Pages:
Author

Topic: bitsquare.io - The P2P Fiat-Bitcoin Exchange - page 6. (Read 34688 times)

staff
Activity: 4256
Merit: 1208
I support freedom of choice
New release already Cheesy

https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/releases/tag/v0.4.9.2

Quote
Please update as soon as possible to that new release.
There was a bug which caused high P2P network load. The sooner all users have updated the faster we get back to normal network load.

Release notes 0.4.9.2:

- Bugfix with repeated publication of trade statistics data
- Add "Show all currencies" to trade statistics view to see total volume of all currencies
- Add warning popup if Tor is enabled for http requests and user clicks a button to open a web page
- Show offerers bank name also for SEPA in offer details window
- Fix bug with missing market price updates
- Save Fiat and Altcoin currency list as JSON if --dumpStatistics is enabled
- Use info as default log level, improve logging
- Other minor bug fixes
k99
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 255
Manfred Karrer
New vesion 0.4.9.1 with trade statistics and extended Tor support is published:
https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/releases/tag/v0.4.9.1

This version comes with 2 important new features:
**Trade statistics** and **extended Tor support** for Bitcoin network and Http requests

I want to give a bit of background for both topics.

To collect trade statistic data in a P2P application is not that trivial as it would be in a server based application, but we found a practical solution which does not introduce privacy or centralization issues.
The trade statistics data are published via the P2P network and each node received those data and displays it in the UI.
Because the new data type is only supported by nodes which have already updated to 0.4.9.1 it might take a bit until the distribution of all the data is stable.
Each node in the P2P network forwards data to his connected nodes, but those old version nodes will not receive that new statistics data so the flooding of messages might take longer as usual.
Also old nodes will not send their past trade data to the network.
For all those reasons you might see the first days incomplete data and past trade volume will not be available until those nodes have updated to the latest version and are online again.
There is no guarantee that old trades will ever be visible if the users don't use Bitsquare anymore or have deleted their data directory.


The trade data only includes data which is already publicly visible like the offer data or the data which could be derived from the bitcoin blockchain (with much more effort), like trade amount, date and trade price.

We opened also a **bounty** for getting the statistics available at a web page:
https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/issues/546
At that Github issue you can find more details and an example of a trade statistics data object.


Another important update in that version is **extended Tor support** for the Bitcoin network and Http requests.
By default we still use clear net for Tor because it is not tested sufficiently yet and is considered experimental at that state.
But you can enable it under Settings/network.
There you find also the "Use Socks5 proxy for Http requests" check box. That will be enabled for new users but if you had Bitsquae already installed it is deactivated.
If you enable that it will use Tor for http requests to BitcoinAverage (Fiat market price feed).
Unfortunately Poloniex used CloudFlare which is very Tor-unfriendly and requires a captcha for connections from Tor exit nodes. That is why we need to use still clearnet for http requests to Poloniex (Altcoin market price feed). Though that should be a minor privacy concern as there are no personally identifying data in that request.

For those who want to go even further, there are 2 new program arguments for setting up socks5 proxies for bitcoin network and/or http requests.
--socks5ProxyBtcAddress=[host:port] and --socks5ProxyHttpAddress=[host:port]
If socks5ProxyHttpAddress is set but socks5ProxyHttpAddress is not defined the socks5ProxyBtc is used for http requests (instad of the Bitsquare internal Tor instance). But as the proxy will likely be a Tor proxy, we would have the same issues with Poloniex so thats why clearnet is used for Poloniex in that configuration.
If socks5ProxyHttpAddress is defined it should be a non-Tor proxy (e.g. VPN, maybe I2P works,...) and all http traffic including Poloniex will use that proxy.


Another short comment to that release:
Ethereum Classic has requested to **change their ticker symbol from ETHC to ETC**.
We added implemented but unfortunately we still need to support the old ticker symbol as there are existing offers out with the ETHC symbol.
It will be removed in the next version once there are no more ETHC offers out there.
If you had setup an account with ETHC please remove that and create a new one with ETC.
staff
Activity: 4256
Merit: 1208
I support freedom of choice
Feature request: Instant transfer on the same bank (search feature)
https://forum.bitsquare.io/t/instant-transfer-on-the-same-bank-search-feature/343
k99
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 255
Manfred Karrer
New Bitsquare release available!

Please update as soon as possible to that new release.
It comes with many new features and bugfixes.

https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/releases/tag/v0.4.9

New coins added:
EtherClassic, USD Tether, EUR Tether, JPY Tether, Lisk, DigixDAO Tokens, Worldcoin, FlorinCoin

We support the new Ether classic fork which will be availabe in about 1 week.
Please follow the projects web pages for further information and be sure you are aware of the risks involved in the situation of an Ethereum fork, both for ETH and ETHC trades!
https://ethereumclassic.github.io/
https://www.ethereum.org/
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
staff
Activity: 4256
Merit: 1208
I support freedom of choice
https://github.com/bitsquare/bitsquare/releases/tag/v0.4.8.1

Quote
There is a critical bug with v0.4.8 version when used with multiple arbitrators.
Please update as soon as possible to that hotfix release!

Please don't continue with open trades or taking offers with the 0.4.8 version, but update immeditely to the new version.
Before continuing trades please wait a few hours so the other trader has a chance to update as well.

But no worry, even if trades fail, the arbitrator can do the payout. So no funds are at risk!
If you could not contact the arbitrator, please contact the Bitsquare developers via the contact page on the webpage.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Release notes 0.4.8.1:

Fix bug with support for multiple arbitrators
k99
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 255
Manfred Karrer
Would love to support Bytecoin, but they need to offer similar feature as Monero (give the arbitrator a chance to verify the tx on the blockchain). If you select a XMR account in Bitsquare you get a popup with all the details.

I'm looking very forward to ongoing development of Bitsquare and have recently (well, late last year) brought it up in the BCN forum, at:

https://bytecointalk.org/showthread.php?tid=274

I'll be in touch via the github (will probably volunteer for testing which looks like it needs help?), translation, and mailing list.  Cheers!

Thanks.
I would love to support ByteCoin (and othere CryptoNote coins) but as the transaction cannot be verified by the arbitrator (in case of a dispute) on the blockchain (sender address is not visible) I cannot support it. I talked a bit to Monero guys and they told me it would be possibile but need some extra not yet implemented feature. I am not so familiar with ByteCoin but I think it will have the same issue as Monero.
So to summarize:
The requirement for adding CryptoNote coins is that a 3rd party (arbitrator in case of a dispute) is able to see on the blockchain if a transaction from the sender address to the receiver address has been done. 

As Monero is now supported -- https://bitsquare.io/faq/#altcoins -- and originally (as per the above discussion) it seemed that Bytecoin (BCN), Monero, and other similar coins had the issue of not being able to have some aspect of the transaction be verified by an arbitrator in case of a dispute on Bitsquare, it sounds like you have figured out a solution (with respect to Monero) which overcame this problem; which makes me wonder if also a similar avenue can also be explored with respect to BCN which would allow BCN to be supported.

Let me know a summary of what was the basic solution for Monero to get it included and how one could do the same for BCN.

Here is the info which gets displayed in Bitsquare:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1449498/15537245/7d6b7c5c-2275-11e6-9534-2d1073cf2d99.png

I am willing to give 0.2 BTC as a bounty for a Bytecoin support. I do not follow this thread frequently, so if someone is in position to collect the bounty please send me a private message.
slb
hero member
Activity: 598
Merit: 501
I'm looking very forward to ongoing development of Bitsquare and have recently (well, late last year) brought it up in the BCN forum, at:

https://bytecointalk.org/showthread.php?tid=274

I'll be in touch via the github (will probably volunteer for testing which looks like it needs help?), translation, and mailing list.  Cheers!

Thanks.
I would love to support ByteCoin (and othere CryptoNote coins) but as the transaction cannot be verified by the arbitrator (in case of a dispute) on the blockchain (sender address is not visible) I cannot support it. I talked a bit to Monero guys and they told me it would be possibile but need some extra not yet implemented feature. I am not so familiar with ByteCoin but I think it will have the same issue as Monero.
So to summarize:
The requirement for adding CryptoNote coins is that a 3rd party (arbitrator in case of a dispute) is able to see on the blockchain if a transaction from the sender address to the receiver address has been done. 

As Monero is now supported -- https://bitsquare.io/faq/#altcoins -- and originally (as per the above discussion) it seemed that Bytecoin (BCN), Monero, and other similar coins had the issue of not being able to have some aspect of the transaction be verified by an arbitrator in case of a dispute on Bitsquare, it sounds like you have figured out a solution (with respect to Monero) which overcame this problem; which makes me wonder if also a similar avenue can also be explored with respect to BCN which would allow BCN to be supported.

Let me know a summary of what was the basic solution for Monero to get it included and how one could do the same for BCN.

Here is the info which gets displayed in Bitsquare:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1449498/15537245/7d6b7c5c-2275-11e6-9534-2d1073cf2d99.png

I am willing to give 0.2 BTC as a bounty for a Bytecoin support. I do not follow this thread frequently, so if someone is in position to collect the bounty please send me a private message.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Will Factom be on this exchange at launch?

You can find a list of 'Altcoins' in the FAQ: https://bitsquare.io/faq/#altcoins

Factom can be traded already, but there seems to be not much volume.


Oh you can trade here already. I did not know that. Will try to check it out tomorrow thanks!
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Will Factom be on this exchange at launch?

You can find a list of 'Altcoins' in the FAQ: https://bitsquare.io/faq/#altcoins

Factom can be traded already, but there seems to be not much volume.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Will Factom be on this exchange at launch?
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
So the bounty has been paid out and you can now run Bitsquare on a RaspPi 2. Unfortunately it's said to be slow atm due to undetermined reasons.

You can find the bash script here: https://github.com/SjonHortensius/BitSquareOnRpi/blob/4154260cb302b479c84b3ff56fb78cb7fb2fe219/bitsquare.sh

I don't have a RaspPi 2 so I can't try it but maybe someone else wants to.
k99
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 255
Manfred Karrer
I'm offering a 1 BTC bounty for bitsquare on raspberry pi, more info posted here:
https://forum.bitsquare.io/t/1-btc-bounty-for-bitsquare-on-raspberry-pi/209

Bounty's now at 2.25 BTC. Awesome!

I add 500 XMR Monero to the bounty.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
I'm offering a 1 BTC bounty for bitsquare on raspberry pi, more info posted here:
https://forum.bitsquare.io/t/1-btc-bounty-for-bitsquare-on-raspberry-pi/209

Bounty's now at 2.25 BTC. Awesome!
sr. member
Activity: 278
Merit: 252
ABISprotocol on Gist
I'm offering a 1 BTC bounty for bitsquare on raspberry pi, more info posted here:
https://forum.bitsquare.io/t/1-btc-bounty-for-bitsquare-on-raspberry-pi/209

Just posted on my diaspora.

--> https://diasp.org/posts/5714405
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
I'm offering a 1 BTC bounty for bitsquare on raspberry pi, more info posted here:
https://forum.bitsquare.io/t/1-btc-bounty-for-bitsquare-on-raspberry-pi/209

Great bounty idea and thanks for your plans to support liquidity!
https://twitter.com/MoneroPromotion/status/741406710728773633
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
I'm offering a 1 BTC bounty for bitsquare on raspberry pi, more info posted here:
https://forum.bitsquare.io/t/1-btc-bounty-for-bitsquare-on-raspberry-pi/209
sr. member
Activity: 278
Merit: 252
ABISprotocol on Gist
I'm looking very forward to ongoing development of Bitsquare and have recently (well, late last year) brought it up in the BCN forum, at:

https://bytecointalk.org/showthread.php?tid=274

I'll be in touch via the github (will probably volunteer for testing which looks like it needs help?), translation, and mailing list.  Cheers!

Thanks.
I would love to support ByteCoin (and othere CryptoNote coins) but as the transaction cannot be verified by the arbitrator (in case of a dispute) on the blockchain (sender address is not visible) I cannot support it. I talked a bit to Monero guys and they told me it would be possibile but need some extra not yet implemented feature. I am not so familiar with ByteCoin but I think it will have the same issue as Monero.
So to summarize:
The requirement for adding CryptoNote coins is that a 3rd party (arbitrator in case of a dispute) is able to see on the blockchain if a transaction from the sender address to the receiver address has been done. 

As Monero is now supported -- https://bitsquare.io/faq/#altcoins -- and originally (as per the above discussion) it seemed that Bytecoin (BCN), Monero, and other similar coins had the issue of not being able to have some aspect of the transaction be verified by an arbitrator in case of a dispute on Bitsquare, it sounds like you have figured out a solution (with respect to Monero) which overcame this problem; which makes me wonder if also a similar avenue can also be explored with respect to BCN which would allow BCN to be supported.

Let me know a summary of what was the basic solution for Monero to get it included and how one could do the same for BCN.

Here is the info which gets displayed in Bitsquare:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1449498/15537245/7d6b7c5c-2275-11e6-9534-2d1073cf2d99.png

Thank you! This is helpful (link you provided above).  Will touch base with others (BCN developer community) and get back.
k99
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 255
Manfred Karrer
I'm looking very forward to ongoing development of Bitsquare and have recently (well, late last year) brought it up in the BCN forum, at:

https://bytecointalk.org/showthread.php?tid=274

I'll be in touch via the github (will probably volunteer for testing which looks like it needs help?), translation, and mailing list.  Cheers!

Thanks.
I would love to support ByteCoin (and othere CryptoNote coins) but as the transaction cannot be verified by the arbitrator (in case of a dispute) on the blockchain (sender address is not visible) I cannot support it. I talked a bit to Monero guys and they told me it would be possibile but need some extra not yet implemented feature. I am not so familiar with ByteCoin but I think it will have the same issue as Monero.
So to summarize:
The requirement for adding CryptoNote coins is that a 3rd party (arbitrator in case of a dispute) is able to see on the blockchain if a transaction from the sender address to the receiver address has been done. 

As Monero is now supported -- https://bitsquare.io/faq/#altcoins -- and originally (as per the above discussion) it seemed that Bytecoin (BCN), Monero, and other similar coins had the issue of not being able to have some aspect of the transaction be verified by an arbitrator in case of a dispute on Bitsquare, it sounds like you have figured out a solution (with respect to Monero) which overcame this problem; which makes me wonder if also a similar avenue can also be explored with respect to BCN which would allow BCN to be supported.

Let me know a summary of what was the basic solution for Monero to get it included and how one could do the same for BCN.

Here is the info which gets displayed in Bitsquare:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1449498/15537245/7d6b7c5c-2275-11e6-9534-2d1073cf2d99.png
k99
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 255
Manfred Karrer
Monero has a tool where you can get a transaction key which is used together with the receiver address to verify a transaction happened. The XMR sender need to provide the arbitrator in case of a dispute that tx key. In Monero you need to use simplewallet to get that key, and that extra tool to verify. If Bytecoin or any other CryptoNote coin can provide those or any other mechanism to make a tx verifyable for the arbitrator I am happy to add it.
Pages:
Jump to: