Still waiting for a response from admin and we both know you've seen my post. Time for a little honesty for a change, Bitvest.
Dude calm down Oo
It's been like... 1 hour since your previous post?
You know you'll probably have to wait for a day or two right? No company is going to answer you immediately!
Especially if you're being so... rude...
We are fully transparent about our bankroll, the stats tab very clearly shows the real amount invested, and the bankroll size it emulates from the margin. A further explanation of all details is also on our investments page (
https://bitvest.io/investing). If anything, we are one of the most transparent sites out there, we run a full proof of reserves, proof of liabilities (
https://bitvest.io/liabilities), and explain in detail how everything works.
As for the RainBot, it's random, but it favors those who it thinks are more constructive chatters. The exact way this is determined is kept secret so that users cannot abuse it for an unfair advantage. Also, the RainBot is mostly free money given out from the house with a portion coming from users who opt to tip the RainBot.
craked5 - No, I waited several hours. Please don't speak on things if you have no idea what you are talking about.
Zodiac1233 - And that is another false statement.
Your bankroll is a 5th of what it is claimed to be, to people to aren't fluent in english and don't feel like digging into the site and just take a glance at it you are misleading them to think you have over 1500 BTC BR and you do not.
USERS OF BITVEST PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ACTUAL REQ FOR RAIN ON THE SITE This is not a huge deal, but you have been lied to about it and the truth is the following -
Rain does not magically decide who is a more productive chatter and who is not. Moderators are able to give chatters a + or a - for whatever reasons they feel necessary. Meaning if a moderator likes or dislikes someone for any reason they have the power to make it more or less likely for any single user to be able to get rain. Meaning one or more mods can make it MUCH more likely for another mod or user to get rain than the others if they favor that user or MUCH less likely if they dislike this user. So the claim that rain is entirely random is completely false.
ALSO - AND MUCH MORE IMPORTANTLY Rain also discriminates against users based on the amount of tokens in the user's balance meaning if you have a higher token balance the rainbot is much less likely to choose you to receive rain than someone who has a lower balance. They do this to make it much less likely for someone to reach the 200k mark for a user to be able to convert.
The reason this is so shady is for example, if someone is wagering in BTC and chatting in the chat and have gotten some rains and has a decent amount of tokens in their balance while they are wagering their BTC the rainbot will notice they have a lot of tokens and stop allowing them to get rain and they are made to think they still have just as good of a shot at getting rain as any other user. This is deceptive and just plain misleading. Mods are told to lie and claim the rains are 100% random.
Unfortunate that some are mentally damaged to this tragic a degree of neurotic pathology :|
---------------------------------
In my experience BV rain & faucet seem decently distributed and have consistently made it reasonably easy to get a tiny amount into the 200k tokens required for conversion into
BTC. Once a user has a little nest, they ought to build it up to be able to ^convert, via
actually betting.
Otherwise.. what? It's free money so it would seem to make sense that at least some gambling/risk with it would be required before it's able to be withdrawn from the site.. I mean it's not like BV generates ad traffic revenue.
But - If one tests it out, and starts getting the feeling they're wasting their time chatting/faucet-claiming - because the site is being deceptive or for any other reason - the foremost and straight-up thing to do is to get the hell out of there asap & go chat/claim elsewhere.
Lastly I recommend to admins of any site that features
margin-leveraged bankroll investment - or any use in general of margin leverage for that matter - that they ensure this mechanism is
prominently featured and well documented in easy-of-access tooltips/menus on their GUI.
This will help avoid giving the impression that admins are displaying an inflated bankroll if in reality its size is much smaller and is only being displayed as several times the actual BTC amount invested
because of the x2-x5+ investment margin-leverage mechanism.