I have btcmp.com working, but it's been flaky the last few days (the pool itself). If it stabilizes, I'll release my patch (I didn't push it to github yet).
FYI i've patched up AltSliceScheduler, should be stable and a little more aggressive in switching pools when threshold is met (rather than finishing it's slice). Also the slices are truly proportional now.
Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 83. (Read 355823 times)
I finaly got btcworld.de working...
It turned out it made my workername "MaGNeT.1" lowercase and I didn't notice that... Logged in 10 times to verify settings, compare pools.cfg, etc and didn't see it
17 pools ready to hop, 2 for backup
It turned out it made my workername "MaGNeT.1" lowercase and I didn't notice that... Logged in 10 times to verify settings, compare pools.cfg, etc and didn't see it
17 pools ready to hop, 2 for backup
i just made a poclbm fork that gets its server list from an bitHopper address.
it checks every three seconds for the current pool and switches if neccesary
if you want to try it out:
https://github.com/flower1024/poclbm
yout bitHopper url (use DATA instead of STATS - as this is where the json is, atm you must supply a username and a password):
http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data
a working command line looks like this:
python -O poclbm.py http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data --no-server-failbacks -d 1 -v -w64 -f10
04/08/2011 23:49:06, reading serverlist from bitHopper http://localhost:8337/data
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server polmine.pl:8347 user XXX pass XXX
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server api2.bitcoin.cz:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server mtred.com:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server eu1.triplemining.com:8344
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server su.mining.eligius.st:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server ozco.in:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.bitclockers.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, Setting server (peter1 @ bitclockers)
bitclockers 04/08/2011 23:49:17, LP connected to bitclockers
if this fork works and brings any use i might add:
- backup server support (select one of bitHoppers backup pools)
- submit share and reject information to bitHopper to keep their stats working
it checks every three seconds for the current pool and switches if neccesary
if you want to try it out:
https://github.com/flower1024/poclbm
yout bitHopper url (use DATA instead of STATS - as this is where the json is, atm you must supply a username and a password):
http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data
a working command line looks like this:
python -O poclbm.py http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data --no-server-failbacks -d 1 -v -w64 -f10
04/08/2011 23:49:06, reading serverlist from bitHopper http://localhost:8337/data
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server polmine.pl:8347 user XXX pass XXX
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server api2.bitcoin.cz:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server mtred.com:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server eu1.triplemining.com:8344
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server su.mining.eligius.st:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server ozco.in:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.bitclockers.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, Setting server (peter1 @ bitclockers)
bitclockers 04/08/2011 23:49:17, LP connected to bitclockers
if this fork works and brings any use i might add:
- backup server support (select one of bitHoppers backup pools)
- submit share and reject information to bitHopper to keep their stats working
I hate to ask more of your time
but could you add this feature to the phatk2 poclbm fork located here, https://github.com/progranism/poclbmUnless you allready added phatk2 and phatk2_1 support to this fork?
i just made a poclbm fork that gets its server list from an bitHopper address.
it checks every three seconds for the current pool and switches if neccesary
if you want to try it out:
https://github.com/flower1024/poclbm
yout bitHopper url (use DATA instead of STATS - as this is where the json is, atm you must supply a username and a password):
http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data
a working command line looks like this:
python -O poclbm.py http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data --no-server-failbacks -d 1 -v -w64 -f10
04/08/2011 23:49:06, reading serverlist from bitHopper http://localhost:8337/data
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server polmine.pl:8347 user XXX pass XXX
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server api2.bitcoin.cz:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server mtred.com:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server eu1.triplemining.com:8344
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server su.mining.eligius.st:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server ozco.in:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.bitclockers.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, Setting server (peter1 @ bitclockers)
bitclockers 04/08/2011 23:49:17, LP connected to bitclockers
if this fork works and brings any use i might add:
- backup server support (select one of bitHoppers backup pools)
- submit share and reject information to bitHopper to keep their stats working
it checks every three seconds for the current pool and switches if neccesary
if you want to try it out:
https://github.com/flower1024/poclbm
yout bitHopper url (use DATA instead of STATS - as this is where the json is, atm you must supply a username and a password):
http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data
a working command line looks like this:
python -O poclbm.py http://chaos:x@localhost:8337/data --no-server-failbacks -d 1 -v -w64 -f10
04/08/2011 23:49:06, reading serverlist from bitHopper http://localhost:8337/data
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server polmine.pl:8347 user XXX pass XXX
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server api2.bitcoin.cz:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server mtred.com:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.rfcpool.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server eu1.triplemining.com:8344
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server su.mining.eligius.st:8337
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server ozco.in:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, adding server pool.bitclockers.com:8332
04/08/2011 23:49:06, Setting server (peter1 @ bitclockers)
bitclockers 04/08/2011 23:49:17, LP connected to bitclockers
if this fork works and brings any use i might add:
- backup server support (select one of bitHoppers backup pools)
- submit share and reject information to bitHopper to keep their stats working
got this one a moment ago...
and another...
mining with a phoenix 1.50 here if it matters
... this new feature keeps me ocupied
Code:
[23:22:02] received lp from: rfc None
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 388, in errback
self._startRunCallbacks(fail)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 455, in _startRunCallbacks
self._runCallbacks()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 542, in _runCallbacks
current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1076, in gotResult
_inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
------
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1020, in _inlineCallbacks
result = g.send(result)
File "/home/alex/bitHopper/work.py", line 66, in jsonrpc_lpcall
lp.receive(None,server)
File "/home/alex/bitHopper/lp.py", line 30, in receive
response = json.loads(body)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/json/__init__.py", line 326, in loads
return _default_decoder.decode(s)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/json/decoder.py", line 360, in decode
obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
exceptions.TypeError: expected string or buffer
[23:22:05] RPC request [getwork] submitted to RFCPool.com
and another...
Code:
[23:22:47] RPC request [getwork] submitted to RFCPool.com
[23:22:47] received lp from: rfc {"id":1,"error":null,"result":{"midstate":"d994370bb78db27f23cf47bbdc7a1b332d103d546aa6afc8b93cfcb1e8ce6d6f","target":"ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff00000000","data":"00000001c4347fbccd00e6a3b2a698498b71e39806abefbf2d76472b000007ed000000003c4b7b40c1737bc8b443c762874fc0226d48fa50156f1d9ad4d95134149314e84e3b0da41a08e1e500000000000000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000080020000","hash1":"00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000"}}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bitHopper.py", line 296, in
main()
File "bitHopper.py", line 292, in main
reactor.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1158, in run
self.mainLoop()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1167, in mainLoop
self.runUntilCurrent()
------
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 789, in runUntilCurrent
call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
[23:22:47] LP triggered serving miner
[23:22:48] RPC request [d6f05000] submitted to RFCPool.com
mining with a phoenix 1.50 here if it matters
... this new feature keeps me ocupied
They have been doing this for some time (see bclc thread).
Round are announced 0-3600 seconds after completion. This means you will pretty much always miss out on sub 100k rounds, but still have time to get in before the 43.5% mark on longer rounds.
Despite this I still see decent profits on bclc
Round are announced 0-3600 seconds after completion. This means you will pretty much always miss out on sub 100k rounds, but still have time to get in before the 43.5% mark on longer rounds.
Despite this I still see decent profits on bclc
for me bclc has been more efficient than mtred and polmine.
seeing an average of 0.00005054 from bclc over 72 blocks.
lol btcserv claims to have more hash than the entire network
anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow
Quote
Network Speed: 13.87 THash/s
anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow
That's been red in my stats page for hours now
Quote
anyone use poclbm and having problems? anyone not using guiminer and having problems?
I use AOCLBF and still have the issues. I've given up on them in favour of my poor cards
lol btcserv claims to have more hash than the entire network
anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow
BTCPool24 took down their notice of stats and prop payment problems and yet i still have no coin from them.
signed up new user on bitclockers.. couldnt get a new IP as my isp is a jerk like that and wont give me a new one no matter how often i release and renew... tried all the pools.. still having issues.
I wonder if poclbm would be better than phoenix or perhaps it is guiminer.
anyone use poclbm and having problems? anyone not using guiminer and having problems?
Quote
Network Speed: 13.87 THash/s
anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow
BTCPool24 took down their notice of stats and prop payment problems and yet i still have no coin from them.
signed up new user on bitclockers.. couldnt get a new IP as my isp is a jerk like that and wont give me a new one no matter how often i release and renew... tried all the pools.. still having issues.
I wonder if poclbm would be better than phoenix or perhaps it is guiminer.
anyone use poclbm and having problems? anyone not using guiminer and having problems?
BTCserv lists the bitcoin network speed on the right, the poolspeed is on the top.
poclbm,phoenix,diablo,cgminer, all give bitclockers issues without using bithopper even.
Regarding btcpool24, they didnt finish a 2nd block it was the huge shares from the previous round that screwed up the json and "thought" it had 2 blocks solved, he fixed this and shares also got allocated correctly now. The prop payout is still normal prop, its not changing as some have mentioned in this thread.
lol btcserv claims to have more hash than the entire network
anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow
BTCPool24 took down their notice of stats and prop payment problems and yet i still have no coin from them.
signed up new user on bitclockers.. couldnt get a new IP as my isp is a jerk like that and wont give me a new one no matter how often i release and renew... tried all the pools.. still having issues.
I wonder if poclbm would be better than phoenix or perhaps it is guiminer.
anyone use poclbm and having problems? anyone not using guiminer and having problems?
Quote
Network Speed: 13.87 THash/s
anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow
BTCPool24 took down their notice of stats and prop payment problems and yet i still have no coin from them.
signed up new user on bitclockers.. couldnt get a new IP as my isp is a jerk like that and wont give me a new one no matter how often i release and renew... tried all the pools.. still having issues.
I wonder if poclbm would be better than phoenix or perhaps it is guiminer.
anyone use poclbm and having problems? anyone not using guiminer and having problems?
Still getting some errors but at least it slice_jumps without any problems
Is bitcoin.lc fucking with their stats? I just saw them drop to 500,000 shares, and their site said the current round has been going for an hour.
They have been doing this for some time (see bclc thread).
Round are announced 0-3600 seconds after completion. This means you will pretty much always miss out on sub 100k rounds, but still have time to get in before the 43.5% mark on longer rounds.
Despite this I still see decent profits on bclc
further on bitclockers (I'm your resident control sample, if you will):
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.
I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.
There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.
I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.
There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.
Bithopper is requesting more getworks than poclbm / phoenix on its own (since cherrypicker relies on getwork requests from miner)
There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.
Certainly seems that way.
and bithopper isn't down so the pool isn't down so the poclbm backup won't kick in.
bitHopper would have to be coded to disconnect / reject connection from the miners (simulate) being down when bitclocker pool is switched to. Just an idea I had.
further on bitclockers (I'm your resident control sample, if you will):
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.
I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.
There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.
I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.
There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.
Is bitcoin.lc fucking with their stats? I just saw them drop to 500,000 shares, and their site said the current round has been going for an hour.
and bithopper isn't down so the pool isn't down so the poclbm backup won't kick in.
Ok crazy idea here so don't shoot me. Was thinking about the bitclocker issue. What if we set the backup pools on each instance of poclbm or phoenix to mine on bitclockers when the primary pool is down (bitHopper). Then when bitHopper switches to bitclocker pool have bitHopper simulate a pool that has gone down so the miners will switch to backup pools (bitclocker).
Only problem is not being able to count the shares submitted to the pool by the miners.
Only problem is not being able to count the shares submitted to the pool by the miners.
I added some more logging to the Lp messages so I can figure out why json decoding is dieing. If they appear again tell me.
[06:03:23] received lp from: digbtc
504 Gateway Time-out
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 361, in c
allback
self._startRunCallbacks(result)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 455, in _
startRunCallbacks
self._runCallbacks()
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 542, in _
runCallbacks
current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1076, in
gotResult
_inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
---
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1020, in
_inlineCallbacks
result = g.send(result)
File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\work.py", line 71, in jsonrpc_lpcall
lp.receive(text,server)
File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\lp.py", line 30, in receive
response = json.loads(body)
File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 326, in loads
return _default_decoder.decode(s)
File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 366, in decode
obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 384, in raw_decode
raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")
exceptions.ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
[06:03:30] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:31] RPC request [b5d06000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [c42f6000] submitted to RFCPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [df638000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] RPC request [a6c4d000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] slush: 653949
[06:03:35] triple: 2672266
[06:03:35] bitp: 2346962
Jump to: