoincom-bitcoin-mlm-network-get-paid-32-btc-from-each-referral-1418002

please explain this to me, before you f out

In my book, mlm websites are all ponzis, there isn't a single mlm bitcoin site that isn't a ponzi. I wonder what else that site does other than simply referrals. Too bad you got a neg for that, many others have gotten negs for things more legit than that. Do you really think the site will last long? Support for potential ponzis warrant a neg from certain DT members, trust is not moderated. Next time if you want to try something that seems like a ponzi, simply do not reply,even if it might work for you, late members will not benefit, that itself is the very definition of a ponzi.
That wasn't an example of false trust at all. Look at my untrusted neg feedback from an actual ponzi owner, that is the real false trust

for me it is the false red trust from cryptodevil, you don't need to defend him, in my opinion he is only naive victim of ponzi doing his revenge, got out of control. I can't believe someone is doing such thing in a free time, all he does is giving a red trust and spam the forum.

edit. And plus making alts and giving the same feedback from multiple accounts. Crazy.

Quartx

hero member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 504

Becoming legend, but I took merit to the knee :(

Quote from: freedoge.co on May 19, 2016, 01:24:57 AM

Quote from: Quartx on May 19, 2016, 01:13:25 AM

Mind telling us the false trust rating? If you mean a ponzi owner vouching for another ponzi, kindly f off. I have never seen cryptodevil wrongly putting his big red psa

i got negative feedback only for this message: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/refbitcoincom-bitcoin-mlm-network-get-paid-32-btc-from-each-referral-1418002

please explain this to me, before you f out

In my book, mlm websites are all ponzis, there isn't a single mlm bitcoin site that isn't a ponzi. I wonder what else that site does other than simply referrals. Too bad you got a neg for that, many others have gotten negs for things more legit than that. Do you really think the site will last long? Support for potential ponzis warrant a neg from certain DT members, trust is not moderated. Next time if you want to try something that seems like a ponzi, simply do not reply,even if it might work for you, late members will not benefit, that itself is the very definition of a ponzi.
That wasn't an example of false trust at all. Look at my untrusted neg feedback from an actual ponzi owner, that is the real false trust

freedoge.co

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 506

Quote from: Quartx on May 19, 2016, 01:13:25 AM

Mind telling us the false trust rating? If you mean a ponzi owner vouching for another ponzi, kindly f off. I have never seen cryptodevil wrongly putting his big red psa

i got negative feedback only for this message: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/refbitcoincom-bitcoin-mlm-network-get-paid-32-btc-from-each-referral-1418002

please explain this to me, before you f out

Goms

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

What is a ponzi website?

Quartx

hero member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 504

Becoming legend, but I took merit to the knee :(

Mind telling us the false trust rating? If you mean a ponzi owner vouching for another ponzi, kindly f off. I have never seen cryptodevil wrongly putting his big red psa

Kozan

hero member

Activity: 520

Merit: 500

He is only fighting against the ponzi scammers, and that should be supported.

Ponzis will only take your bitcoins and you will be scammed when it collapse, so he his right about the negative feedbacks.

If the guys not like to get negged they should not post or support any ponzi website and all good!

freedoge.co

hero member

Activity: 909

Merit: 506

Check the Investor-based games board: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=207.0

it's full of ponzi schemes and bitcointalk.org is ignoring it.

Their lame explanation is that it would be more work for moderators to keep the whole forum clean, even that argument is a proof that this forum supports such illegal games.

old:
Hi, could someone remove cryptodevil https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptodevil-224980 from default trust, he has given many false red trust ratings, causing me and others money loss from signature campaigns.

Topic: Bitcointalk.org supports illegal ponzi schemes - page 5. (Read 3794 times)