Pages:
Author

Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 51. (Read 284550 times)

newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
try adding this node :-91.230.123.101
Thanks, but it is not the missing node. I got enough other nodes connected.
It is the error that blocks the sync.
lg t.
hero member
Activity: 501
Merit: 503
try adding this node :-91.230.123.101
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Hi together,
I tried to sync a new client, but get stuck at this point:
Code:
2015-11-05 10:38:10 UpdateTip: new best=0002746187aeb4aa7e229ebe27f500843f8858658b40436106fd34878abae642  height=236432  log2_work=35.943277  tx=24523
0  date=2015-11-04 16:06:23 progress=0.991353  cache=50606
2015-11-05 10:38:11 UpdateTip: new best=0000ede34e6921527e79b462ba2df67b6087f8f39bb9ee21cbe1cd8ad8eecb5d  height=236433  log2_work=35.943277  tx=24523
1  date=2015-11-04 16:06:35 progress=0.991354  cache=50607
2015-11-05 10:38:11 ERROR: ConnectBlock(): banknode miningkey invalid
2015-11-05 10:38:11 Misbehaving: 91.230.123.11:8877 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED
2015-11-05 10:38:11 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0002093181003c6baccefa037daff9471eaffb1757a745ed7933e762a30730c3  height=236434  log2_work=35.943
277  date=2015-11-04 16:10:09
2015-11-05 10:38:11 InvalidChainFound:  current best=0000ede34e6921527e79b462ba2df67b6087f8f39bb9ee21cbe1cd8ad8eecb5d  height=236433  log2_work=35.943
277  date=2015-11-04 16:06:35
2015-11-05 10:38:11 ERROR: ConnectTip(): ConnectBlock 0002093181003c6baccefa037daff9471eaffb1757a745ed7933e762a30730c3 failed
2015-11-05 10:38:11 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0002093181003c6baccefa037daff9471eaffb1757a745ed7933e762a30730c3  height=236434  log2_work=35.943
277  date=2015-11-04 16:10:09
2015-11-05 10:38:11 InvalidChainFound:  current best=0000ede34e6921527e79b462ba2df67b6087f8f39bb9ee21cbe1cd8ad8eecb5d  height=236433  log2_work=35.943
277  date=2015-11-04 16:06:35

I tried with both last versions: 30.17.6-64bit and 30.17.8-rc2 and each with a new wallet.
Same result with both versions.

Any suggestions to resolve this?
lg t.
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 510
Yeah, overhaul, more like a whole new one. I made offers of huge amounts of BCr for people to take up jobs but none came forward.

...
Might have some ideas, tomorrow I will hit you up on Skype about the ANN overhaul.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
hello boiis whats up with the 10m pre-mine? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5rNLyjgNKnbD4J3w6wWZqC9RcJgts3oZeS.htm

why isnt any of this in the ann post Huh i can see that 6m is locked away? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5qH4yHaaaRuX1qKCZdUHXNJdesssNQcUct.htm but what happened to the remaining 4m? anyone?
could anyone please explain what this is about Huh im invested in bitcredit but it worries me

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12611151
this answers most of your question.
The 4 mil seems to have been used as working capital over the past year.
thanks for the links this explains a lot!! Cheesy i sincerely believe that this should be put in the ann asap! not mentioning the premine will scare away investors if they find out about the premine themselves... just saying - be careful and be transparent!
it is a great idea to be transparent. I think the announce needs an overhaul too, but who has time! Since there has been a hard press forward to get the wallet working with the mining rules in place and bids/payouts working right all efforts have revolved around getting that finalized, along with the lending platform into beta. it would be great to have a historical writeup of the releases/ideas in timeline form, an updated announce, and a howto for wallet/features, as well as a new roadmap with updated timeframe.

Yeah, overhaul, more like a whole new one. I made offers of huge amounts of BCr for people to take up jobs but none came forward. As for roadmap/timeframes.... i like to stay clear of those as there is no telling how long/quickly it takes for me to learn new things, i dislike having people pushing me to produce something based on "timeframe".
Id like to step up for the wallet one, basically ill take what i wrote up as positive/negative and rewrite it to inject the planned features/process flow for anything nonfunctional/incomplete in a formal "how to use the wallet" along with photos for a writeup. problem is im in the middle of moving so I havent had much time.

also Chain ID sounds very interesting. Im interested to hear what other banknode holders feel about the potential need to burn 50k and offer services against it. It could cause a disconnect between people who want tom mine without having to babysit the setgenerate true command, and people who want to have a banknode for payouts. Also Im assuming loans would eventually come straight form the banknode escrow? or will we be able to provide loan-able BCR as a banknode that comes off the top of it, say i have 200k BCR, 50k is in  a banknode and I would want to allow someone to loan 100k, either i need 2 banknodes? or i need 100k on top of the banknode.?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
hello boiis whats up with the 10m pre-mine? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5rNLyjgNKnbD4J3w6wWZqC9RcJgts3oZeS.htm

why isnt any of this in the ann post Huh i can see that 6m is locked away? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5qH4yHaaaRuX1qKCZdUHXNJdesssNQcUct.htm but what happened to the remaining 4m? anyone?
could anyone please explain what this is about Huh im invested in bitcredit but it worries me

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12611151
this answers most of your question.
The 4 mil seems to have been used as working capital over the past year.
thanks for the links this explains a lot!! Cheesy i sincerely believe that this should be put in the ann asap! not mentioning the premine will scare away investors if they find out about the premine themselves... just saying - be careful and be transparent!
it is a great idea to be transparent. I think the announce needs an overhaul too, but who has time! Since there has been a hard press forward to get the wallet working with the mining rules in place and bids/payouts working right all efforts have revolved around getting that finalized, along with the lending platform into beta. it would be great to have a historical writeup of the releases/ideas in timeline form, an updated announce, and a howto for wallet/features, as well as a new roadmap with updated timeframe.

Yeah, overhaul, more like a whole new one. I made offers of huge amounts of BCr for people to take up jobs but none came forward. As for roadmap/timeframes.... i like to stay clear of those as there is no telling how long/quickly it takes for me to learn new things, i dislike having people pushing me to produce something based on "timeframe".
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
hello boiis whats up with the 10m pre-mine? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5rNLyjgNKnbD4J3w6wWZqC9RcJgts3oZeS.htm

why isnt any of this in the ann post Huh i can see that 6m is locked away? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5qH4yHaaaRuX1qKCZdUHXNJdesssNQcUct.htm but what happened to the remaining 4m? anyone?
could anyone please explain what this is about Huh im invested in bitcredit but it worries me

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12611151
this answers most of your question.
The 4 mil seems to have been used as working capital over the past year.
thanks for the links this explains a lot!! Cheesy i sincerely believe that this should be put in the ann asap! not mentioning the premine will scare away investors if they find out about the premine themselves... just saying - be careful and be transparent!
it is a great idea to be transparent. I think the announce needs an overhaul too, but who has time! Since there has been a hard press forward to get the wallet working with the mining rules in place and bids/payouts working right all efforts have revolved around getting that finalized, along with the lending platform into beta. it would be great to have a historical writeup of the releases/ideas in timeline form, an updated announce, and a howto for wallet/features, as well as a new roadmap with updated timeframe.
hero member
Activity: 501
Merit: 503
I think a 25 block limit is more reasonable @bitcreditscc... there is always the risk that too high a limit would freeze up the chain if able miners went offline... or do you have a work  around?
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
hello boiis whats up with the 10m pre-mine? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5rNLyjgNKnbD4J3w6wWZqC9RcJgts3oZeS.htm

why isnt any of this in the ann post Huh i can see that 6m is locked away? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5qH4yHaaaRuX1qKCZdUHXNJdesssNQcUct.htm but what happened to the remaining 4m? anyone?
could anyone please explain what this is about Huh im invested in bitcredit but it worries me

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12611151
this answers most of your question.
The 4 mil seems to have been used as working capital over the past year.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
LOL.....dev is actually the first to verifiably solve the

1) Pool Domination
2) Hardware Arms Race

problems
Where have you seen/read that? That sure is interesting..

Yeah that's old news. By requiring a minimum balance and imposing a X block limit i have discouraged pools as well as competitive mining.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Well, i'm almost ready with a !!database only rc

Some words and thoughts :- maybe the beginning of a white paper finally?  Shocked

Ask the Bitcoin devs and they'll encourage you to use an address only once...hell they'll say an address does not really exist on the chain (technically true). This is all well and good in a system designed to maintain total pseudo anonymity, use of different addresses should make it harder to tell who is who and what they are doing with their money. Many people argue about what spirit of cyptocurrency development is about....ranging from privacy , to challenging the existing banking systems/ financial systems. My thoughts on Bitcredit (not really important) are fairly straightforward , I am pushing the development of a digital foundation of a decentralized/distributed financial ecosystem that will offer not only alternatives to existing systems, but also make possible new and interesting ways to conduct online commerce.

Thus i'd like to start by arguing some points :-

Finances are what drives the world's economies, people perform tasks and receive compensation in the form of money, cash or digital. Sometimes immediately available funds may not be sufficient for intended uses, thus we approach banks and ask for loans. The bank performs highly detailed background checks, not just on financial history but personal information as well, in an effort to build a profile which results in a "score". This score determines the risk to the bank of you defaulting on a loan. If they find that you are likely to default, no money for you. This in essence is fair play, you wouldn't arbitrarily lend money to someone you don't know without a certain level of surety that they will pay you back. The blockchain is a whole different type of animal, on a typical bitcoin based blockchain users are identified by the "address" they use to send/receive payments and it can be changed instantly... resulting in no real positive identification.

I would like to expand in the opposite direction to the recommendation of the current Bitcoin dev team. Rather than encouraging disposing of "addresses", I am developing a system that rewards useage of a single "address", which for our purposes can be referred to as ChainID.

ChainID

Transactions are recorded in the blockchain, every time you use your funds/transfer them, a record is created. Essentially this means we can mine a lot of numeric data about a ChainID, from number of transactions to how much you are likely to spend in a single transaction. This , if there has been enough activity can result in a fairly detailed income/expenditure profile spanning the existence of the ChainID.

Qualitative data is almost non-existant on the blockchain, this is because typically noone uses personally identifiable data on the chain, encrypted or otherwise. I approach this problem by analysing aspects of associated ChainIDs, building a detailed profile of known associates and their trust ratings, the higher the trust/credit ratings of know associates...the higher yours will go. I also incorporate a system of voted trust, each user can "vouch" for another by endorsing them with a vote, please note a ChainID can only vouch once for another ChainID, all subsequent votes are not calculated. As with the first system, trust/credit rating of the voting ChainID will be considered, so voting with low or zero trust is pointless.

Information on a ChainID is served on demand or optionally triggered by a automatic parsing of a specially formatted message. Each service provider will have available to them a set of parameters they can set for minimum threshold ratings required to receive a service from them, so along with relevant data service provider may get a recommendation or set auto responses.

These are some of the ideas driving the development train.....feel free to discuss , nitpick.

I have to do the following:-

1) A standard wallet may only hold a single address (need to find a way to enforce this) or figure an alternative
2) BNs are no longer moveable.... you literally burn the coins to enable a BN, (or another CRYPTOGRAPHIC solution)
3) Batch processing of trust and credit tables once an hour
4) many more things big and small
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 510
LOL.....dev is actually the first to verifiably solve the

1) Pool Domination
2) Hardware Arms Race

problems
Where have you seen/read that? That sure is interesting..
hero member
Activity: 501
Merit: 503
LOL.....dev is actually the first to verifiably solve the

1) Pool Domination
2) Hardware Arms Race

problems
hero member
Activity: 501
Merit: 503
looks like people selling to get on the bitcoin train, meanwhile my desktop has been off (moving) how have the bid payouts been going?

Not surprised , which is why i have been trying to find ways to divorce bitcoin.

I haven't looked at my boxes recently so not sure about payouts. The upcoming update should resolve the issue of miners waiting until payout blocks to mine and snipe the block.

New branch is pretty heavy on the I/O , i'm guessing you'll fix that soon? QT literally froze.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
looks like people selling to get on the bitcoin train, meanwhile my desktop has been off (moving) how have the bid payouts been going?

Not surprised , which is why i have been trying to find ways to divorce bitcoin.

I haven't looked at my boxes recently so not sure about payouts. The upcoming update should resolve the issue of miners waiting until payout blocks to mine and snipe the block.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
Posted raw quote of problems to github for easier tracking.

There is slack...it's just empty  Tongue

I asked about slack at least 2 times, it's empty because nobody knows that it already is, so where ? Invitation only ? Kill me but there's no link to it in this topic. Wink

After asking for something few times you just give up ...

I will setup auto invites soon. It's just something in the long line of to-dos

legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
looks like people selling to get on the bitcoin train, meanwhile my desktop has been off (moving) how have the bid payouts been going?
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
Posted raw quote of problems to github for easier tracking.

There is slack...it's just empty  Tongue

I asked about slack at least 2 times, it's empty because nobody knows that it already is, so where ? Invitation only ? Kill me but there's no link to it in this topic. Wink

After asking for something few times you just give up ...
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Formal labels using 'bank' is likely to be a regulated term or the network might be considered trying to pass off as a 'bank' which might cause problems.

Maybe some creative renaming in a future release.  

Thanks, very true, a lot of things here need renaming and legal assessment for various territories.
first impressions would be bitcredit finance on the blockchain, lending escrow etc, and call the banknodes financenodes or agentnodes
Financenodes sounds quite nice! Smiley

That does sound good, but financialNode sounds better.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
Posted raw quote of problems to github for easier tracking.

There is slack...it's just empty  Tongue
I think a lot of people here are unfamiliar with github aside from being able to yell "zomg its not on github scam!"
If github problem tracking is working, i know theres 3-5 devs intermittently helping bitcredits with branch changes and "pull?" requests, then no need to make a push for community to congregate elsewhere.
Worst part about bitcointalk is that once the page flips to the next 20 posts, its rare anyone will read back unless theyre quoting somehting they saw before. If we got together on another medium like irc, or turned up the intensity on the slack that could be good for when things are tuned up enough to make a community expanding / media push movement.
if slacks not completely private feel free to post an invite link here hack__

edit: I guess the push by Bitcreditscc to have someone draft up some media kit on how to run the wallet and what BCR is about would go a long way to answering the most asked questions. Shame I dont have enough time this week :/
Pages:
Jump to: