Topic: ◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈ - page 95. (Read 284526 times)

We are now at ~205263

Every 900 blocks there is supeblock :

205200
206100
207000
207900
208800
209700
210600
...
THANKS MAN for the info..

great on chainz, i also have mined some 4.05 inside the qt-wallet, guess you guys should already know.
and what is the 10.3500 is for?
should i also see the bid ? don't see it.

great stuff, am all in.

We are now at ~205263

Every 900 blocks there is supeblock :

205200
206100
207000
207900
208800
209700
210600
...

Chainz is finally working but is not in sync and not accurate or I'm missing something, I don't see any of my 4.05 fees on chainz but I see them in wallet.


@bitcreditscc

You were right about hyped coins, now they are dying in painful death, but they lack of healthy community, so this abandoned seems to be a better choice.

Great work and I am still impressed that after some problems bitcredit is still a strong coin, seems that nothing can kill it .

Just to grumble like I always do, it would be really helpful to establish some official update schema (I know You don't have a time for this ...)  

update number
mandatory or optional
fixes list

Windows wallet problems seems to be a small drop in a sea of thing You already did and intend to do but are really pivotal in way to reaching broader mass adoption.


@ thelonecrouton

You are saying it doesn't matter if my BN will have Intel i7 cores, Atom or Pi ? Hashrate matters or not.

EDIT:

BN mining is a great, unconventional but simple idea, hope it would be ballanced a little better or some options would be given, without it there will be no additional hashrate.

I get what you are saying but Dash might be not  a good example, it has highly centralized mining, right now coinmine.pl has 61 % of all hashrate https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/#!extraction which could be effect of many users unconsciously mining with their rigs, having trojan installed from pirated GTAV or another infected game https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12360005



@cisahasa

Declare yourself clearly, you want to help, fuck up BCR blockchain (I don't believe in coincidence) , seeking for some attention or just want to to be ignored like now.

Thanks dragos_bdi ... testing... EDIT: And I think it works now.. =) creating a new bank node to be sure all the process is acceptable... will give news soon...

EDIT2: Created a new banknode successfully... but it was a crap of an assle time spent on Windows 10, making BAU work on the wallet... there is something wrong with the client.. that after version 0.30.16.X started to take huge amounts of time to respond... can someone confirm this? In any case good work! =) It looks like that every time there is a new block ... it enter a some sort of long working code... waiting for some threads... maybe (I see no responding... indicating waiting for Interrupts signals or high intensive loops...).

guys is there a superblock somewhere cause i just got some.. 205200 something.

mining with 1 core and still one wallet. the second one still syncin.

blocks" : 205220,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000140,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : 2,
"networkhashps" : 28,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false,
"chain" : "main",
"generate" : true,
"hashespermin" : 4

just downloaded the last wallet.. .installing now.

0.30.17.1-bids2.7z https://mega.nz/#!blMmFT4T!ntxc0txKhJnXaK_38CBNtQOZAJhGM-PhAe1m3c8qqXk

wait for a new build based off the current git.

BCR key ... ? I have just issued... a new one.. to be sure again
Windows Client 0.30.17.1 (bitcreditd.exe or the qt version is the same thing)
Chain..
        "height" : 205124,
        "hash" : "0024b8557ab2c3d414da544734d8e7a9e739999ec8ef45345646d82a0948979b",
        "branchlen" : 0,
        "status" : "active"

yeah, i'd also like to hear more arguments against it / for it

@ 6 million with maybe a 1-2 months bidding window....i'm not sure about the dumping, it's possible, but also depends on how much is bid.... we are guaranteeing a % of coins proportional to each addresses' bids. In the event that there is little interest, yes there would be that danger , but i suspect some enterprising BCR holders would buy small chunks of the cheap bidding coins and soak up the even cheaper credits....i definitely would

Hmm you truly make an excellent case for it. No current opposition from this community member. Cons: possible eventual spite from the minorities die-hard believers from those coins too. We would also inherit the troll and fud squads... Would like to hear more cons but currently the pros outweigh the cons by far IMO.

.....



**EDIT***

CON: potential (very probable) BCR dump from the newly acquired coins by other coin communities............. redeemable coins for BCR could be inflated to try and mitigate that though

Well, in essence that depends on the status of that coin, there are coins that are literally dying off due to scandals, lack of developers(pump dump and run) , or just lack direction. After stringent assessment, we would have a list of viable coins, after which when the bidding is done, we allocate them BCR. Their bids would in turn be dumped on the hold outs who chose not to join us...so no... those coins would not gain value...rather depending on % interest and buy support, they would lose value.

Many of these have active members who actually contribute to the discussions and in some cases offer related services that accept the coin. The idea is to turn that attention here, because if we expand the community the pool of possible bidders expands...and the backed price has more potential to rise. We would gain 1) more member (hopefully productive ones) 2) value off the BTC made from dumping on the hold outs 3) larger pool of potential BN owners and bidders.

Most of them would gain  1) steady community (strength in numbers) 2) active continuous development 3) Direction 4) multiple revenue streams from within our system and 5) Access to all the tech and ideas we plunder from the coins who opt in(if there actually was anything useful beyond cloning).

This is a community decision and i'd really appreciate input fro as any as possible.

most developers/communities are cooperation shy. I'll give it a try though. Put up your debug.log on pastebin and i'll take a look.

This has been an issue for a while, it is the result of a/some race condition(s) @ start-up. I intend to follow these up ASAP, it had been slated for this weekend, but i ended up using Saturday to put out fires.

For now just keep trying to restart, mine starts after two or three tries. Ubuntu/ *nix starts immediately though.not sure why.

Very interesting idea, it would surely expand the BCR community. Just replying without much thought but the first thing that comes to mind is:  wouldn't create more value for the 'guest coin' seeing its supply diminished? and less value for current BCR holders 'shares'?  

Yes like the key chain idea on all btc ltc dash keys.

When will it be possible that these wallets start up without crash or error. could you not have a chat with the maia coin
or x14 coin dev. guys makes great wallets.. hope to hear ya soon on this one.

a whole day has passed one wallet started and synced. and is giving me @&#@* inside the bitcredit.conf file.

then again the other one won't budge. move an inch. just errrooooor.. some gigabyte of memory like 12 or cores like 8 right now here, still no go.

please help
thanks again

Having some issues installing bitcredit-qt on Windows 8.1

It crashes on startup.  Any thoughts?

Hi

What type of key and from which chain are you trying to import, using which client version? All standard BTC/LTC/DASH keys should import pretty easily.

oh.. and on this subject , how would you guys like the extra utility of being able to use the same one private key across all these chains?

Say you get one BCR privkey and just translate it into the various chains you want...essentially meaning that you could instead of keeping a ton of privkeys...just store the one, that you can use on all BTC based chains?

I plan to make a public offer to any communities who whose coins lack a dev or, coins that have strong communities but no direction. The offer will be as follows :-

Our bidding process will be expanded with a secondary system that lists all accepted and interested coins, essentially we would encourage them to burn their coins and be allocated new coins on our chain. As it stands we have a 6 000 000 BCR fund that has remained untouched since the very first day , over the months there has never been any real use for it and now that we have moved to backing our coin with assets..it seems an unnecessary item. Rather than burn the coins or use them/sell whatever, i think it's a great opportunity to expand the BCR community while at the same time possibly draining value from other coins and adding it to our own. 

We would of course have stringent requirements for a coin to qualify and include as much oversight as we can. I think that the potential increase in community size and subsequent interest in ideas like bidding, BN mining could have some serious benefits for all.

Thoughts ?

can you guys confirm you still can create new addresses and import them?

I might be overlooking something... just got the following error while importing a private key (with wallet unlocked and synched):

money to vps or asics..
someone tell the solution
burst tried one..

i think i have a idea that could work and costs no energy..

Taking a look, though mine has been syncing all this time.