I have some problems with the miningpool.co:
1) balance is not updated (I received two transactions and then balance is frozen);
2) incorrect Total Earnings (was decreased from 8 to 6).
Topic: Bitmark - page 152. (Read 622213 times)
Update
1. We have successfully launched Bitmark.
2. The difficulty has already re-targeted twice by the maximum amount, currently it is 16.
3. Here are some links
I would like to thank everybody for their kind words, excellent discussion, helpfulness, donations, and support.
Today was a good day, it was only the foundation, tomorrow our work to earn value by being useful and easy to adopt begins.
Bitmark Foundation BTM donation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
1. We have successfully launched Bitmark.
2. The difficulty has already re-targeted twice by the maximum amount, currently it is 16.
3. Here are some links
- A Bitmark Block Explorer on cryptexplorer.com, thank you
- A Bitmark mining pool at miningpool.co, thank you
- A Bitmark sub forum at cryptocointalk, thank you
I would like to thank everybody for their kind words, excellent discussion, helpfulness, donations, and support.
Today was a good day, it was only the foundation, tomorrow our work to earn value by being useful and easy to adopt begins.
Bitmark Foundation BTM donation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
Quote
0.250% (max) of the block reward goes to the bitmark development fund
Is that still planned or did it get scrapped
It was scrapped and replaced with a donation based bitmark foundation.
There is also to be a long running IPM, voluntary and entirely optional to raise funds for the foundation.
BTC Donations will be used in line with the IPM Proposal, tl;dr: used to lease mining rigs to support the network, 5% of the generated bitmarks would go to a foundation, 95% distributed to investors. This has extra benefits for network health and miners.
Our target is 0 BTC and 70,000 BTM. The BTMs in the foundation will not be touched until after 2015-07-13, longer if we can. We encourage donations of BTM, it will ensure this project lives long and can achieve what we plan.
This week we will create an automated IPM pool, each donor will be able to associated a BTC address with a BTM address, any donated BTC will be spent on leased miners up to 35% of the network hashrate, the BTM produced will distributed to donors according to the amount they donated. 5% will go to the foundation, to be locked for future development.
Development over the first year, or longer if possible, is voluntary.
Quote
0.250% (max) of the block reward goes to the bitmark development fund
Is that still planned or did it get scrapped
The Bitmark Foundation
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
Congrats on the hard work, dude.
EDIT: I suck at words
842 m/hs at miningpool.co and only 2 miners donating - shocking...
In defense of those of us who aren't donating: there is a 1.5% pool fee already.
I know, I know - I guess I'm a little ole skool... I will wind my neck in!
And just like that, the coin output has been slashed by a quarter... damm!
842 m/hs at miningpool.co and only 2 miners donating - shocking...
In defense of those of us who aren't donating: there is a 1.5% pool fee already.
The Bitmark Foundation
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
I will be feeding back some BM to the foundation.
Top feeder at MPC at 650+ m/hs no surprise diff is climbing - with net hash at 2.5GH/s!
The fun begins!
The Bitmark Foundation
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
./bitmarkd sendtoaddress bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG 200 "the bitmark foundation"
d3c1b75d68333d95c8e1c9db4f4ba5b4719bce97008fe73c0cfb5f551d7f3b2d
I have sent the first 200 coins to the bitmark foundation address: bQmnzVS5M4bBdZqBTuHrjnzxHS6oSUz6cG
The difficulty has jumped 4x already.
The network is at 2.5GH/s.
I did not expect this. These coins have no value, yet.
Thank you everybody, I think we can say we have launched successfully.
842 m/hs at miningpool.co and only 2 miners donating - shocking...
rpcallowip = allow JSON-RPC connections from specified IP address
server = accept command line and JSON-RPC commands
daemon = run in the background
rpcconnect does not exist
listen is enabled by default
rpcallowip can accept wildcards, for example *, 192.*, 192.168.*, 192.168.0.*
So we can conclude that this should work.
server = accept command line and JSON-RPC commands
daemon = run in the background
rpcconnect does not exist
listen is enabled by default
rpcallowip can accept wildcards, for example *, 192.*, 192.168.*, 192.168.0.*
So we can conclude that this should work.
Code:
rpcuser=emdje
rpcpassword=xxxxx
rpcallowip=192.168.*
server=1
daemon=1
Somehow not working. Will continue to mine with the pool. But that is not going so well.
I am trying to solo mine with my Asic too.
Using this config:
Does not seem to work.
someone any ideas?
--- I see the pool is reporting good hashrates now, so no real precedent here.
Using this config:
Code:
rpcuser=emdje
rpcpassword=xxxxx
rpcconnect=192.168.178.13
rpcallowip=192.168.178.21
rpcport=9266
daemon=1
server=1
listen=1
someone any ideas?
--- I see the pool is reporting good hashrates now, so no real precedent here.
Mine doesn't have the rpcallowip or the rpcconnect... and it's working... i have 400 btm so far
What is your config file look like than?
And is you qt on a different machine? (mine is)
mine is on the local machine... hashrate is 60MHs... but I switched to the pool... it was rejecting a lot of blocks!
Grrr... EU stratum up & down at miningpool.co
rpcallowip = allow JSON-RPC connections from specified IP address
server = accept command line and JSON-RPC commands
daemon = run in the background
rpcconnect does not exist
listen is enabled by default
rpcallowip can accept wildcards, for example *, 192.*, 192.168.*, 192.168.0.*
So we can conclude that this should work.
server = accept command line and JSON-RPC commands
daemon = run in the background
rpcconnect does not exist
listen is enabled by default
rpcallowip can accept wildcards, for example *, 192.*, 192.168.*, 192.168.0.*
So we can conclude that this should work.
Code:
rpcuser=emdje
rpcpassword=xxxxx
rpcallowip=192.168.*
server=1
daemon=1
I am trying to solo mine with my Asic too.
Using this config:
Does not seem to work.
someone any ideas?
--- I see the pool is reporting good hashrates now, so no real precedent here.
Using this config:
Code:
rpcuser=emdje
rpcpassword=xxxxx
rpcconnect=192.168.178.13
rpcallowip=192.168.178.21
rpcport=9266
daemon=1
server=1
listen=1
someone any ideas?
--- I see the pool is reporting good hashrates now, so no real precedent here.
Mine doesn't have the rpcallowip or the rpcconnect... and it's working... i have 400 btm so far
What is your config file look like than?
And is you qt on a different machine? (mine is)
So for the QT all I need to do is download and install - Then open QT and that is it?
Yes, that is all you need to do.
So for the QT all I need to do is download and install - Then open QT and that is it?
I ask because QT is synced, and I want to make sure all is good before i link it to the pool.
Thanks
I ask because QT is synced, and I want to make sure all is good before i link it to the pool.
Thanks
Mine doesn't have the rpcallowip or the rpcconnect... and it's working... i have 400 btm so far
What's your hashrate?
I am trying to solo mine with my Asic too.
Using this config:
Does not seem to work.
someone any ideas?
--- I see the pool is reporting good hashrates now, so no real precedent here.
Using this config:
Code:
rpcuser=emdje
rpcpassword=xxxxx
rpcconnect=192.168.178.13
rpcallowip=192.168.178.21
rpcport=9266
daemon=1
server=1
listen=1
someone any ideas?
--- I see the pool is reporting good hashrates now, so no real precedent here.
Mine doesn't have the rpcallowip or the rpcconnect... and it's working... i have 400 btm so far
Jump to: