Pages:
Author

Topic: bitfloor issues? - page 33. (Read 55548 times)

full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
May 08, 2013, 01:51:13 PM
They have obviously decided that the less we know, the better it is for them.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
May 08, 2013, 01:34:27 PM
Must have been really slow, I still haven't gotten any notification.

Same here. I've also never received any email response to the 3 support emails I've sent to Bitfloor in the last 3 weeks.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 501
Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong
May 08, 2013, 01:28:02 PM
I think once the market became illiquid he stopped notifying.

Best of luck to everyone in recovering their assets though.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 08, 2013, 01:26:19 PM


Edit: Arstechnica piece quotes an unnamed Bitfloor spokesman as follows:

Quote
Bitfloor shares its customers' frustration with its bank's delay in providing access to funds currently in Bitfloor's account...
Kind of reminds you of another reason to be interested in Bitcoins in the first place! 
Indeed it does.  The people who were notified of the closure quickly bought BTC and got the hell out of there.  Not clear to me why he didn't halt trading the moment he started notifying people.  I had a sell order in for an unreasonably high price at the time, but someone who got notified bought through it, and now I'm stuck with a bunch of USD the banks won't let me touch.

I wouldn't be upset if there hadn't been "favored customer" notification.
I don't think the notification was tp favored customers, but to everyone slowly.
Must have been really slow, I still haven't gotten any notification.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 501
Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong
May 08, 2013, 01:19:10 PM


Edit: Arstechnica piece quotes an unnamed Bitfloor spokesman as follows:

Quote
Bitfloor shares its customers' frustration with its bank's delay in providing access to funds currently in Bitfloor's account...



Kind of reminds you of another reason to be interested in Bitcoins in the first place! 
Indeed it does.  The people who were notified of the closure quickly bought BTC and got the hell out of there.  Not clear to me why he didn't halt trading the moment he started notifying people.  I had a sell order in for an unreasonably high price at the time, but someone who got notified bought through it, and now I'm stuck with a bunch of USD the banks won't let me touch.

I wouldn't be upset if there hadn't been "favored customer" notification.


I don't think the notification was tp favored customers, but to everyone slowly.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 08, 2013, 10:30:51 AM


Edit: Arstechnica piece quotes an unnamed Bitfloor spokesman as follows:

Quote
Bitfloor shares its customers' frustration with its bank's delay in providing access to funds currently in Bitfloor's account...

Kind of reminds you of another reason to be interested in Bitcoins in the first place! 
Indeed it does.  The people who were notified of the closure quickly bought BTC and got the hell out of there.  Not clear to me why he didn't halt trading the moment he started notifying people.  I had a sell order in for an unreasonably high price at the time, but someone who got notified bought through it, and now I'm stuck with a bunch of USD the banks won't let me touch.

I wouldn't be upset if there hadn't been "favored customer" notification.
jr. member
Activity: 34
Merit: 12
May 07, 2013, 07:06:39 PM


Edit: Arstechnica piece quotes an unnamed Bitfloor spokesman as follows:

Quote
Bitfloor shares its customers' frustration with its bank's delay in providing access to funds currently in Bitfloor's account...

Kind of reminds you of another reason to be interested in Bitcoins in the first place! 
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
May 06, 2013, 06:52:29 PM

Edit: Arstechnica piece quotes an unnamed Bitfloor spokesman as follows:

Quote
Bitfloor shares its customers' frustration with its bank's delay in providing access to funds currently in Bitfloor's account. Bitfloor has engaged legal counsel to assist in this matter. Through counsel, Bitfloor is in active dialogue with its bank and is taking all reasonable steps to facilitate the return of funds, consistent with Bitfloor's legal obligations.

Bitfloor regrets this delay, thanks its customers for their patience to date, and appeals to its customers to continue to be patient as Bitfloor works diligently to resolve this situation.

Thank you for this update.   After reviewing the youtube interview, I honestly think Roman has good intentions, but it's always good to have a back-up plan.  I hope they sort this mess out soon.  I'd like to get back into the swing of things. <3 Bitfloor.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
May 06, 2013, 02:13:11 PM
Hi everyone,

First, let me say that taking expensive legal action is the last thing I want to do. I want to give Roman and Bitfloor the benefit of the doubt that they're working as hard as possible to return USD funds to affected customers.

However, given the worrying scarcity of communication from Bitfloor about the status of USD balance withdrawals, I'm trying to get organized. If a class action lawsuit becomes the only option for recovering any portion of USD funds owed, someone needs to figure out who has been affected and how much is at stake.

I started a reddit thread to this effect, and as of this morning 102 redditors have reported to me that they're waiting on a total of $337,000. I have collected email addresses from as many of these people as have felt comfortable providing an address, and I am in touch with a few lawyers to figure out what options we all may have if we need to take legal action. I will be providing updates via BCC'ed email to those who have provided me with an address.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1dqz4v/i_have_pmed_15_other_redditors_with_bitfloor/

If you would like to share your current USD balance owed and your email address, I will add you to my list. You can contact me via PM on reddit or PM me here. The more people respond, the more easily we'll be able to attract a good lawyer, because the potential upside for them from the case will be higher.

Again, legal action is NOT what I want to take. Every bit of that legal expense will eat into the amount we hope to recover. But I want to be prepared if that ends up being our only option.

Good luck to everyone hoping to recover funds.

Edit: Arstechnica piece quotes a Bitfloor spokesman as follows:

Quote
Bitfloor shares its customers' frustration with its bank's delay in providing access to funds currently in Bitfloor's account. Bitfloor has engaged legal counsel to assist in this matter. Through counsel, Bitfloor is in active dialogue with its bank and is taking all reasonable steps to facilitate the return of funds, consistent with Bitfloor's legal obligations.

Bitfloor regrets this delay, thanks its customers for their patience to date, and appeals to its customers to continue to be patient as Bitfloor works diligently to resolve this situation.

Later, the article was amended and identified the spokesman as Bitfloor attorney John Snyder, who wrote in an email statement:

Quote
The bank has not told us why it has delayed making available Bitfloor's U.S. dollar funds, but we are hopeful that this issue will be resolved soon. Bitfloor has sufficient U.S. dollar funds in its accounts to cover all of its customers' U.S. dollar credits on account.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
May 04, 2013, 01:50:39 AM
What I don't understand is how they managed to make the holding (um, "hoarding") of gold illegal in 1933 without a widespread backlash.  The hubris of even considering the action shocks me.  But then, it was the middle of the Great Depression, so I presume most people had better things to worry about, like food and shelter.

How can they get away with raising taxes only on the "rich" (quotes intentionally because it is always poorly defined) to pay for increased spending which mostly benefits the "non-rich"?  Easy, people are selfish, shortsighted, and greedy.  Modern day career (lifetime) politicians are masters of exploiting those characteristics. 

Most working class people didn't have any significant gold bullion in the early 1900s and if they did they sold it (likely to already insanely rich people) during the depression so they wouldn't starve.  The rich had bigger problems to worry about.  There was serious talk about nationalization of wealth (aka communism) in the 1930s.  Having to sell some coins to Uncle Sam is a small price compared to suddenly all your wealth is owned by "the people".

It would be like the government today saying private jets or residences valued at more than $20,000,000 are prohibited (or slapped with a punitive excessive wealth annual tax).  How much of an uproar would that cause?  Divide and Conquer has been a tool of subjugation for the state for a couple thousand years and it still works just as well today.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
May 03, 2013, 06:22:30 PM
Whats the head count up in hear! How much you guys out?

         Originally i had watched this video and thought maybe just maybe this guy was just in a bad situation that he was trying to make right and its after watching this video that i took a chance on bitfloor ! Now after this second fiasco..

which i barely escaped!! Like i said i pulled out thousands from bitfloor on a hunch or a bad feeling a day or two before the shutdown! call it spider senses or whatever but i was dam lucky! If not i would be in here just the same as you guys in limbo with great concern and an apple like feeling in my throat!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKL5qFP4ZVs&t=7m53s


Thats what bothers me about the second fiasco.. I just keep asking myself really.. thats the actions of the guy in that video??

Unless it was a complete fabrication.. it seems that "that guy" would be doing his best to ease concerns and make sure everyone came out ok.
Thats why im leaning toward lawyers telling him to zip up! Either way.. The wording on the bitfloor site does not make me confident.

Not receiving emails didnt make me confident either.. tho i had less than a dollar left in my account thats not the point! Everyone should have gotten an email notifying them of a potential shutdown and they should have been given ample time to pull funds!

If everyone had gotten the email than i wouldnt have thought nothing of it. But since the emails were selectively sent out and i myself didnt get one, it leaves room in my imagination for something more sinister.. like hey lets just go out of business and walk off with the funds! "We can claim we gave notification"..

That could be far from the truth!! But silence makes ya think about stuff in a dare i say it --- a "360 degree" kinda of way where you try and work out the possibility of whats happening!

I hope for everyone involved including bitfloor and roman and the people who are @ a loss literally and for the rest of the bitcoin community and the onlookers and potential investors and new comers that this works out ok.

I noticed a new exchange opening up its beta.."kraken" and i wonder what the bitfloor fiasco's has done to the potential markets  for new exchanges.

Kind of like what bfl has done to new asic manufacturers .. They are gonna have to go through a kind of scrutiny that may make it difficult at best to venture into bitcoin.







 


sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I am Citizenfive.
May 03, 2013, 05:14:35 PM
It is quite obvious that there is a very real possibility that we aren't getting our money back ...
It is? Is there some source that supports this? Or is it just a feeling you have? Roman is always ridiculously quiet about everything. Even when the 25kBTC hack happened. I would actually fault him for that quite a bit myself: that's not how you run a business, regardless of what happens.
From the moment we let the money out of our direct control, there's been a very real possibility of not getting it back.  The only question is that of probabilities.  And speaking objectively, the longer it's being held by Bitfloor, the worse that probability gets.  Roman's reputation is the only reason most of us have any hope at all.

n.b. This includes fiat in bank accounts we "control."  Ask people in Cyprus about that.  Haircuts are probably not coming to the US anytime soon, but when it comes to any country, they won't announce it in advance, because that would defeat the whole purpose.  (It can be argued that there is no greater Ponzi scheme than our fractional reserve banking system.)

Hell, even if you stuff your mattress with cash, its "value" is being silently leeched away via inflation.

What I don't understand is how they managed to make the holding (um, "hoarding") of gold illegal in 1933 without a widespread backlash.  The hubris of even considering the action shocks me.  But then, it was the middle of the Great Depression, so I presume most people had better things to worry about, like food and shelter.

...Sometimes I wish I'd never heard of Bitcoin, because what I've learned since is a whole big series of very uncomfortable truths.

Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill? :p

Anyway, yes, this exactly, 100% agree.

Also agree with the possible significance of the choice of the word "remaining". Been wondering that too but I figured if I started playing linguistic Sherlock Holmes I'd get smacked by someone. But I concur, it is an interesting choice, such that he may have accidentally gave a clue he didn't intend to -- that perhaps the bank also withheld some funds for some reason? This also did occur after tax day, so is it possible that the IRS locked some funds for whatever reason? (ie, didn't file for gains on bitcoin properly, or something more sinister on the IRS's part maybe.)
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
May 03, 2013, 01:05:11 PM
Incidentally, "We are still waiting to hear back from the bank regarding our remaining account balance" suggests to me that they may have received the check, but that it was for an amount less than they were expecting.

Agreed. I've been trying to make sense of the words chosen for that message. It doesn't say "our account balance", what is the significance of "remaining"? Always more questions than answers.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 03, 2013, 11:37:58 AM
Incidentally, "We are still waiting to hear back from the bank regarding our remaining account balance" suggests to me that they may have received the check, but that it was for an amount less than they were expecting.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 03, 2013, 11:34:04 AM
It is quite obvious that there is a very real possibility that we aren't getting our money back ...
It is? Is there some source that supports this? Or is it just a feeling you have? Roman is always ridiculously quiet about everything. Even when the 25kBTC hack happened. I would actually fault him for that quite a bit myself: that's not how you run a business, regardless of what happens.
From the moment we let the money out of our direct control, there's been a very real possibility of not getting it back.  The only question is that of probabilities.  And speaking objectively, the longer it's being held by Bitfloor, the worse that probability gets.  Roman's reputation is the only reason most of us have any hope at all.

n.b. This includes fiat in bank accounts we "control."  Ask people in Cyprus about that.  Haircuts are probably not coming to the US anytime soon, but when it comes to any country, they won't announce it in advance, because that would defeat the whole purpose.  (It can be argued that there is no greater Ponzi scheme than our fractional reserve banking system.)

Hell, even if you stuff your mattress with cash, its "value" is being silently leeched away via inflation.

What I don't understand is how they managed to make the holding (um, "hoarding") of gold illegal in 1933 without a widespread backlash.  The hubris of even considering the action shocks me.  But then, it was the middle of the Great Depression, so I presume most people had better things to worry about, like food and shelter.

...Sometimes I wish I'd never heard of Bitcoin, because what I've learned since is a whole big series of very uncomfortable truths.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
May 02, 2013, 06:49:49 PM
He might of just told everyone what the bank told him and he's waiting just like everyone else

so 1 day past the 10 days he said ... not really earth shaking.

If we are in this thread 30 days later talking about why hes not saying anything! Well thats a whole different story.

Even 10 days from now, hell a couple more pages in this thread!... The tone of this conversation is gonna change real quick.. Im sure it wont be the last time you hear the word lawyer. I was just saying he might be in between a hard place and a rock himself and has to to keep quiet.




legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1019
Be A Digital Miner
May 02, 2013, 06:48:21 PM
Why would he need to lawyer up?
seriously? do have any idea how much liability he is swimming in at this moment?
and that's not even including the liability he is still under from the theft that occurred last August.
Please enlighten me.   I realize he has civil liability for his careless loss of his customers' 23,000 25,000 bitcoins.   What other legal problems do you think he could have?
Liability, not "legal problems." Two different things. As for "what other?" Owing a bunch of people tens of thousands of USD after the bank close is the other one.
then he really does not have that much more liability since he already owes all these people 23,000 which he will never be able to repay.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
May 02, 2013, 06:38:07 PM
Why would he need to lawyer up?
seriously? do have any idea how much liability he is swimming in at this moment?
and that's not even including the liability he is still under from the theft that occurred last August.
Please enlighten me.   I realize he has civil liability for his careless loss of his customers' 23,000 25,000 bitcoins.   What other legal problems do you think he could have?

Liability, not "legal problems." Two different things. As for "what other?" Owing a bunch of people tens of thousands of USD after the bank close is the other one.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1019
Be A Digital Miner
May 02, 2013, 06:31:58 PM
Why would he need to lawyer up?
seriously? do have any idea how much liability he is swimming in at this moment?
and that's not even including the liability he is still under from the theft that occurred last August.
Please enlighten me.   I realize he has civil liability for his careless loss of his customers' 23,000 bitcoins.   What other legal problems do you think he could have?
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
May 02, 2013, 05:46:53 PM
Why would he need to lawyer up?

seriously? do have any idea how much liability he is swimming in at this moment?

and that's not even including the liability he is still under from the theft that occurred last August.
Pages:
Jump to: