Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 131. (Read 10495 times)
I think that not everything is as bad as you described. You see only one side of the medal, and there is another. More people, and therefore more large-scale advertising companies and popularization, and hence more investors will be involved and as a result, the company collects the maximum amount and rewards you with rewards, you will in any case get what you deserve.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Last time managers more and more regulate rules and check with attention job of bounty participants. Another problem is created scam ICOs and in final all participants didn't get rewards What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
In my opinion we have alot of investors and we should have many participants on bounty campaigns. Remember we are on early stage we could dominate the market and alot of countries will adopt the blockchain and will create a startup business with their ICO it will broadcast on social media.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes you are right. But my analise said that Managers check more and more about doing campaigns and delite a lot of participants in spreadsheet and regulate revards.What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
By the way, your account has no a lot of posts too
You need to work out the maths before jumping on the Bounty train. I mostly do signatures when I do partake in Bounty. I usually try to go for Projects that I find have good metrics but if it is to much participants in the signature I keep looking.
Now the only thing I notice in the constraints. This is just a limited number of participants. Who made that good man. That's not right
Let's say that when the participants of a campaign are bigger, we can not get all of our rewards. If the campaign is for longtime, then the reward we receive will be less, because while the campaign takes longer the participants are increasing.
Or maybe even so many participants are joining a campaign because they know the project is good.
Or maybe even so many participants are joining a campaign because they know the project is good.
Is not the current spending rules more stringent? especially with the new rules regarding the feasibility of this forum, I think more and more participants who follow the bounty then the better the development of the project because my opinion of investors from the ICO project also from one bounty participant.
Somewhat confusing if the manager makes the rules of giving and requirements more difficult then very rarely will follow the bounty then the thread will also sink because there is no more discussion about the project.
Somewhat confusing if the manager makes the rules of giving and requirements more difficult then very rarely will follow the bounty then the thread will also sink because there is no more discussion about the project.
I hope some people stop to participate in bounty and stay only the best one and the hard working. We have some periods of time, when opinion about crypto world changing, so who knows... if BTC gonna cost $3000 maybe some community go away and stay aware of this fucking crypto money
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
If the bounty campaign has many participants so it means that they have a good ICO that will be ending soon and bounty campaign participants will be having a very good bounty stake tokens in the end of the ICO sale.
It's very hard to find the best ICO or the best bounty campaigns today because there are only few people who could perfectly sense the good one over the other.
I think someone has the right and deserves the opportunity to participate in the gift even if they are a newbie. It is time for them to learn more when they know there is a possibility that they will become investors in ICO. And that is good for the presence of alt coins.
In fact, if you are a newbie and you do not have a high-ranking account, then the chances that you will be able to earn a large amount of money are very small.
Do you heard about Twitter will ban crypto ads? Do you think they will also block retweets and tweets about crypto? This will be so bad, so bad news right now in crypto, hope we will recover from this s..t.
And then, friends, it will only be more difficult and more difficult. Already every schoolboy has learned to participate in the bounty, make reposts, some of his posts and receive easy money, articles, translations and signature are still more relevant.
You are kind of right to certain extent. But this is bound to happen. Cryptocurrency is becoming popular day by day. Very soon, bounties won't be of much value I guess. I think bounties should have limited number of participants so that who ever is participating gets good reward. But having more participants is actually good for them so I doubt, they are gonna do it. They need more publicity. They will still spend the same amount with limited number of participants so why to set limit?
you can even look at ENVION in bounty thread. There are thousands of participants. ico is just a few weeks to go but the bounty people do not have tokens yet. and it will take a few more weeks because there are too many participants. and then everyone gets little token because each of the thousands gets a share. they will wonder and annoy
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think it is necessary to regulate the participation of those who joined the bounty of the company later. And still need to actively deal with multi-accounts and bots.What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
It's difficult to check or monitor the multiple accounts that are joining into the same bounty campaign so the reason why there are too many bounty campaign participants it's because the ICO are getting fame and it's popular and there's a strong possibility that it will soon the next big Altcoin in the market in the next few months.
CEDEX is one of the most popular bounty campaigns that has a lot of participants so it was already on it's 4th going to 5th month but there will be another 2 more months before it will end.
In my opinion I think all ICo's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICo its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
If the bounty campaign has many participants so it means that they have a good ICO that will be ending soon and bounty campaign participants will be having a very good bounty stake tokens in the end of the ICO sale.
It's very hard to find the best ICO or the best bounty campaigns today because there are only few people who could perfectly sense the good one over the other.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think it is necessary to regulate the participation of those who joined the bounty of the company later. And still need to actively deal with multi-accounts and bots.
I think it's wild! For 3-4 thousand participants! Where are they so connected 
Nothing can be earned with so many participants !!
I really hope that either the people themselves will leave, because there is not enough patience and will not earn enough, or there will be some restrictions ...
Nothing can be earned with so many participants !!I really hope that either the people themselves will leave, because there is not enough patience and will not earn enough, or there will be some restrictions ...
You are kind of right to certain extent. But this is bound to happen. Cryptocurrency is becoming popular day by day. Very soon, bounties won't be of much value I guess. I think bounties should have limited number of participants so that who ever is participating gets good reward. But having more participants is actually good for them so I doubt, they are gonna do it. They need more publicity. They will still spend the same amount with limited number of participants so why to set limit?
Jump to: