◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 231.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: SockPuppetAccount on January 10, 2015, 09:10:22 PM

Awesome that EmpoEx agreed to hold onto the ICO coins. Have you talked to them about possibly hosting the ICO there? 2 options I see are running the ICO the way you had planned, maybe since EmpoEx is involved now anyway see if someone representing the exchange can control the BTC address to escrow those funds as well. It would probably make distribution of the bitcredits easy too as investors could just make an EmpoEx account and EmpoEx could distribute the shares of the coins right through the exchange. Or just throw all the coins up in a sell wall on EmpoEx for a week. Problem there is what price to put them at and what to do with the unsold coins. I think your method of running the ICO is superior than that option.

See, now I know you aren't a scammer as I am dying to flick a BTC at you for some of the ICO coins and you are wasting all this time worrying about silly details like "development" and "fixing bugs".

I think ICO discussion should start in a week when i have

1) Fixed the Ui, and 2) You guys have tested the statistics engine and maybe a rudimentary loan request.

Hopefully they'll agree to do the ICO my way, that leaves no coins at all.

A lot of the code is always in flux, but i'd like to prove my willingness and ability to deliver.

Hahaha silly details indeed, i just wish there was more development talent around, some small issues would be taken care of without need to divert from Core development.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: acarterczyz on January 10, 2015, 08:39:56 PM

Thanks. I'm going to hold off on building the linux wallet for now. I mainly wanted to build it so I could mine on linux.

I'm noticing some issues with the windows wallet.
- I can't find my wallet address anywhere.
- A lot of the buttons are blacked out. Trying to send BCR is difficult, as I need to press buttons to send and it's blacked out. (ex: Click the send button and look at the top right.)
- The Show/Hide button, when pressed, hides the wallet but I can't figure out how to unhide my wallet.
- When is the bank going to be available?
- Block hash rate in the block crawler is always 0.
- Check block 6448 in the block crawler and notice the "Value Out" field states it was 500,000,000 BCR when decrypted. Outputs/Inputs are fail.

This is about all I could find with the wallet, other than the occasional crashes (which I think is a Windows 8.1 issue).

Yes i noticed this and will put up a lot of those fixes within a day.

The Bank, well, i am wary of setting an exact date so let me make a set of promises

1) in one week or two the beta Statistics Engine will be in the standard wallet
2) in two weeks or three the URI system will be tested by a limited group
3) in a month, i would have a demonstration transactions

These are not concrete dates, I like room to operate freely and explore.

SockPuppetAccount

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

MiG Messenger - earn while chatting

Awesome that EmpoEx agreed to hold onto the ICO coins. Have you talked to them about possibly hosting the ICO there? 2 options I see are running the ICO the way you had planned, maybe since EmpoEx is involved now anyway see if someone representing the exchange can control the BTC address to escrow those funds as well. It would probably make distribution of the bitcredits easy too as investors could just make an EmpoEx account and EmpoEx could distribute the shares of the coins right through the exchange. Or just throw all the coins up in a sell wall on EmpoEx for a week. Problem there is what price to put them at and what to do with the unsold coins. I think your method of running the ICO is superior than that option.

See, now I know you aren't a scammer as I am dying to flick a BTC at you for some of the ICO coins and you are wasting all this time worrying about silly details like "development" and "fixing bugs".

acarterczyz

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Thanks. I'm going to hold off on building the linux wallet for now. I mainly wanted to build it so I could mine on linux.

I'm noticing some issues with the windows wallet.
- I can't find my wallet address anywhere.
- A lot of the buttons are blacked out. Trying to send BCR is difficult, as I need to press buttons to send and it's blacked out. (ex: Click the send button and look at the top right.)
- The Show/Hide button, when pressed, hides the wallet but I can't figure out how to unhide my wallet.
- When is the bank going to be available?
- Block hash rate in the block crawler is always 0.
- Check block 6448 in the block crawler and notice the "Value Out" field states it was 500,000,000 BCR when decrypted. Outputs/Inputs are fail.

This is about all I could find with the wallet, other than the occasional crashes (which I think is a Windows 8.1 issue).

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Happy to announce that we have been listed on :-

As agreed in the thread, the ICO coins have been placed in the trust of EmpoEx in a an escrow account, please note that this is Escrow, not the actual ICO.

Much love for the EmpoEx team for reaching out and helping us out. You can always watch the coins movement by importing the address in your client (it supports watch only addresses) or by manually searching using the RPC console in your client.

EmpoEx Escrow Address :- 5qH4yHaaaRuX1qKCZdUHXNJdesssNQcUct

jasemoney

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1008

Forget-about-it

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 10, 2015, 02:03:57 PM

Fixed the Op and took down ICO stuff, however i do not intend to hide the existence of the coins, hopefully once EmpoEx has setup a wallet and we make the address and transaction public. Maybe bittrex would hold a % as well, i am trying to get a hold of their representative.

sorry whats the plan with the ico, are you going to burn the coins, or have an ico sometime in the future..

acarterczyz

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 10, 2015, 02:57:19 PM

Quote from: acarterczyz on January 10, 2015, 02:50:27 PM

This is the next error I'm getting. Is it named differently?

Code:

/src$ cd ~/bicreditsnew/src/bitcreditd /usr/local/bin
-bash: cd: /home/ubuntu/bicreditsnew/src/bitcreditd: No such file or directory

1) make sure your prompt looks like this

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew

then paste this

Code:

chmod +x autogen.sh && cd share/ && chmod +x genbuild.sh && cd .. && cd src/leveldb && chmod +x build_detect_platform && cd ../.. && ./autogen.sh &&  ./configure --disable-tests --enable-upnp-default  && make

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew$ chmod +x autogen.sh && cd share/ && chmod +x genbuild.sh && cd .. && cd src/leveldb && chmod +x build_detect_platform && cd ../.. && ./autogen.sh &&  ./configure --disable-tests --enable-upnp-default  && make
aclocal: warning: couldn't open directory 'build-aux/m4': No such file or directory
Makefile.am:3: error: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined
Makefile.am:3:   The usual way to define 'LIBTOOL' is to add 'LT_INIT'
Makefile.am:3:   to 'configure.ac' and run 'aclocal' and 'autoconf' again.
Makefile.am:3:   If 'LT_INIT' is in 'configure.ac', make sure
Makefile.am:3:   its definition is in aclocal's search path.
Makefile.am:45: warning: source file 'src/secp256k1.c' is in a subdirectory,
Makefile.am:45: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
automake: warning: possible forward-incompatibility.
automake: At least a source file is in a subdirectory, but the 'subdir-objects'
automake: automake option hasn't been enabled.  For now, the corresponding output
automake: object file(s) will be placed in the top-level directory.  However,
automake: this behaviour will change in future Automake versions: they will
automake: unconditionally cause object files to be placed in the same subdirectory
automake: of the corresponding sources.
automake: You are advised to start using 'subdir-objects' option throughout your
automake: project, to avoid future incompatibilities.
Makefile.am:62: warning: source file 'src/bench_inv.c' is in a subdirectory,
Makefile.am:62: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
Makefile.am:56: warning: source file 'src/bench_recover.c' is in a subdirectory,
Makefile.am:56: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
Makefile.am:59: warning: source file 'src/bench_sign.c' is in a subdirectory,
Makefile.am:59: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
Makefile.am:53: warning: source file 'src/bench_verify.c' is in a subdirectory,
Makefile.am:53: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
Makefile.am:70: warning: source file 'src/tests.c' is in a subdirectory,
Makefile.am:70: but option 'subdir-objects' is disabled
autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: acarterczyz on January 10, 2015, 02:50:27 PM

This is the next error I'm getting. Is it named differently?

Code:

/src$ cd ~/bicreditsnew/src/bitcreditd /usr/local/bin
-bash: cd: /home/ubuntu/bicreditsnew/src/bitcreditd: No such file or directory

1) make sure your prompt looks like this

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew

then paste this

Code:

chmod +x autogen.sh && cd share/ && chmod +x genbuild.sh && cd .. && cd src/leveldb && chmod +x build_detect_platform && cd ../.. && ./autogen.sh &&  ./configure --disable-tests --enable-upnp-default  && make

acarterczyz

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

This is the next error I'm getting. Is it named differently?

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew/src$ cd ~/bicreditsnew/src/bitcreditd /usr/local/bin
-bash: cd: /home/ubuntu/bicreditsnew/src/bitcreditd: No such file or directory

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Interesting discussion going on about decentralization and current existing models of PoS. this will have direct influence when i start implementing interest rates much later on.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: acarterczyz on January 10, 2015, 02:15:35 PM

I'm trying to make the linux wallet and I'm getting the following error:

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew/src$  make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-
make: makefile.unix: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `makefile.unix'.  Stop.

Sorry I'm a bit of a noob at this. Undecided

That is the old way of doing things, likely coins whose source is older than 2 years.

try the following

cd into ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew

then copy paste this :-

Code:

chmod +x autogen.sh && cd share/ && chmod +x genbuild.sh && cd .. && cd src/leveldb && chmod +x build_detect_platform && cd ../.. && ./autogen.sh &&  ./configure --disable-tests --enable-upnp-default  && make

if you are using a version on BDB that is > 4.8 add this at after the upnp flag

Code:

--with-incompatible-bdb

acarterczyz

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I'm trying to make the linux wallet and I'm getting the following error:

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-19-32:~/bicreditsnew/src$  make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-
make: makefile.unix: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `makefile.unix'.  Stop.

Sorry I'm a bit of a noob at this. Undecided

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Fixed the Op and took down ICO stuff, however i do not intend to hide the existence of the coins, hopefully once EmpoEx has setup a wallet and we make the address and transaction public. Maybe bittrex would hold a % as well, i am trying to get a hold of their representative.

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: NoobKidOnTheBlock on January 10, 2015, 01:52:15 PM

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 10, 2015, 01:50:19 PM

Quote from: NoobKidOnTheBlock on January 10, 2015, 01:39:44 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Check it out, you lot need to come to http://weeklyponzi.com/ its way better than CD and you can 5 times your investments just keep receiving and placeing them again at weeklyponzi im in profit for over 5 btc now! 100 btc gets you 30 btc in some hours. You can also watch the blockchain of the wallet paying out

JUST DON'T GAMBLE ON THE LAST DAY OF THIS WEEK AS YOU WILL BE LIKELY TO LOSE

K I'm reporting you buddy because this is like the 5th thread that I've posted in that you have posted this spamming link. Now I hate to have to do this but we are here to discuss the coins not promote "Give me your coins and I'll give you double back Ponzi schemes" Cheers

lucky it's self moderated.

Well sorry to lose my cool there but that's like 10 threads now where I've seen him post the exact same thing in each one lol So how is BCR coming along my friend? Hope all is working out for you as you had planned

Not all of it but for the most part all is well , there is almost a weekly update and i keep discovering and improving.

currently trying to do three things at the same tie so maybe i'll hire someone once off to do a port that i need. That leaves me more time to have a version of the stats engine out by Wednesday for distribution.

NoobKidOnTheBlock

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

FLY DONATION ADDRESS IN SIGNATURE

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 10, 2015, 01:52:51 PM

Quote from: NoobKidOnTheBlock on January 10, 2015, 01:42:25 PM

Quote from: shojayxt on January 10, 2015, 01:40:42 PM

Dude, it's a little late for an ICO. People are already mining and the coin is on an exchange.

The best thing you could do would be to take a premine and burn the rest of the coins.

If you wanted to do an ICO then you should never have allowed mining to start. And besides the coin is already being traded on an exchange. How do you have an ICO for a coin that is already being actively traded? It won't work.

Quote from: bitcreditscc on December 24, 2014, 12:51:38 AM

one of the most important issues with changing key instruments is that it must propagate in the network properly. i will make a decision by the end of he day and have the client out before 14:00 GMT.

this is very delicate and i wish to avoid multiple forking, as a result, all old clients will be disconnected the moment we switch to the new retargeting scheme.

it has been reported that the changes i want to make , while safer than introducing kgw or digishield, will likely result in wild swings in difficulty, as a result the gap needs to be smaller and the adjustments more fluid.

at block 8000 the reward is meant to skyrocket to 250 per block, a few people have told me it's too high, that instead i should increase the halving period but reduce the reward to 100. this will increase the value of the coins held by those who are mining now, while keeping an ample money supply.

i see the merits in the argument, but i'd like to hear from the miners themselves.

That is too high

Ya I have to agree if you are going from 50 coins per block to 250 coins per block that really hurts the people who have been here since the beginning with you so I would just keep it the same or minimum double it

Cheers

I'll update the OP, the 250 thing was scratched since it would hurt current supporters and miners.

Congrats man you have learned the #1 thing when building a coin and that is to make sure you keep your community happy with your development of the coin because that in turn will lead more people to investing in your coin

Cheers

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: NoobKidOnTheBlock on January 10, 2015, 01:42:25 PM

Quote from: shojayxt on January 10, 2015, 01:40:42 PM

Dude, it's a little late for an ICO. People are already mining and the coin is on an exchange.

The best thing you could do would be to take a premine and burn the rest of the coins.

If you wanted to do an ICO then you should never have allowed mining to start. And besides the coin is already being traded on an exchange. How do you have an ICO for a coin that is already being actively traded? It won't work.

Quote from: bitcreditscc on December 24, 2014, 12:51:38 AM

one of the most important issues with changing key instruments is that it must propagate in the network properly. i will make a decision by the end of he day and have the client out before 14:00 GMT.

this is very delicate and i wish to avoid multiple forking, as a result, all old clients will be disconnected the moment we switch to the new retargeting scheme.

it has been reported that the changes i want to make , while safer than introducing kgw or digishield, will likely result in wild swings in difficulty, as a result the gap needs to be smaller and the adjustments more fluid.

at block 8000 the reward is meant to skyrocket to 250 per block, a few people have told me it's too high, that instead i should increase the halving period but reduce the reward to 100. this will increase the value of the coins held by those who are mining now, while keeping an ample money supply.

i see the merits in the argument, but i'd like to hear from the miners themselves.

That is too high

Ya I have to agree if you are going from 50 coins per block to 250 coins per block that really hurts the people who have been here since the beginning with you so I would just keep it the same or minimum double it

Cheers

I'll update the OP, the 250 thing was scratched since it would hurt current supporters and miners.

NoobKidOnTheBlock

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

FLY DONATION ADDRESS IN SIGNATURE

Quote from: bitcreditscc on January 10, 2015, 01:50:19 PM

Quote from: NoobKidOnTheBlock on January 10, 2015, 01:39:44 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Check it out, you lot need to come to http://weeklyponzi.com/ its way better than CD and you can 5 times your investments just keep receiving and placeing them again at weeklyponzi im in profit for over 5 btc now! 100 btc gets you 30 btc in some hours. You can also watch the blockchain of the wallet paying out

JUST DON'T GAMBLE ON THE LAST DAY OF THIS WEEK AS YOU WILL BE LIKELY TO LOSE

K I'm reporting you buddy because this is like the 5th thread that I've posted in that you have posted this spamming link. Now I hate to have to do this but we are here to discuss the coins not promote "Give me your coins and I'll give you double back Ponzi schemes" Cheers

lucky it's self moderated.

Well sorry to lose my cool there but that's like 10 threads now where I've seen him post the exact same thing in each one lol So how is BCR coming along my friend? Hope all is working out for you as you had planned

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: shojayxt on January 10, 2015, 01:40:42 PM

Dude, it's a little late for an ICO. People are already mining and the coin is on an exchange.

The best thing you could do would be to take a premine and burn the rest of the coins.

If you wanted to do an ICO then you should never have allowed mining to start. And besides the coin is already being traded on an exchange. How do you have an ICO for a coin that is already being actively traded? It won't work.

Quote from: bitcreditscc on December 24, 2014, 12:51:38 AM

one of the most important issues with changing key instruments is that it must propagate in the network properly. i will make a decision by the end of he day and have the client out before 14:00 GMT.

this is very delicate and i wish to avoid multiple forking, as a result, all old clients will be disconnected the moment we switch to the new retargeting scheme.

it has been reported that the changes i want to make , while safer than introducing kgw or digishield, will likely result in wild swings in difficulty, as a result the gap needs to be smaller and the adjustments more fluid.

at block 8000 the reward is meant to skyrocket to 250 per block, a few people have told me it's too high, that instead i should increase the halving period but reduce the reward to 100. this will increase the value of the coins held by those who are mining now, while keeping an ample money supply.

i see the merits in the argument, but i'd like to hear from the miners themselves.

That is too high

That was already addressed , sorry i should have pointed it out. the current reward of 50 is the max. I'll fix the Op

bitcreditscc

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: NoobKidOnTheBlock on January 10, 2015, 01:39:44 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Check it out, you lot need to come to http://weeklyponzi.com/ its way better than CD and you can 5 times your investments just keep receiving and placeing them again at weeklyponzi im in profit for over 5 btc now! 100 btc gets you 30 btc in some hours. You can also watch the blockchain of the wallet paying out

JUST DON'T GAMBLE ON THE LAST DAY OF THIS WEEK AS YOU WILL BE LIKELY TO LOSE

K I'm reporting you buddy because this is like the 5th thread that I've posted in that you have posted this spamming link. Now I hate to have to do this but we are here to discuss the coins not promote "Give me your coins and I'll give you double back Ponzi schemes" Cheers

lucky it's self moderated.

Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 231. (Read 284530 times)