Bounty and too many participants - page 130.

fosco333

full member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 100

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

i don't think so. Not everyone can join twitter and facebook campaign because they have to pass some rules.
twitter have twitter audit. if the new comers doesn't have real followers, they cannot eligible to participate.
And other campaign have other rules too.

Freezingel

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 251

A lot of participants is good for the project because they want to spread the news as far as possible and having a lot of participants csn certainly help. It's different though for the participant because they will get less reward than before. I think the project has to be more strict in their rule to raise the quality of their project and prevent a lot of people from cheating.

suzane18

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 2

Bounty programs have lot of participants but the way popularity of Bitcoin is increasing more and more people are adopting to cryptocurrency and in future there will be all the more participants in bounty campaigns

kobe24

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 250

www.cd3d.app

Tell me how can you choose a best participant on social media campaign? Most participants do the same thing so it's hard to choose among them.

kayvie

sr. member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 257

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

indeed, bounty campaigns is not strict about the numbers of bounty participants.
but bounty participants has also their rights to join those bounty campaigns. as long as there is no restrictions or limit for it it wont stop bounty participants to join.

Bernardo lewanusa

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 100

more participants are better for the success of the project itself.
but for the distribution of his rewards seem a little bit, because of the allocation for the bounty jumlaj is shared for many participants.
there are positive and negative values.

nasipadang

sr. member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 252

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

The selection of the best participants depends on how the campaign manager made the rules that can produce the best bounty participants, I do not really pay attention to how many campaigners, but more to choose a good project to invest2

dinhbiplus

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 1

I think that this is not a problem. The number of new projects is increasing every year. The number of participants is also growing. Do not worry about it.

idioma1

newbie

Activity: 266

Merit: 0

Good thoughts but how ICO hoders can define the best one?

kuah bakso

newbie

Activity: 184

Merit: 0

I think it is the policy of each dev that regulates the rule of bounty, we can not do anything because it proves more bounty participants then the more likely the project will be successful so we can only surrender

sweetmakak

jr. member

Activity: 39

Merit: 1

I really hope that either the people themselves will leave, because there is not enough patience and will not earn enough, or there will be some restrictions ...

Blake_Last

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 278

Actually, for me, I think it is better for an ICO to have many participants in their bounty campaigns because that is really the reason or purpose why they started it -- to get lots of support from people who would spread the word about their project. Think about it, if only a few people join their campaign, then it will also be unfair to them, especially if they are giving rewards based on stakes. What if only three people participated, for example, in their signature, and they allocated 20% or 5 million of their tokens to that campaign? Then that means only those three people will get all the total tokens allocated to it even if they didn't attract any investors to the project. That, I think, would not be fair to the ICO.

AmazingDynamo

full member

Activity: 248

Merit: 100

Quote from: Jonnitor on March 18, 2018, 08:41:55 PM

Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.

the good effect is on the side of the one who creates the project because the ads will be spread in broad way but the participants obviously they will earn lesser than with the lesser number of the participants so people choosing a less participants even has no good stakes .

mrdelacrua

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I'm afraid that the company's bounty will disappear with time. I noticed that the most successful projects go to the stage of private ICO and as a rule do not have a bounty, but only anouncement topic on the bitcointalk forum...

Jonnitor

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 11

Participating in a bounty with too many participants means that you should expect less rewards because many of you are going to share the bounty pool allocated in a particular campaign. This also means that the project is good that's why many participated.

fileo

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 10

Rangers Protocol

According to my observation if one campaign limit the number of bounty hunters that able to participate the loses is not for the bounty hunters but for them. Bounty hunters play some major roles to promote the project effectively. Through them the campaign can end success or it could not.

MarkusIsaiah

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Bounty campaign is popular in this crytocurrency because i think it is the best way to earn with no capital. but right now it is hard to. join bounty campaign first because of the ranking system, then some of the campaign are picking the best participant to their campaign.

konco_kenthel

full member

Activity: 378

Merit: 100

Yes with the campaign participants who often soar automatically can reduce the results obtained later so we should be able to join as soon as possible if we want to continue to gain an advantage.

aussiesloth

member

Activity: 266

Merit: 41

While bounty hunters may want participant numbers capped for each campaign segment (and some are), many ICOs are happy to get the widest possible exposure, hence, allowing unlimited participants. There have been campaigns where I've decided there isn't enough 'meat left on the bone' to continue the campaign, so I've simply walked away from it.

Personal choice for everyone - how little are you prepared to receive for your efforts. For bounty campaigners from poorer areas of the world, I think any return is better than nothing, so they will continue to participate, regardless of participant numbers.

CrazyJoker

full member

Activity: 689

Merit: 102

Yes, too much people now are tended to be involved in any ICO. And sure, other participants have less opportunities to earn good rewards.
I think the best decision is limited number of participants. If some participants begin to ignore rules and do nothing, they should be banned and their positions will be free for new participants.

Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 130. (Read 10495 times)