Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 152. (Read 10495 times)
Yes, the crypt becomes very popular and more people start participating in bounty campaigns, but I'm more worried about the fact there are even more scams.
If you are looking to earn some crypto I would look into Crowdholding. They are a co-creation platform where you earn crypto for giving feedback to tasks. It is free to sign up to and you can get multiple tokens. It's a more organised way to earn crypto than picking random bounty campaigns. Link is below.
https://www.crowdholding.com
https://www.crowdholding.com
Might be a good idea if there are some new rules about bounty campaigns or the bounty managers will do tha same allocations like in bounty hive there are tiers which will give equality with the participants ,high ranking accounts would have limited gains because there are limited stakes that they can get,unlike from traditional stakes that only those high ranks will get most of the bounty stakes.
I agree that there are more and more new people. Bounty companies are crowded. Some managers limit the number of participants. For example, the first 500 people - in my opinion so far this is the only good solution. But soon this will not be enough and will have to come up with something to solve this problem.
The number of participants has increased, but the number of bounty has also increased significantly, so choose projects that are more interesting for you, participate and earn.
the number of participants has increased, but the number of bounty has also increased significantly, so choose projects that are more interesting for you, participate and earn.
Bounty managers should give stakes based on the quality of the posts,not from the ranks because that is stupidity most of these high ranks doesnt even know how to compose or deliver basic english sentences,i am not saying all of them but most people i know doesnt deserved the high ranking stakes especially from the signatures.
Now there is a lot of competition and you just have to be the best to make money on this. If you constantly develop, you can earn money here
I think new participants and popularity of cryptocurrency means new money which will be invested in cryptocurrency, more new ICO, tokens and cryptocurrencies and more new bounty project! All of this is interdependent!
Yes it happens too many times and the results are awful because the people whow got involved early are facing a very low profit for their efforts. The participant number has been limited in the most successful ICOs.
I think it should be regulated because lately it's all enthusiasts wants to partake in and not the pre-sales or crowdsales.
No need to regulate im sure in the future there will be less people who will participate these ICO campaigns,because the merit system really did a good job to fight these shitposters,therae will be less high ranking accounts that will be able to join signature campaigns less high rank participants will give us good bounties in the future.
For now, as I can see bounty campaign is going to control the number of participant, new bounty campaign often accept limited number of participant for all their bounty part. But there are only few campaigns is doing like that. Facebook and Twitter bounty are the easiest bounty that why there are a lot of people prefre joining these bounty to signature or translation bounty.
Good thing the merit system has lessen the shitposters in this forum,less account farmers will be able to get high ranks in this forum so that there will be less people to participate bounty campaigns especially the signature campaigns,less participants will give us more profits because there will be less competitors from this forum.
This is certainly a big problem. Managers of bounty programs must set limits on the number of participating in social campaigns twitter and facebook. For a good project, the most important thing is more advertising. Therefore all and join a lucrative bounty campaign.
many participants mean many people who promote tooso, it will be many investors coming in.
IMO limiting participant isn't effective, better to tighten the rules
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I agree with more strict rules and regulations and limiting the number of participants to a certain campaign. If we think I'm ICO team point of view it is actually a good news for them because their campaign will get more exposure. More exposure is equal to more audience it will reach. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
The merit system really heps this forum from shitposters,that is why i love what theymos did,less people will be able to participate these signature campaigns shitposters wont have any choice but to participate the social media campaigns there they can posts spam.I also love less participants in the bounty campaigns because the less partcipants the higher the rewards.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Some of the campaigns has already getting more strict,before they accept some participants might have a good quality posts in their profiles,and those low quality posters wont get accepted,i love these campaigns because these shitsposters wont have any chance to get stakes because the managers are greading quality posts to be accepted. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I think here very soon it will be very difficult to earn. Many people come and profits fall. The only thing that can help is the restriction on the number of participants already
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
That is why the forum is making changes to lessen the potential of other people on making several accounts and joining campaigns with multiple accounts. Some managers are making strict rules to lessen participants and picking their participants carefully because some people are just up for the money and not on the quality of their jobs.
Jump to: