Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 133. (Read 10495 times)
Every day the number of companies increases, respectively, and the number of people who want to earn. Soon everything will change - how the social network will start to ban advertising Ico. And earn will those who has good channels with traffic! As always, the strongest will survive)
Hi guys, and what do you think about that Google will ban ICO and crypto advertisement? After Facebook banned this type of advertisement Google will do the same. I am not very happy that this will come, there are many good ICOs with good potential and they have to pay for the mistakes of others? How new potential buyers will get to know about good ICOs? Maybe there will be bounty hunters, which will do this job better than ever. More high quality ICO websites, Twitter and Telegram channels?
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
On my mind the tempo of new bounties campaigns appearance a little higher than the increasing of number of users who wants to participate in campaigns. So this is not a problem. There are enough of campaigns are available.
You needn't worry about it. The more the merrier. Because the bounty can bring you profit without investment, so the number of participants has strongly increased. I think you should care more about the "quality" of the projects
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think they must limit the participant in every campaign to avoid the less reward of every participants because it is not worth it if they will get small amount of payment even if they join at the very beginning they will just get like 10-20 token for every participant do you think it is worth it and the price is just 1$ this is the only solution that I see so that we will have a good payment for every bounty. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Recently, a lot of people really began to observe a large number of participants in the forum. This number is constantly increasing and probably will increase further, I am very glad that we introduced Merit
That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.
I totally support you on this, what OP was trying to implement is creating an unfriendly community and environment to new members of the community and potentially new investors. This will discourage newcomers, and will stunt the growth of community supporters, and consequently the market.
Any project or undertaking grows more and shines brightly by creating a healthy environment for all, even newcomers.
Your observation was right. Since the beginning of this year the bounty participant has greatly increased and it is actually impacting on reward the bounty hunters are getting. For instance the Article/Blogs campaign is having much hunters which has made the managers to reject many entries compare to what it used to be. But I am not selfish I think there should be measures to regulate new entries to the forum.
everyday always born newbie in this forum. the good news is more people know about crypto. the bad news is the reward we got is getting smaller. but i think it's depending on our own efforts.
Twitter, telegram and facebook campaigns are way to crowded these days. its becourse there are chinese farmers creating 1000 diffrent accounts for a very low payout. The only thing worth joining is a signature campaign which can be quite profitable.
I think that this is not a problem. The number of new projects is increasing every year. The number of participants is also growing. Do not worry about it.
Aside from bitcoin popularity more and more people are now beginning to become curious and interested in joining.. not just investor, but also participants in bounty campaign, the more participant the lesser or smaller the possible profit each could get or earned...there has to be some limitation like in one campaign like 150-300 participant only..well again it's still depend on the rules of the bounty campaign.
I think they've considered the sharing of bounty results, the more bounty ico participants are getting crowded and that's good, nothing is set up anymore
That is how it should be imo. As many people as possible should be able to get hold of whatever they put in the work for. Investors will invest, hunters will hunt. There should be incentive for every act here. Distribution is good. Embrace it. Thats how things will look with time when the mass adoption comes.
It is a good idea if the number of participants will be limited so that bounty hunters will enjoy the bounty campaigns, bounties from the last years are too different. The problem will only be resolve by these campaign managers as they are the ones who are responsible for the rules in each bounty campaigns, that is why we need to pm them so that they will know our concerns
Yep, The good thing about the huge number of participants joining in bounty campaign is that it will make the ICO project to be more successful since there are many who are doing the campaign. This will make the ICO developer happier than before since the bounty reward is still the same
Bounty rewards are indeed getting smaller because the participants are too big and most of these people are using multiple accounts so tis so unfair for those people who has small ranking accounts. I really think the same, bounties are far less compare to the early years which you can enjoy rewards today most of the people are joinin bounty campaigns also those investors in ICOs
It is a good idea if the number of participants will be limited so that bounty hunters will enjoy the bounty campaigns, bounties from the last years are too different. The problem will only be resolve by these campaign managers as they are the ones who are responsible for the rules in each bounty campaigns, that is why we need to pm them so that they will know our concerns
Some of the project wanted that to happen because the more participants they have the bigger possibility that their project spread and become known.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
That's one of the criteria on looking for good bounty campaigns that has high probability of getting high bounty stake tokens because when the ICO and bounty campaign are very popular then there would be more bounty participants but in this case, bounty stake tokens will be divided on the number of participants, so, chances are, bounty participants will only get a little bounty stakes upon distribution.
The best thing way to do in bounty in the future will all the manager of the bounty campaign will surely put a limit in every bounty campaign that they are managing. In that way they can minimise all the bounty hunters who participate in bounty.
Jump to: