Satoshi talked about digital cash. You can't have digital cash with corporations running the nodes. Satoshi was wrong, he failed to predict the current situation. Bitcoin loses its store-of-value properties with a large blocksize.
Most people with real money invested in bitcoin don't care about whatever "satoshi's original vision" was. They understand being able to run nodes is a priority.
you can have digital cash without corporate control... growth via NODES (dynamics) means nodes display what they can handle and pools follow the consensus..
there is no "gigabytes by midnight causing datacentres" debate .. you have been hypnotised into that FUD
you have been brain washed that the BScore-porate control is the only way..
all the segwit imps and bips
gavin+garzig(BLOQ->DCG)
baryysilbert(dcg)
core(blockstream->DCG)
uasf(samson/lerner->DCG)
are all the same BS
BS= blockstream, B*ll S*it, barry silbert... its all the same BScartel
goodluck with you BScoin
You keep repeating this "there is no "gigabytes by midnight causing datacentres"" nonsense. When will you understand that technologies like bitcoin, get exponentially adopted which would mean there would be no way to smoothly scale on-chain transactions to handle all the demand without ending up with datacenters running nodes?
Notice how "gigabytes by midnight" would indeed be the case once the curve of adoption reaches the typical steepness and then you are fucked if you want to keep the fees low and keep everyone transacting on-chain happy without complains of "blocks are full".
lol "by midnight"....... ??
1. bitcoin WILL NOT become a one world currency where everyone is using it for everything...
2. bitcoin WILL NOT become a one world currency
once you stop hitting your head against the BS brick wall and wake up to realitiy that OVER DECADES
wait have to make this clear for you
OVER DECADES
and using an actual realistic user adoption growth and expectation. bitcoin can grow and cope.
your argument is like trying to tell activision to cease making Call of duty games because millions of people cant online game... when infact millions of people do online game.. and ontop of that they livestream in HD their gameplay, while also running commentary through voice chat and livestreams simultaneously.
holding at 1mb when 32mb is capable, but 8mb is 'average joe in wheatfield safe', and even when core themselves deem 4-8 safe but prefr 4mb to be extra anal.. shows how fooled you are.
there is no reason for 1mb to remain at all.. no reason
the hold at 1mb due to gigabytes by midnight, is the same stupid mindset as amputating newborn babies legs out of fear they may run into a car when older. so stopping them from running is the solution and throwing them into a electric wheelchair is the counter-solution to the amputation solution
