[BitFunder] Asset Exchange Marketplace + Rewritable Options Trading - page 59.

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: Deprived on January 27, 2013, 03:09:11 PM

Quote from: ianbakewell on January 27, 2013, 03:06:50 PM

You might be able to bump up volume with a little tweak to how you allow bids to be placed.
The bid side on bitfunder assets is really shallow compared to btct.co ...
Deprived explained the reason why in one of his updates a few weeks ago, catching my attention:

Quote from: Deprived on January 08, 2013, 06:14:34 AM

Bitfunder doesn't allow leveraging same funds across orders on multiple securities in the same wat LTC-Global/BTC.CO do - so unfortunately we have to keep more capital there to maintain same volume of orders. Because of that I have to pass up marginally profitable trades - but there's enough decent opportunities there to still make trading there worthwhile.

That changed in last day or so - or seems to have done for me anyway.

Still making adjustments to it also. )

Deprived

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: ianbakewell on January 27, 2013, 03:06:50 PM

You might be able to bump up volume with a little tweak to how you allow bids to be placed.
The bid side on bitfunder assets is really shallow compared to btct.co ...
Deprived explained the reason why in one of his updates a few weeks ago, catching my attention:

Quote from: Deprived on January 08, 2013, 06:14:34 AM

Bitfunder doesn't allow leveraging same funds across orders on multiple securities in the same wat LTC-Global/BTC.CO do - so unfortunately we have to keep more capital there to maintain same volume of orders. Because of that I have to pass up marginally profitable trades - but there's enough decent opportunities there to still make trading there worthwhile.

That changed in last day or so - or seems to have done for me anyway.

Deprived

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: ianbakewell on January 27, 2013, 03:12:10 AM

I noticed that if I cancel a bid by using the button beside it that the bid will disappear but the BTC will still be reserved

This may be just a temporary display glitch. If you cancel an order, when the screen refreshes it still shows the OLD reserved amount (same thing happens if you actually buy/sell - it displays old value). If you go to market then back to the asset it gets updated. You CAN still place bids even if the (outdated) reserved amoutn would indiicate you couldn't - there's no client-side check for validity, it's only checked at server-side (which has the correct amount).

Oh - and big thanks to Ukyo for implementing reserves being on a per-asset basis rather than global: allows me to trade a lot more without tieing up actual BTC on lots of orders that individually only have a small chance of filling.

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

The order canceling reserve issue should be correct. Also made sure that no one should have reserves higher than they have orders for.

While working on the above issue, I noticed that BitFunder's volume as of this moment for the last 24hrs is over 175 BTC and earlier was at 230 BTC for a new record.

We also have a hand full of new assets getting ready to go live soon as well.

I just wanted to say thank you to everyone who has showed their support for BitFunder and has helped to get it to where it is already.

I look forward to continuing to to work with everyone building on a site the community loves and trusts.

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: ianbakewell on January 27, 2013, 03:12:10 AM

I noticed that if I cancel a bid by using the button beside it that the bid will disappear but the BTC will still be reserved

Hmm, I will look into that, as well as correct your reserve, and do a bids/reserves check.

Thanks for the heads up.

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: Deprived on January 27, 2013, 01:31:01 AM

Very trivial glitch to fix.

My transactions list includes this:

2013-01-26 03:18:43 DIVIDEND: (CoinBr.MPBPT-O)
0 * ฿0.10999000

I have held these in the past but presently don't have any. Looks like when you did the buy-back thing on it, you added transactions for everyone who was in the transaction table for it rather than just for those who currently held more than 0 shares.

No funds were added/subtracted and no harm done - other than a spammy message in my transaction list

Heya, thanks for letting me know. I actually caught this earlier and corrected it.
Should not happen again. Thanks.

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: Deprived on January 27, 2013, 02:17:35 AM

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 27, 2013, 01:35:24 AM

Quote from: Deprived on January 27, 2013, 01:31:01 AM

Very trivial glitch to fix.

My transactions list includes this:

2013-01-26 03:18:43 DIVIDEND: (CoinBr.MPBPT-O)
0 * ฿0.10999000

I have held these in the past but presently don't have any. Looks like when you did the buy-back thing on it, you added transactions for everyone who was in the transaction table for it rather than just for those who currently held more than 0 shares.

No funds were added/subtracted and no harm done - other than a spammy message in my transaction list

That's like a one line fix Tongue

Just add && amount > 0 to the SQL query.

Well you DO need to insert it into the right place in the query (and maybe qualify it with which table/query/view amount is to be taken from - which could be the bug in first place if 'amount' occurs as a field both in the transactions table and also in some query used to get current holdings). Would guess current quantity held isn't a value stored in an actual database table (that would break normalisation) but rather a value in a query (or a virtual table - dunno which RDBMS they use).

Obviously it depends on the implementation / structure but the site is storing the 0 * part..

Deprived

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 27, 2013, 01:35:24 AM

Quote from: Deprived on January 27, 2013, 01:31:01 AM

Very trivial glitch to fix.

My transactions list includes this:

2013-01-26 03:18:43 DIVIDEND: (CoinBr.MPBPT-O)
0 * ฿0.10999000

I have held these in the past but presently don't have any. Looks like when you did the buy-back thing on it, you added transactions for everyone who was in the transaction table for it rather than just for those who currently held more than 0 shares.

No funds were added/subtracted and no harm done - other than a spammy message in my transaction list

That's like a one line fix Tongue

Just add && amount > 0 to the SQL query.

Well you DO need to insert it into the right place in the query (and maybe qualify it with which table/query/view amount is to be taken from - which could be the bug in first place if 'amount' occurs as a field both in the transactions table and also in some query used to get current holdings). Would guess current quantity held isn't a value stored in an actual database table (that would break normalisation) but rather a value in a query (or a virtual table - dunno which RDBMS they use).

🏰 TradeFortress 🏰

vip

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1043

👻

Quote from: Deprived on January 27, 2013, 01:31:01 AM

Very trivial glitch to fix.

My transactions list includes this:

2013-01-26 03:18:43 DIVIDEND: (CoinBr.MPBPT-O)
0 * ฿0.10999000

I have held these in the past but presently don't have any. Looks like when you did the buy-back thing on it, you added transactions for everyone who was in the transaction table for it rather than just for those who currently held more than 0 shares.

No funds were added/subtracted and no harm done - other than a spammy message in my transaction list

That's like a one line fix Tongue

Just add && amount > 0 to the SQL query.

Deprived

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Very trivial glitch to fix.

My transactions list includes this:

2013-01-26 03:18:43 DIVIDEND: (CoinBr.MPBPT-O)
0 * ฿0.10999000

I have held these in the past but presently don't have any. Looks like when you did the buy-back thing on it, you added transactions for everyone who was in the transaction table for it rather than just for those who currently held more than 0 shares.

No funds were added/subtracted and no harm done - other than a spammy message in my transaction list

SpaceJelly

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: Ukyo on January 23, 2013, 10:29:57 AM

Quote from: SpaceJelly on January 23, 2013, 07:42:53 AM

Hi Ukyo,

Is the ticket system stuck again? Posted a ticket yesterday and it's showing as open but no acknowledgement.

Thanks, S

Sorry, I saw the ticket, and was debating the best way to handle it. I will make sure to post acknowledgements at least next time.

ok cool, I thought it may be a challenging one

Thanks for the update!

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: SpaceJelly on January 23, 2013, 07:42:53 AM

Hi Ukyo,

Is the ticket system stuck again? Posted a ticket yesterday and it's showing as open but no acknowledgement.

Thanks, S

Sorry, I saw the ticket, and was debating the best way to handle it. I will make sure to post acknowledgements at least next time.

SpaceJelly

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Hi Ukyo,

Is the ticket system stuck again? Posted a ticket yesterday and it's showing as open but no acknowledgement.

Thanks, S

strello

full member

Activity: 234

Merit: 101

Great- all fixed now.

Thanks!

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Hey Strello,

Your ticket has been updated and reserve has been corrected.

Your account was one of the first on BitFunder, and for about half~1 day there was a bug on removing reserves when canceling asks.

Just to be sure no one else was effected I added a new auto-check on our side that will monitor reserve totals & pending asks.

Thanks again and sorry for the delay on the ticket.

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: strello on January 16, 2013, 09:16:51 AM

I have no buy orders outstanding, yet when I try to withdraw or use this balance it says I have some BTC "reserved", so it will only allow me to withdraw or use the difference.

Why is this?

I submitted a support request yesterday morning with no response yet.

Is there a way to unlock these frozen funds?

Strange, I do not see an open ticket.
If you look under support tab do you see one open?
Perhaps it did not get sent in?

Not sure what the delay is on the support system but I will definitely get it checked into right now.

Thanks

strello

full member

Activity: 234

Merit: 101

I have no buy orders outstanding, yet when I try to withdraw or use this balance it says I have some BTC "reserved", so it will only allow me to withdraw or use the difference.

Why is this?

I submitted a support request yesterday morning with no response yet.

Is there a way to unlock these frozen funds?

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Users can now select "Email Visibility" setting for their profile on signup and on the settings page.
This allows users to choose if issuers can view their email address for ease of well, whatever may or may not happen in the future. Wink

For those who do not want their address shared, they can leave it to only share their public btc address.

Ukyo

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on January 15, 2013, 06:37:08 AM

Bug report: After cancelling a bid, the newly available balance is updated on the page, but not updated for the calculator

Yup, previously mentioned the page has already loaded the data before the process happens.

I have been testing some JS to update it as the page loads once the cancel is confirmed.
I should be syncing it to the main build tonight or tomorrow.

burger

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ukyo on January 13, 2013, 09:55:53 PM

Hey everyone,

I am happy to say that beta testing of the API system is underway.
If you want to be included in the beta send me a pm and I will add you to the list to get access as we are ready for you.

Right now it is going on a person by person basis going over documentation, functionality, and ease of use.

Nice, I might make a Windows 8 app when the api is released.

Topic: [BitFunder] Asset Exchange Marketplace + Rewritable Options Trading - page 59. (Read 129505 times)