Unfortunately, both coinmarketcap and bittrex are listed at bitcredits...
It should be Bitcredit. :/ Not a huge deal.
Wondering why there is no market cap listed, only current price?
They don't show the total coins mined
Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 191. (Read 284545 times)
Unfortunately, both coinmarketcap and bittrex are listed at bitcredits...
It should be Bitcredit. :/ Not a huge deal.
Wondering why there is no market cap listed, only current price?
They don't show the total coins mined
Unfortunately, both coinmarketcap and bittrex are listed at bitcredits...
It should be Bitcredit. :/ Not a huge deal.
Wondering why there is no market cap listed, only current price?
So .. we landed on http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcredits/ 
BANK NODES...BANK NODES....BANK NODES....BANK NODES
YOU CAN DO IT!!!
if the nodes are ready tomorrow then we will see a CRAVE like rise today
God damn it. Trying to get a BN on the downlow. This is turning into a reallife 24 trying to beat the deadline, and I think the dev is Jack Bauer. So, what does that make me?
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
if the nodes are ready tomorrow then we will see a CRAVE like rise today
God damn it. Trying to get a BN on the downlow. This is turning into a reallife 24 trying to beat the deadline, and I think the dev is Jack Bauer. So, what does that make me?
if the nodes are ready tomorrow then we will see a CRAVE like rise today
nice ill wait to hear back from dev before I purchase any..
he seems to be running into some trouble so well see how it works out
he seems to be running into some trouble so well see how it works out
how many coins are there?
Around 7 million currently in circulation (6 million additional coins held in secure escrow)
BTW, how do you guys feel about reversible transactions?
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
YES. That would be revolutionary.
Revolutionary is exactly what that would be!
how many coins are there?
BTW, how do you guys feel about reversible transactions?
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
This sounds extremely promising. Love the idea. Continually impressive work. mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
BTW, how do you guys feel about reversible transactions?
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
YES. That would be revolutionary.
BTW, how do you guys feel about reversible transactions?
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
mainstream tech leaders like B.G have mentioned that the fact that transactions are not reversible makes it difficult to apply in major finance.
I think that our architecture can allow for a different kind of recourse. But it means i will have to develop an impartial method of dispute resolution. Reliance on third party arbitration would then be limited to cases that cannot be dealt with using software eg a party has a dispute over completion of a bounty or something like that. Likely BN owners would use an in built consensus system that would designate the arbitrator at random.
Anyway, just some things to think about.
As usual... one irritating error left. It's like there's a little demon in QT that loves to taunt me.
I'm going to upload the changes now, then spend some time reading QT reference manual and try to figure it out.
For those who know their QT :-
I'm going to upload the changes now, then spend some time reading QT reference manual and try to figure it out.
For those who know their QT :-
Code:
qt/messagemodel.cpp: In member function ‘virtual QVariant InvoiceItemTableModel::data(const QModelIndex&, int) const’:
qt/messagemodel.cpp:1176:49: error: conversion from ‘int64_t {aka long int}’ to ‘QVariant’ is ambiguous
return rec->quantity * rec->price;
^
qt/messagemodel.cpp:1176:42: note: candidates are:
return rec->quantity * rec->price;
^
In file included from /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qabstractitemmodel.h:45:0,
from /usr/include/qt4/QtGui/qabstractitemview.h:46,
from /usr/include/qt4/QtGui/qheaderview.h:45,
from /usr/include/qt4/QtGui/QHeaderView:1,
from qt/guiutil.h:11,
from qt/messagemodel.cpp:1:
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:429:12: note: QVariant::QVariant(void*)
inline QVariant(void *) { Q_ASSERT(false); }
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:429:12: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int64_t {aka long int}’ to ‘void*’
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:219:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(Qt::GlobalColor)
QVariant(Qt::GlobalColor color);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:219:5: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int64_t {aka long int}’ to ‘Qt::GlobalColor’
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:186:36: note: QVariant::QVariant(const char*)
QT_ASCII_CAST_WARN_CONSTRUCTOR QVariant(const char *str);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:186:36: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int64_t {aka long int}’ to ‘const char*’
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:184:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(float)
QVariant(float f) { d.is_null = false; d.type = QMetaType::Float; d.data.f = f; }
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:183:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(double)
QVariant(double d);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:182:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(bool)
QVariant(bool b);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:181:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(qulonglong)
QVariant(qulonglong ull);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:180:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(qlonglong)
QVariant(qlonglong ll);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:179:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(uint)
QVariant(uint ui);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:178:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(int)
QVariant(int i);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:169:5: note: QVariant::QVariant(QVariant::Type)
QVariant(Type type);
^
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qvariant.h:169:5: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘int64_t {aka long int}’ to ‘QVariant::Type’
Makefile:5096: recipe for target 'qt/qt_libbitcreditqt_a-messagemodel.o' failed
so we can expect the release to be delayed?
I still have time. I'll tell you this evening.
frustrated as hell.
its cool keep us posted
almost there, just a few errors left caused by the differences in BTC types vs QT types.
Keep at it. We appreciate your hard work. This project will be EPIC.
so we can expect the release to be delayed?
I still have time. I'll tell you this evening.
frustrated as hell.
its cool keep us posted
almost there, just a few errors left caused by the differences in BTC types vs QT types.
so we can expect the release to be delayed?
I still have time. I'll tell you this evening.
frustrated as hell.
its cool keep us posted
so we can expect the release to be delayed?
I still have time. I'll tell you this evening.
frustrated as hell.
so we can expect the release to be delayed?
Jump to: