Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 136. (Read 10495 times)
Yes that's true bounty campaigns is getting better and becoming famous right now because of the higher percentage that you can get and its varies in how many participants joining. If the supply of the bounty is bigger the more the participants are joining it means the more the better and the stakes will be divided if how many participants are in there.
There are some ICOs that limit their participants but most ICOs don't have a limit that's why Bounty campaigns have certainly become the most sought opportunity in this system to earn some extra bucks. Many participants are synonymous with popularity. Its products and utilities are promoted to consumers or investors effectively. This is very important for the success of tokens and coin afterwards.
Well, as you can see in bounty campaigns there are rules to be followed and if you are not qualified you cannot joined., so how can you say that they need to choose the best participants, in bounty campaigns the more participants joined, the more it would be successful because they helped the project to be well knowned.
I do not think it's necessary, because there's a merit system, with a merit system, automatically new members who want to join in bitcointalk have to work hard to raise their rank by making quality posts, of course this is at the same time sorting out the best participants in a bounty campaign
I think the number of participants in the bounty campaigns will be more and more numerous, because they are becoming increasingly popular. From my egoistic perspective as a bounty hunter, I would like to limit the number of participants, especially in those campaigns where the pool is small. But I think that would not be fair. Don't forget that what we do is a marketing and promotion campaign for a company who pays us for it, and that the company will be interested the more advertising, the better. So I don't think they're very interested in limiting the number of participants.
Yes, agree with your statement in fact i noticed now a days that more bounty campaigns are executing limits for the participants joining social media and signature campaigns and this is case to case basis because some campaign have successfully done earlier because of ads. makes investors wanted to invest more over a nice campaign.
There are many bounty hunter now because it promises to earn extra income for them who involved in. However, we should receive the amount of salary from the bounty. We know that it is based on the number of participant in the bounty. The more participant involved in the less tokens or salary they receive. Now there are new comers who are interested in bounty campaign due to the simple works of it, like and share only.
There are projects that specify the tokens you will receive. Then increasing the number of participants will not affect your bonus. If it's a stake, it probably decreases when converted to a token. But the number of new entrants earns not really much. It's mostly in signatures and blogs, videos. And the new man can not do that.
There are many bounty hunter now because it promises to earn extra income for them who involved in. However, we should receive the amount of salary from the bounty. We know that it is based on the number of participant in the bounty. The more participant involved in the less tokens or salary they receive. Now there are new comers who are interested in bounty campaign due to the simple works of it, like and share only.
I have no problem with it. Sustenance already set up, a lot or a little let's be grateful. If you do not make this the main income, then I think not to worry. Those who join the bounty campaign also need money, so share them as long as it does not violate the rules of course. 
Actually there are various bounty programs have limits to their participants. High standards are given to applicants who wish to participate in different campaign. So it's not easy for new ones to get involved. But now more members prefer to join in different campaign to earn profit, rather than investing or trade different currency. I think this will not be a problem , because there are so many bounties out there. You just have to look those bounty that have a good ICOs to their members.
I think the number of participants in the bounty campaigns will be more and more numerous, because they are becoming increasingly popular. From my egoistic perspective as a bounty hunter, I would like to limit the number of participants, especially in those campaigns where the pool is small. But I think that would not be fair. Don't forget that what we do is a marketing and promotion campaign for a company who pays us for it, and that the company will be interested the more advertising, the better. So I don't think they're very interested in limiting the number of participants.
It depends. There're campaigns that are full of participants but not others, you just have to try to find the most profitable ones for each one. The bounties are becoming more popular every day. I believe that the number will continue to increase.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
your reacting because the amount of rewards is lessen?your a sucking greedy human,dont you know that while many are participating in bounty means big chance of the project to succeed?and when the project succeed then the participants and investors will gain same as the dev?and why not be happy because many people will benefits instead of fewer? What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
You dont have to worry to much about too many participants in bounty. Merit is doing its job on BTT, so soon you want see new people getting a new rank higher than j.member
In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.
i think that if they do limit the participants the budget for the particular campaign will be lessen , on the side of the team the more the participants the more it favor to them and i think there is no bad things if the participants is too many .
if in my opinion bounty stout participants it's a project that's pretty good but not every bounty participant in the limit and also kalo bayak peseta kanrame and also later pay it a little karna di degan the pesetanya a lot of it but if what can we list if we should check first if the participants are too much better looking for another bounty is better.
In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.
Yes, there are a few more, the speed of the crypt will become even more popular 
then the bounty will become even more 
then the bounty will become even more 
Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us
I agree with you, there is no problem to joining more BKoubty becuase they want a big profit, and they work hard to achieve. 
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There so many nee that joining bounty because some of them they dont pay exactly that is why they joining facebook and twitter to earn more profit. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There are way too many shitty bounties and way too many scammers at the moment! People impersonating other people, with a different ETH address and so on.
We need a better system and we need it quick!
We need a better system and we need it quick!
Jump to: