@staxxd i don't know why are you bringing this up, sparked already told everyone about this a month ago.
Also, it is gambling site, not charity organization, as chat is not moderated like other chats are moderated lots of things are tolerated, and i just don't see problem with +- or less rain - otherwise everyone would chat and nobody would play.
Ghost ban - what about it? It's the same shit as regular ban.
As long moderators are not abusing system i think it is ok. Moderators are ok.
If you would stop addressing me I would let the issue go but you keep bringing it back up and bringing me back into it. Of course, the mods who are allowed to abuse the system are going to defend it. I have seen first hands mods abuse the system so please stop saying it doesn't happen. I said I was done and happy that I got as close as it would come to what I was seeking from the admin so I am not sure about why my name keeps being brought up unless you wish me to continue to argue my side? There is no arguing that bitvest has been dishonest. I only hope they will not continue to be this way. I never said there was an issue with their system. The issue lies in the fact that they do not disclose their system with the users and forbid moderators from telling the truth while making claims that are entirely false. No one can claim that they told the truth because they did not and all I did was point out that they lied I did not say they were wrong for having the system in place. Only for lying about it. Stop accusing me of attacking them for giving out free rains like I am complaining about something that is free. I could care less about rains, I can afford to purchase bitcoins outright if I desire to do so. They lied, that is the point. Stop trying to make it seem like it is anything but that.
It wasn't my intention to accuse you of anything, i was just replying with my opinion.
Zodiac said...
This system is closely watched by all moderators. Any mod seen abusing their chat rating powers will be warned about it, or if it continues, removed from the moderation team. We do not tolerate abuse of power.
...so i figured there is no abuse.
And...
Meaning if a moderator likes or dislikes someone for any reason they have the power to make it more or less likely for any single user to be able to get rain. Meaning one or more mods can make it MUCH more likely for another mod or user to get rain than the others if they favor that user or MUCH less likely if they dislike this user.
...you said they can, not they did, which doesn't mean they are.
And now you are saying they did:
I have seen first hands mods abuse the system so please stop saying it doesn't happen.
I am confused by your posts. Did they or did they not?
On a side note
I think it is allowed to write opinion in this forum, so for every your post you can expect someone will post comment. After all, it's forum.