...What other choice does one have? Not mine? ...
Yes,
not mining
is an actual option.
...Doesn't mean I can't support Core and Segwit because I'm mining with Antminers...
No, you have every right to be a hypocrite and purchase equipment from a company you've disparaged for being a monopoly and you've accused of subversive mining practices. Just don't expect that when you do all 3 of those things publicly that there will not be anyone calling you out on your bullshit.
Genie buddy, what disparaging comments are you referring to particularly? I don't recall ever trashing Bitmain, all I've ever done is stated facts. In fact I have posted positive comments on this forum and others regarding how they continue to offer the public miners when other companies (e.g. bitfury) has not, and have advised others to buy direct from Bitmain due to the best-in-class product. Just read my post history.
I looked in my post history to find what has made you so angry, maybe you are referring to this comment I made on slushpool forum? - "Also, the fact is that Bitmain has too much influence due to their mining monopoly. They control well over 51% of the hash, if you consider the pools they influence and the farms they influence with their hosting contracts..."? It just so happens that the context and subject matter of this post is true. If you read through my post history you will see that I am Anti-Covert-Asicboost (only an ignoramus wouldn't be), so if I've said anything about Bitmain it is solely related to my hate for covert Asicboost. Guess what? When I buy more Antminers, I won't be using covert-Asicboost. So I am not being a hypocrite, I am supporting the cause I believe in and putting skin in the game.
I have not "accused" Bitmain of subversive mining practices, it is a *fact* that they own Asicboost patents, so one can assume they are using the IP they spent hundreds of thousands to protect... The related Segwit2X / Scaling stall tactics are all related to covert Asicboost and protecting it, only the uninformed do not realize this. How can other mining manufacturers get in the game when there is IP threats relating to patents on security exploits (it is not a network optimization), it is simply *unfeasible* and strengthens the monopoly. Why should anyone support a monopoly that is based on a security exploit?
Sorry, not-mining is *not* an option: I have access to low cost power, so I want to mine because it is profitable to mine. I will mine on a pool that supports the vision of Bitcoin that I have, how else can it be achieved if it isn't mined? I will not mine asicboost.
Boy you are quick to be negative aren't you?