Pages:
Author

Topic: [BITZ] The Only 10% PoS Crypto to have - page 18. (Read 81866 times)

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





I was curious as to who is criticising me and so I had a look at your contribution to crypto and this forum. So you have posted 285 posts and whats interesting is that most of what you post is off-topic and asking for giveaways and you have posted an identical post 64 times in "★☆★ 777coin.com - The Modern Bitcoin Casino! ★☆★ [Free 2 mBTC][Get Yours Now!]" - "Username: WillyBTC, daily. thanks."

Could that be to get a higher status?

What qualifies you to assess and to criticise cryptos? What coins have you worked on?

As I said I appreciate constructive criticism and I will reply to that.



Lol this is the bitcointalkforums man. Nobody needs a crypto *criticize* license. haha while we are at it let me criticize the dev that doesn't know how to spell.




So what if someone cannot spell, are you a child?  It is not a positive or progressive thing to highlight the shortcomings in people in the way you have.


Look, I can spell, it's Gumbork that is ignorant to regional spelling variations in the English language and he is trying to get at me but comes off as the dimwit himself.
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





I was curious as to who is criticising me and so I had a look at your contribution to crypto and this forum. So you have posted 285 posts and whats interesting is that most of what you post is off-topic and asking for giveaways and you have posted an identical post 64 times in "★☆★ 777coin.com - The Modern Bitcoin Casino! ★☆★ [Free 2 mBTC][Get Yours Now!]" - "Username: WillyBTC, daily. thanks."

Could that be to get a higher status?

What qualifies you to assess and to criticise cryptos? What coins have you worked on?

As I said I appreciate constructive criticism and I will reply to that.



Lol this is the bitcointalkforums man. Nobody needs a crypto *criticize* license. haha while we are at it let me criticize the dev that doesn't know how to spell.




So what if someone cannot spell, are you a child?  It is not a positive or progressive thing to highlight the shortcomings in people in the way you have.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





I was curious as to who is criticising me and so I had a look at your contribution to crypto and this forum. So you have posted 285 posts and whats interesting is that most of what you post is off-topic and asking for giveaways and you have posted an identical post 64 times in "★☆★ 777coin.com - The Modern Bitcoin Casino! ★☆★ [Free 2 mBTC][Get Yours Now!]" - "Username: WillyBTC, daily. thanks."

Could that be to get a higher status?

What qualifies you to assess and to criticise cryptos? What coins have you worked on?

As I said I appreciate constructive criticism and I will reply to that.


Lol this is the bitcointalkforums man. Nobody needs a crypto *criticize* license. haha while we are at it let me criticize the dev that doesn't know how to spell.

Thnak yuo, oh yeah, the z and s thing is an English thing, I'm in England not US, just to inform you that in British English the z as you use in US is replaced by an s
hero member
Activity: 583
Merit: 500
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





I was curious as to who is criticising me and so I had a look at your contribution to crypto and this forum. So you have posted 285 posts and whats interesting is that most of what you post is off-topic and asking for giveaways and you have posted an identical post 64 times in "★☆★ 777coin.com - The Modern Bitcoin Casino! ★☆★ [Free 2 mBTC][Get Yours Now!]" - "Username: WillyBTC, daily. thanks."

Could that be to get a higher status?

What qualifies you to assess and to criticise cryptos? What coins have you worked on?

As I said I appreciate constructive criticism and I will reply to that.


Lol this is the bitcointalkforums man. Nobody needs a crypto *criticize* license. haha while we are at it let me criticize the dev that doesn't know how to spell.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





I was curious as to who is criticising me and so I had a look at your contribution to crypto and this forum. So you have posted 285 posts and whats interesting is that most of what you post is off-topic and asking for giveaways and you have posted an identical post 64 times in "★☆★ 777coin.com - The Modern Bitcoin Casino! ★☆★ [Free 2 mBTC][Get Yours Now!]" - "Username: WillyBTC, daily. thanks."

Could that be to get a higher status?

What qualifies you to assess and to criticise cryptos? What coins have you worked on?

As I said I appreciate constructive criticism and I will reply to that.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
need more volume market at c-cex....
  Embarrassed

I'm aware that C-cex has marked Bitz for delisting, I wouldn't worry to much, we'll sort it out and there is always YoBit and Cryptopia. I will get us onto Bittrex as well in the the near future. I am doing the Coinsource verification today at some point and that will help a bit and I'll see what else I can do to keep Bitz on C-Cex.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1009
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
need more volume market at c-cex....
  Embarrassed
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Just waiting for Whitepaper.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





People will invest wherever they want I guess


dev go ahead and get coinssource verified please. I think we have called you out to be pretty hypocritical of yourself. time is ticking, and the more time that goes by the more you look like an idiot. It took you months to write that pos whitepaper that is super scammish and shaddy. [size=20pt]we need you to verify your developers too, how do we know you aren't just the same person on the other account?[/size] you said it yourself people buy accounts. the fact that you use that to try to defend yourself even sounds kinda scammish. its like you are waving a red flag saying you follow people that sell accounts, why would you EVEN say something like that. the bitstone dev is a newbie account, how does that look like they bought it. you are a flaming idiot bro.



HELLO PLEASE ADDRESS THIS PLEASE!!! I SPENT THE TIME READING YOUR WHITEPAPER AND WAS ABOUT TO INVEST. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THIS?HuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuh



Hi, the dev is legit. If you read this thread then you'll think that too...

Yeah right man.

I was thinking about buying some of these but wtf is up with the whitepaper? You have some very alarming things in here, that are so contradictory its screaming scam!

Allow me to expose you, and I await your reply.

First Alarm~

Why do you like to operate like that? Why don't you want to be open with your community?

Second Alarm~

If you don't want your community of users to be anon, why do you the devs get to be?

Third Alarm~

Let me get this straight, you understand being anon can hurt your coin and community? Who wrote this crazy scam writepaper? Has a bunch of bs about you floating around in my head Huh

Forth Alarm~

Well, I guess you think everyone is just plain stupid huh? Looks like the whole community here is just stupid as heck to believe that this guy is legit after reading that whitepaper. You say in your whitepaper that you want to be transparent, but you are looking pretty contradictory in every sense.

After reading this, and seeing how you act in other threads as I was looking over your post history, I will be reporting this thread to coinssource and having them contact you to become verified. If you choose not to they will post that you declined, and will be broadcasted to the crypto community that you are being very shady.

You say:

we need you to verify your developers too, how do we know you aren't just the same person on the other account?

I only have one account, which other account are you talking about please?

You seem to be a bit emotional and ramble on, you talk about a premine but there is no copy from the source code to back up your claim.

I obviously didn't say that the newbie account had been bought, I say that others account, like yours maybe, could have been bought. I wasn't aware of this problem until recently. You really need to read things better and understand before you start shouting as you are the one that will be seen as the idiot.

You are not able to distinguish between the properties of a crypto and transactions on the blockchain and issues around identity of users on this forum.

I have addressed all your concerns now, please post copy of the source code where the premine is set and the name of the other account you are referring to?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
why haven't you gotten pod done yet dev?

Because it costs money and I couldn't pay, I have now paid $50,- to coinsource and will do that today
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





People will invest wherever they want I guess


dev go ahead and get coinssource verified please. I think we have called you out to be pretty hypocritical of yourself. time is ticking, and the more time that goes by the more you look like an idiot. It took you months to write that pos whitepaper that is super scammish and shaddy. we need you to verify your developers too, how do we know you aren't just the same person on the other account? you said it yourself people buy accounts. the fact that you use that to try to defend yourself even sounds kinda scammish. its like you are waving a red flag saying you follow people that sell accounts, why would you EVEN say something like that. the bitstone dev is a newbie account, how does that look like they bought it. you are a flaming idiot bro.



HELLO PLEASE ADDRESS THIS PLEASE!!! I SPENT THE TIME READING YOUR WHITEPAPER AND WAS ABOUT TO INVEST. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THIS?HuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuh



Hi, the dev is legit. If you read this thread then you'll think that too...

Yeah right man.

I was thinking about buying some of these but wtf is up with the whitepaper? You have some very alarming things in here, that are so contradictory its screaming scam!

Allow me to expose you, and I await your reply.

First Alarm~

Why do you like to operate like that? Why don't you want to be open with your community?

Second Alarm~

If you don't want your community of users to be anon, why do you the devs get to be?

Third Alarm~

Let me get this straight, you understand being anon can hurt your coin and community? Who wrote this crazy scam writepaper? Has a bunch of bs about you floating around in my head Huh

Forth Alarm~

Well, I guess you think everyone is just plain stupid huh? Looks like the whole community here is just stupid as heck to believe that this guy is legit after reading that whitepaper. You say in your whitepaper that you want to be transparent, but you are looking pretty contradictory in every sense.

After reading this, and seeing how you act in other threads as I was looking over your post history, I will be reporting this thread to coinssource and having them contact you to become verified. If you choose not to they will post that you declined, and will be broadcasted to the crypto community that you are being very shady.

I did respond, you just didn't read it, just after your post, I'l respond again, and I am doing the Coinsource today. You haven't read the whitepaper properly though with regards to the anonymity issue. It would be helpful if you read it and understood it before you made comments, but hey...

I will do the verification on Coinsource in the next few days. I just don't have any Bitcoins to pay for it right now.

I've been around for a while, here is copy of the Localbitcoins profile for now:


We are not working to make Bitz transactions anonymous, it's like Bitcoin or Litecoin. We are not going to develop Bitz along the lines of Dash etc.

I don't mind verifying my identity to trusted people, like Localbitcoins or Coinsource but I won't identify myself to the whole online community as I am sure you don't either. If you disagree then post your name, photo and home address.

The fact that Bitz transactions are anonymous in same way as Bitcoin without seeking to hide transactions is a separate issue from me not identifying myself to you. I use debit cards, bank accounts etc. I have no desire to stay anonymous as such. I have a job and pay taxes. I just think that trying to develop a crypto like Dash or others is counterproductive as when it really matters or if you use it for something really bad they will track you anyway.

I am open with the community but normal online caution apply. I will do the Coinsource though.

There is no premine. Please, where in the code is the premine?

I mined when it was launched and the 100,000 Bitz is for anyone that wants to contribute, it's not for me.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Thug for life!
why haven't you gotten pod done yet dev?
sr. member
Activity: 241
Merit: 250
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





People will invest wherever they want I guess


dev go ahead and get coinssource verified please. I think we have called you out to be pretty hypocritical of yourself. time is ticking, and the more time that goes by the more you look like an idiot. It took you months to write that pos whitepaper that is super scammish and shaddy. we need you to verify your developers too, how do we know you aren't just the same person on the other account? you said it yourself people buy accounts. the fact that you use that to try to defend yourself even sounds kinda scammish. its like you are waving a red flag saying you follow people that sell accounts, why would you EVEN say something like that. the bitstone dev is a newbie account, how does that look like they bought it. you are a flaming idiot bro.



HELLO PLEASE ADDRESS THIS PLEASE!!! I SPENT THE TIME READING YOUR WHITEPAPER AND WAS ABOUT TO INVEST. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THIS?HuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuh



Hi, the dev is legit. If you read this thread then you'll think that too...

Yeah right man.

I was thinking about buying some of these but wtf is up with the whitepaper? You have some very alarming things in here, that are so contradictory its screaming scam!

Allow me to expose you, and I await your reply.

First Alarm~

Why do you like to operate like that? Why don't you want to be open with your community?

Second Alarm~

If you don't want your community of users to be anon, why do you the devs get to be?

Third Alarm~

Let me get this straight, you understand being anon can hurt your coin and community? Who wrote this crazy scam writepaper? Has a bunch of bs about you floating around in my head Huh

Forth Alarm~

Well, I guess you think everyone is just plain stupid huh? Looks like the whole community here is just stupid as heck to believe that this guy is legit after reading that whitepaper. You say in your whitepaper that you want to be transparent, but you are looking pretty contradictory in every sense.

After reading this, and seeing how you act in other threads as I was looking over your post history, I will be reporting this thread to coinssource and having them contact you to become verified. If you choose not to they will post that you declined, and will be broadcasted to the crypto community that you are being very shady.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.





People will invest wherever they want I guess
sr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 250
This is not about any one coin, you do it to a lot of coins.  And I read your thread about BitStone- I do believe that was corrected and you stated you would stop the FUD.  From what I can see, you started with additional FUD after that- you lied.  What about your criticism of Circuits- you accuse people of getting paid, state same developers, and ask for others to identify themselves.  More of the same on Twelve and the list goes on.  I do recall you asking Private Investors to Show their identity, but you will not.  I think you accomplished something with BitStone but you continue attacking it and Circuits.  Who would invest in a coin where the Dev is more worried about others coins and not his own.



legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
I take the criticism onboard, but what I have come to realise is that this forum is full of fraud. I am not a fraud, you can think what you want.

What I realised is that Sr.member, jr.member and other accounts are bought and sold all the time. I followed a user that posted recently and found that his sole purpose on the forum was to trade accounts.

You simply do not know who to trust anymore.

I welcome constructive criticism of course and I do not have a moderated thread as I welcome free speech. What I get is vindictive behaviour which is to be expected and it's fine because anyone can see through it.

I will answer any criticism as far as I can and I will get verified.

I was annoyed at getting censored just for pointing out that the structure of the Bitstone ICO was like Paycoin.
sr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 250
I have been reading your post on multiple coin threads, including this one.  One thing is apparent, you have a chip on your shoulder and like bashing others coins.  I find it appalling that you post crap about peoples hard work, you spread FUD and insult people on their threads.  I got tired after reading it on 4 different coin threads.  Why is your demeanor different on your coins thread?  A little advice from another guy with a little time in crypto-  take care of your business and stop taking care of others.  I noticed it took you a few months to write a whitepaper AFTER the coin was released, well maybe you could have done it sooner if you weren't trying to be the JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER of everyone else.  It might help the value of Bitz and it could be worth more than 200 sats with low to no trading volume.

Just my 2 cents
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
I will do the verification on Coinsource in the next few days. I just don't have any Bitcoins to pay for it right now.

I've been around for a while, here is copy of the Localbitcoins profile for now:


We are not working to make Bitz transactions anonymous, it's like Bitcoin or Litecoin. We are not going to develop Bitz along the lines of Dash etc.

I don't mind verifying my identity to trusted people, like Localbitcoins or Coinsource but I won't identify myself to the whole online community as I am sure you don't either. If you disagree then post your name, photo and home address.

The fact that Bitz transactions are anonymous in same way as Bitcoin without seeking to hide transactions is a separate issue from me not identifying myself to you. I use debit cards, bank accounts etc. I have no desire to stay anonymous as such. I have a job and pay taxes. I just think that trying to develop a crypto like Dash or others is counterproductive as when it really matters or if you use it for something really bad they will track you anyway.

I am open with the community but normal online caution apply. I will do the Coinsource though.

There is no premine. Please, where in the code is the premine?

I mined when it was launched and the 100,000 Bitz is for anyone that wants to contribute, it's not for me.
hero member
Activity: 583
Merit: 500
Hi, the dev is legit. If you read this thread then you'll think that too...

Yeah right man.

I was thinking about buying some of these but wtf is up with the whitepaper? You have some very alarming things in here, that are so contradictory its screaming scam!

Allow me to expose you, and I await your reply.

First Alarm~

Why do you like to operate like that? Why don't you want to be open with your community?

Second Alarm~

If you don't want your community of users to be anon, why do you the devs get to be?

Third Alarm~

Let me get this straight, you understand being anon can hurt your coin and community? Who wrote this crazy scam writepaper? Has a bunch of bs about you floating around in my head Huh

Forth Alarm~

Well, I guess you think everyone is just plain stupid huh? Looks like the whole community here is just stupid as heck to believe that this guy is legit after reading that whitepaper. You say in your whitepaper that you want to be transparent, but you are looking pretty contradictory in every sense.

After reading this, and seeing how you act in other threads as I was looking over your post history, I will be reporting this thread to coinssource and having them contact you to become verified. If you choose not to they will post that you declined, and will be broadcasted to the crypto community that you are being very shady.

haha what a good call out of the dev. I have a question, what is the dev doing with the huge premine of 100,000?
sr. member
Activity: 241
Merit: 250
Hi, the dev is legit. If you read this thread then you'll think that too...

Yeah right man.

I was thinking about buying some of these but wtf is up with the whitepaper? You have some very alarming things in here, that are so contradictory its screaming scam!

Allow me to expose you, and I await your reply.

First Alarm~

Why do you like to operate like that? Why don't you want to be open with your community?

Second Alarm~

If you don't want your community of users to be anon, why do you the devs get to be?

Third Alarm~

Let me get this straight, you understand being anon can hurt your coin and community? Who wrote this crazy scam writepaper? Has a bunch of bs about you floating around in my head Huh

Forth Alarm~

Well, I guess you think everyone is just plain stupid huh? Looks like the whole community here is just stupid as heck to believe that this guy is legit after reading that whitepaper. You say in your whitepaper that you want to be transparent, but you are looking pretty contradictory in every sense.

After reading this, and seeing how you act in other threads as I was looking over your post history, I will be reporting this thread to coinssource and having them contact you to become verified. If you choose not to they will post that you declined, and will be broadcasted to the crypto community that you are being very shady.
Pages:
Jump to: