Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 148. (Read 10495 times)

I think anyone has a right to join the bounty program organized by ICO, the success of bounty is if the program submitted by ICO can be accepted by the society, receiving many participants is the desire of every bounty so that every promo or information given can be reported in the whole community. if the profit value of bounty participants I think that's part of the risk of the participants.

On the other hand it isn't favorable to projects to limit the number of participants of a bounty. The more advertising, the better for the project.

there are some limited campaigns and true more and more participants,because bounty campaigns are getting popular just enough to share and get a reward. and there may be new regulations for social media, just look at the participant's signature campaign not many participants because it is difficult to do.

I am actually hoping this crash makes doing bounties not worth it for more people. There are so many bounty hunters now and they are earning real money. Some have made it a full time job to do bounties.

What is going to happen though is enough ICOs are going to get sued and the government is going to get involved when bounties aren't paid out correctly. Then the government will start looking at bounties like a source of income and start chasing people for income tax on it. The result will be the government digging itself even deeper into the crypto world and turning what could be the most democratic force ever created into a centralized, controlled government system.

At present, a lot of people are participating in bounty campaign.
We are joining to earn free more coins. I get paid for what I have worked for.That's why rewards have been decreasing.  It will be regulated by limiting the number of participants for bounty campaign.

actually bounty campaigns do have restrictions, especially in bitcoin campaigns, it is more strict than altcoin bounty campaign which is the participants are limited and there are some requirements to do to receive your reward
you cant stop the people to join from bounty campaign since it is their right to apply and participate on every bounty programs, if you dont want it, then dont join.

That is usually the case with all the things that offer relatively huge profits for little time invested. In the beginning, when the thing is still "underground" it is logical that rewards will be high, because there are not a lot of people participating. Then, when the word gets out, the ratio begins to drop, because more and more people are joining. It's how this world works, sadly. And it can't be any different. Especially not with doing bounties since ICO companies have the fixed amount of money intended for a bounty.

Restraining the number of participating bounty hunters? Hmm, I don't know. On one side, that would make rewards higher or at least the same, but on the other, it would be a butchery here on the forum, since it would work on "first come, first serve" principle.

But don't worry. Not a lot of people are aware of this forum and bounties. It will take a lot of time for bounty rewards to become smaller. I suppose I give it 1-2 years. And that is a lot of time in crypto world where things are moving very quickly. My suggestion for you is to do as much bounties as you can and surely you will get satisfactory results.

I prefer campaign that are hard to complete (for example Amazix ones that required max 1 retweet x hour), so in this case if you want to have max reward you have to do hard work..

Bounty campaigns is getting better and becoming famous right now because of the higher percentage that you can get and its varies in how many participants joining. If the supply of the bounty is bigger the more the participants are joining it means the more the better and the stakes will be divided if how many participants are in there. 

In present time the merit system was deployed on the BitcoinTalk forum, so the signature campaigns won't be overfilled by high rank users anyway. Yes, many people join the social network campaigns, but some bounty managers limit the maximal count of participants of Facebook or Twitter campaigns. Now the new field for bounty hunters is created - Telegram, but its channels also might be overfilled too fast.

the number of bounty participants will of course continue to grow, aren't we also involved the socialization of ico ? it's becomes a natural thing if there is a growing number of participants. if you make limit for the number the player bounty, manager can improve bounty system for example by limiting the participation of bounty on ip address participants.

I think the ICO bounty is becoming more and more popular nowadays as there are many ICO projects launching daily. To make a significant profit, you need to be able to analyze for the potential ICO project. It's normal for many bounty hunters to find it because the average daily bounty signature I have is about 300-400 participants, and there are very few bounty limits the participant because the more participants, the more they will benefit, the campaign will be promoted more widely.

Too many participants in bounty campaigns because i think this is the easiest way to gain profit in crypto and you don't need to invest money in bounty.

I don't see anything wrong about having a bounty campaign with lots of participants. Just hunt bounty campaigns with fewer participants but a good ICO.

Yes it is very crowded and those lower ranking in signatures like me doesnt receive good bounties after working for months to promtoe these ICOs,so we really need some limit in the number of participants so that these bounties will still be profitable,less participants will give more rewards ICOs today are more compare to last year so there will always be new bounties.

Yes, I also feel that there is too much people for now. But the bad news are coming, some kind of the creepy terrorists stuff in case of cryprto - lol, but that will cool down the market and probably some people will go away. But in the future I also see that there might be some kind of bounty pools with qualified and well-expirienced crypto-promoters 

I really think the same ,bounties are far less compare to the early years which you can enjoy rewards today most of the people are joinin bounty campaigns also those investors in ICOs they are starting to join bounties too,that is why our campaigns are crowded as ever giving tier would be okay so the bounties will be equally distributed by ranks ,

Yes it is very crowded,i a can feel that thes bounties are too small compare to the previous years and months that there are  less participants ,limiting the participants would be a very good idea if you ask me,because the bounties will be equaly distributed with the particiapants or we can have tier rewards like what the bountyhive has.

Campaign managers and the project team would not mind this issue, and oppose against regulating the number of participants. Though it may be more difficult to manage more and more participants, that is what the project team wants and needs, to be advertised more. It would be better for them if their campaign is flooded with participants, rather than regulated like the other campaigns.

Haha, I think you just picked the one with the most hype. I recently participated in a bounty program in which were involved about 1500 people only in the articles section!! Imagine what was in other sections.
And at the moment I am part of another one in which there is not a lot of people, at most 20 people writting articles and like 50 doing Twitter and Facebook bounty. So it depends on the campaign.

My advice?

If you look at the bounties in general, you will see that the highest percentage goes to the signature. The higher, the better. That is not a rule, though.
Also promoting through youtube and articles as well are very well rewarded.

Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba Group, says that "When you have $1 billion, that's not your money, that's trust society gives you".

So, let's aim high. How high you can aim?

Let's suppose Jack Ma would do bounties. Very good. To which section he would aim?

In my opinion, he would go for the ones that require more hard work at the begining to build a foundation (like a Legendary Rank) or reaching a reasonable high number of followers on youtube (like 10k). This means a lot of work and expertise at first. Expertise should become a habit. Learning daily should become a routine.

You want to do the action with the highest return of investment (ROI). That means building a name, a profile, being somebody known that people trust and follow. Just in this way you can really win big in bounties.

Sharing, posting, tweeting, retweeting, and reporting them all afterwards in my opinion takes a lot of time that is very, very, very important.

Try to do the most in the least amount of time.

The foundation is the key. Jack Ma would choose the foundation that is earn through authentic work over quick gain made by easy, time eating tasks.

What would you choose?

And one last thought. Is not what happens with the environment that affects you, is the way you see it and react at it. Do you wanna whinne or win?

Act accordingly