Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 102. (Read 10495 times)
Well ofcourse that they are popular because you can earn solid amount of $ on them especialy if you are from some country that doesnt have high average paycheck.Atm only signature bounty can earn you some money unless you have a masive amount of twitter bots
I do not think that this will have a big impact on us because we will continue to participate, but that's how much we will get less.
Sooner or later this was to happen. I do not see this as a big problem, just a reward will be distributed among a large number of people, but the tasks should be less
I think that at such rates we will soon choose and participate in the bounty in a certain and then the number of participants will reach a certain number of example participants will be 500
Well, in the near future I believe that at such a rate it will not be very pleasant to work for such a small amount then that the more large the pool, the fewer tokens.
I participate in signature campaigns for more than half of a year - and yes, the number of participants slightly increased, but profits are still good.
Yes, I often notice that the more participants in the bounty the less we then get money from them but the popularity increases with them.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
It depends on the campaign and manager.
Good managers define a limit for participant number because they understand that bounty hunters need to make something otherwise they wont come back to his next bounties.
And - dont be lazy , if you go to bountyhive , you will earn pennies, if you do your research you will make a lot more.
There are a lot of participants in the reward activities, and each participant can get a small share of the reward, and the ico market is not very good at present, so I should not participate more in the short term.
Bounty managers must deal with this problem. Of course, the more participants, the better for the campaign, but the less will be the final award. Bounty is gaining in popularity. I think that this type of earnings will soon cease to exist.
I agree, with too many people a lot won't invest in ICOs and the market will be stuck for weeks
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
People are looking for free money, or making cryptocurrency as their work. If you think that you will gain less with so much participants, then you should look for an ICO with no participants, sharing our knowledge and source of income is not bad, you just need to do their job and do yours.
Investors joining bounties are their freedom to do so. But most investors are people who earned from cryptocurrencies and bounties too.
It doesn't matter if a bounty has too many participants. When you find a bounty which has many participants, it means that the bounty has a very good project. Thus there are many participants who are interested in joining the bounty. If you're afraid of getting less rewards because of more participants, then you can find another one. I think anyone has the right to participate in any bounties.
Hi. Join airdrop and bounty campaign of LuckyToken. There are not many participants. for the present
Well in bounty campaigns the main reason for starting bounty campaigns is to attract more people towards the campaign so that they can work for the company. I don't think its bad to be in a huge number for bounty campaigns.
Thats why I like limited campaigns, first you check how much tokens allocated for social media bounty, and at the end of the campaign you see 5000 participants))) the reward will be about 50$ 
not all the time of course
not all the time of course A lot of people are participating in bounties to get some free money, all people want to earn money. I think that you can try to choose a bounty manager with good ICO, who has strict rules and also choose bounty campaigns that limit the number of participants.
Already very many participants in all the Campaign of Bounty and earnings fell even more than the market of crypto currency.
Well, I agree with you there are too many new participants in the market now and this reduce the rewards of others. But i do not think that this can reduce the potential buyers, because if the project is good, the buyers can work for bounty and invest in tokens.
this community earns a big population last 2017 due to the demand of bitcoin, we cannot stop the population increase here in this forum as long as some users spreads a word about this. we can only stop it by staying silent about this site so the population wont grow anymore.
A lot of people are participating in bounties to get some free money, all people want to earn money. I think that you can try to choose a bounty manager with good ICO, who has strict rules and also choose bounty campaigns that limit the number of participants.
you are right this needs to have regulation. the more participant in a single campaign the lesser the reward a participant will earn. at least limit the participant not from what rank he/she is in bitcointalk forum but in the number in the participants to be accepted.
Jump to: