Topic: Black Arrow R9-12 threads, DZ Miners Co-op. Plz move ?s and discussion here. - page 20. (Read 25197 times)
December 02, 2013, 07:57:03 PM
is it 80 boards for 900 = 72000K?
December 02, 2013, 07:49:38 PM
bob sorry I don't know the original price, number of boards, etc; 
I just know what I paid you. Given that price what would the USD per share be for us?
I just know what I paid you. Given that price what would the USD per share be for us? December 02, 2013, 07:42:10 PM
first off the buy has done roi in usd terms.
I am in a funny spot as I have an 11 spot of shares here R9-r12 and 19 shares in r5+r6.
I just got 2.5btc on sunday between the arrows and the knc. I am beyond roi in terms of usd.
So In one way if DzCoop sold both knc's and all the ARROWS FOR A GOOD PRICE I would see a lot of cash. As always I am A half loaf guy… I don't want to hold all and just mine and I do not want to sell all. I am like split the thing in two. Sell some gear and keep some gear. this way if btc goes to 10000 we do well and if btc drops to 100 we do well. My 2 cents.
The offer per board was $900+ each. I am in a funny spot as I have an 11 spot of shares here R9-r12 and 19 shares in r5+r6.
I just got 2.5btc on sunday between the arrows and the knc. I am beyond roi in terms of usd.
So In one way if DzCoop sold both knc's and all the ARROWS FOR A GOOD PRICE I would see a lot of cash. As always I am A half loaf guy… I don't want to hold all and just mine and I do not want to sell all. I am like split the thing in two. Sell some gear and keep some gear. this way if btc goes to 10000 we do well and if btc drops to 100 we do well. My 2 cents.
December 02, 2013, 07:15:24 PM
deleted post
December 02, 2013, 06:15:29 PM
I vote to hang in there, yes its a lil less, yes ill ROI just fine at this rate.
but yes if offer good enough to cash out....
but yes if offer good enough to cash out....
December 02, 2013, 06:13:32 PM
I guess it depends on how good the offer is for the boards.
December 02, 2013, 06:10:45 PM
Payouts happened and they are running the Jupiter to boost our hash rate. What more are you expecting exactly?
8.34 GH/s per share minimum. Now speed is no more than 7 GH/s.Worker 1 Hash Rate 2313.632 Gh/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 0 Gh/s
Worker 3 Hash Rate 520.13 Gh/s
Now is 2833GH/s, promised is 3336 GH/s
P.S. OMG, not now, last two weeks speed is the same
You have a good point, no one is trying to dismiss you.
I have been working on these boards, and as you can see from "Worker1" they are way under, even with my personal Jupiter running.
We have several options here:
-I can continue to work at it, but the fact is these bitfury boards (and the chips in general) are not reliable hashers. We can do a small BTC refund for the less than promised hash rate (to be distributed in the next payout)
-I have received an offer to purchase all the boards I have in $, and I can sell them then divide up all the money evenly between 400 shares and refund everyone the appropriate BTC at the exchange rate.
Thoughts yall?
EDIT: I am trying to be as upfront and transparent as I can here, I have just been absolutely swamped the last few days (holidays + trip to china + see barntech's thread)
December 02, 2013, 03:56:04 PM
Payouts happened and they are running the Jupiter to boost our hash rate. What more are you expecting exactly?
8.34 GH/s per share minimum. Now speed is no more than 7 GH/s.Worker 1 Hash Rate 2313.632 Gh/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 0 Gh/s
Worker 3 Hash Rate 520.13 Gh/s
Now is 2833GH/s, promised is 3336 GH/s
P.S. OMG, not now, last two weeks speed is the same
December 02, 2013, 03:30:47 PM
Payouts happened and they are running the Jupiter to boost our hash rate. What more are you expecting exactly?
December 02, 2013, 03:17:29 PM
And we need compensations to 8.34 GH/s
Bump December 01, 2013, 03:18:26 PM
And we need compensations to 8.34 GH/s
December 01, 2013, 04:46:50 AM
Has the payout happened yet? I haven't seen mine come in yet.
November 30, 2013, 06:50:11 PM
Looks like they rebooted them earlier and they are climbing back up. Not sure what you mean, they have bent over backwards to deliver the promised hash and have refunded us for lost hashing time.
He just means that the hashrate isn't really hitting the promised minimum most of the time, usually it's hanging out a little below what it should really be at, even when most of the stacks are supposedly working I've only seen it get up to about 3200Ghash. Right now it looks like it's at 7Ghash per share on the site. I think the bitfury boards have been a lot more problematic than expected, everyone was hoping that they'd be overclockable to 10Ghash a share but the boards are so unstable it's nearly impossible to get even 8.34 per share. I haven't actually seen only bitfury boards hashing away at over 8.34ghash per share, the only time we ever hit that hashrate was with the KnC Jupiters thrown in to hit the goal rate. Hopefully whatever software or hardware issues get worked out, but so far it seems like bitfury is really hard to keep running reliably vs the other hardware out there. November 30, 2013, 02:05:58 PM
interesting I have seen this under reporting quirk quite I bit.. Lots of pools and lots of different gear and software. I saw back in aug 2012 and in dec 2012 and more recently. So we kind of have a fully custom setup….. Should we pick up more pi's to switch in and out.
12629 --- 1,358,080 In Progress
12628 0.18627% 2,241,152 2013-11-30 05:34 PM
12627 0.16445% 1,977,152 2013-11-30 04:40 PM
12626 0.10132% 1,219,392 2013-11-30 03:46 PM
12625 0.09961% 1,205,760 2013-11-30 02:51 PM
12624 0.10096% 1,219,072 2013-11-30 01:57 PM
12623 0.09995% 1,199,552 2013-11-30 01:02 PM
12622 0.18523% 2,231,104 2013-11-30 12:09 PM
12621 0.19960% 2,405,504 2013-11-30 11:15 AM
Like wtf? By the time I was up and got over to the warehouse, they fixed themselves. Our 24 hour earnings never changed tho...
yep this is what I have seen on other pools such as bit minter with the bit minter java client and with the bfgminer client. now a day or 2 ago bitminter had 8 or 9 stale mmc blocks in a row. so these under hash/ vanished block bugs have occurred before.
November 30, 2013, 01:37:24 PM
interesting I have seen this under reporting quirk quite I bit.. Lots of pools and lots of different gear and software. I saw back in aug 2012 and in dec 2012 and more recently. So we kind of have a fully custom setup….. Should we pick up more pi's to switch in and out.
12629 --- 1,358,080 In Progress
12628 0.18627% 2,241,152 2013-11-30 05:34 PM
12627 0.16445% 1,977,152 2013-11-30 04:40 PM
12626 0.10132% 1,219,392 2013-11-30 03:46 PM
12625 0.09961% 1,205,760 2013-11-30 02:51 PM
12624 0.10096% 1,219,072 2013-11-30 01:57 PM
12623 0.09995% 1,199,552 2013-11-30 01:02 PM
12622 0.18523% 2,231,104 2013-11-30 12:09 PM
12621 0.19960% 2,405,504 2013-11-30 11:15 AM
Like wtf? By the time I was up and got over to the warehouse, they fixed themselves. Our 24 hour earnings never changed tho...
November 30, 2013, 01:24:29 PM
delete
November 30, 2013, 10:59:28 AM
Worker 1 Hash Rate 1077.216 Gh/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 0 Gh/s
Worker 3 Hash Rate 534.179 Gh/s
What happened with
All the time hashrate is below 3336 GH/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 0 Gh/s
Worker 3 Hash Rate 534.179 Gh/s
What happened with
Quote
minimum 8.34 GH/s hashrate
?All the time hashrate is below 3336 GH/s
BTC guild shows ~1.5thash.... yet all the pis are 100%, we should be at 3.3thash. Ill look into it.
this has occurred with bitminter and bitminter java client. started to happen with the red fury usb stick.. the local in house number would read 2.5 and the mining site reports 1.6. and I would get paid 1.6 not the 2.5 while it is a different chip and a different mining pool I found it odd that a similar problem happens. I wonder if some one has found a way to divert hash power . or there is a bug that is going across different clients and different pools. What is our software client here cgminer/ bfgminer or minepeon? Do you want a pc to run this instead of a pi? I have 3 pc's on hand I only need 1.
Has to run on a PI, and the run currently Runs a highly modified by BA version of chainminer.
November 30, 2013, 10:42:11 AM
delete
November 30, 2013, 10:16:29 AM
Worker 1 Hash Rate 1077.216 Gh/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 0 Gh/s
Worker 3 Hash Rate 534.179 Gh/s
What happened with
All the time hashrate is below 3336 GH/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 0 Gh/s
Worker 3 Hash Rate 534.179 Gh/s
What happened with
Quote
minimum 8.34 GH/s hashrate
?All the time hashrate is below 3336 GH/s
BTC guild shows ~1.5thash.... yet all the pis are 100%, we should be at 3.3thash. Ill look into it.
November 30, 2013, 09:36:30 AM
Looks like they rebooted them earlier and they are climbing back up. Not sure what you mean, they have bent over backwards to deliver the promised hash and have refunded us for lost hashing time.
Jump to: