Bounty and too many participants - page 151.

Idrisu

sr. member

Activity: 924

Merit: 260

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

What you are saying is that more people are coming to knowllege that they can actually participate in the ico and make money and some prefer to do this instead of investing into the ico itself? I think the project manager prefer to get more people for their bounty program than just get few that cannot really take the projects to potential investors.

andiko

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 101

Asura – Self Sustainable eSport ecosystem

I think that managers need to gradually limit the number of participants and introduce KYC. This will help more or less avoid multiple accounts

cryptobobo

member

Activity: 210

Merit: 10

The P2P Marketplace For Digital Content

Bounty managers will find a better way to have more reliable bounty rewards,might be agood idea if they copy the bountyhive's system which will limit particpants from getting most of the stakes,because today higher ranks will always have advantages especially in the signature campaigns and those low rank profiles wont have much stakes.

maereglapo

member

Activity: 181

Merit: 10

Merit system really helps the bounty hunters,especially when these shit posters are doing spam posts to get faster rank ups here,their main aim is to participate signature campaigns,the merit system really fucked up these people because they wont rank up without the required merit that is why in the future the participants from the signatures will be less,because the demands are higher more projects are coming in.

high demands means higher rewards.

CryptRoller

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 15

Mining. Hosting. Cloud Mining.

I like the way Bountyhive manages the participants. Their way makes it more transparent whih part of the bounty is shared for each tier.

Spaffin

full member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 108

Quote from: Samk on March 14, 2018, 11:27:36 AM

ya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.

In fact, the new signers of the campaign have already been cut off by the introduced rules about the need to have a certain amount of merit before proceeding to the next rank for the opportunity to get more tokens in the signature campaign. Virtually without merit, you can achieve a junior member. To get the rank of the participant you need to have ten merits already, and this is a big problem since no good reports you write, it is unlikely that someone will send you the merits. And to the rank of a full participant in general it is not really possible to reach even in a few years. Therefore, in the near future it is unlikely that the company's signature plots will become much larger than now. Who by this time managed to get the highest ranks, he now wins considerably.

Olega252

full member

Activity: 560

Merit: 100

Yes it is right, people at a forum became in tens times more, in comparison with previous year, have to toughen rules of participation who just will do these to generosity, and about them forgotten, or to make careful, tough selection on these generosity

cryptomorphines

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 10

The bounty managers will limit the participants of course in the future if the participants are too much,especially those high ranking accounts these accounts are getting most of the stakes with less efforts and those low ranks like us wont get any good bounties,the managers should have some tiers like what bountyhive has so that there will be equality in the bounties.

annmhie0904

newbie

Activity: 196

Merit: 0

yes, agree. there are too many participants for bounties. maybe they should think regarding the qualifications in the bounties. like first 200 members only. 200 participants is way too many to spread the words of the project. That was my opinion.

KTChampions

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1951

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You always want to earn more, but when there is a person who agrees to do a job cheaper you can not do anything about it. It is a free economy and everyone decides for what price to work for him. If you do not like earnings, then you can stop doing this activity.

dzhan

sr. member

Activity: 743

Merit: 250

Usually the bounty managers have their restrictions and rules , including the limits of participants, the quality of posting in the forum, and the quality social media accounts of their participants and so on. They aren't accepting everyone applying to join, unless if the project have low value and want cheap and low quality advertising.

matsusomoto

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Signatures are the only way we could get decent amount of bounties,social media campaigns are crowded with these cheaters, a lot of multi accounts are getting rewards,we cannot do something about these but the campaign managers can fight these cheaters and in thinking about KYC thing from every accounts here but theymos wont agree with these surely.

Fatunad

sr. member

Activity: 2226

Merit: 347

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

You cant stop such thing because bounty programs doesnt really have strict requirement for you to join which means you can easily join up without any problems as long you can able to do the task then it would be already okay and expect bounties will really comes lesser and lesser as the participant numbers do soar up.You cant stop it but now when those ICO are changing rules which do some of them require KYC it start out to make changes in numbers.

HashieNewb

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: paxmao on March 14, 2018, 02:07:29 PM

Yes it happens too many times and the results are awful because the people whow got involved early are facing a very low profit for their efforts. The participant number has been limited in the most successful ICOs.

It may not be a bad thing for bounties because a whole lot of promotion is needed for the ICO. If there is a lot of people in the campaign then the project is likely to do well.

jakiro.hovard

full member

Activity: 504

Merit: 100

I think that this behavior of people is due precisely to the fact that now there are a lot of people on the forum who have received ranks. Probably, therefore, they introduced merit in order to simply reduce the number of people who are now here. I think this is a great feature on this forum.

pstraene

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 11

When I read this, I always have to think about envion. the bountx people have been waiting for their tokens for many weeks. There were also thousands of participants and the counting takes far too long

sorehammer

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Quote from: whatthesith on March 14, 2018, 11:12:26 AM

Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Totally agree with you because there should be strict rules and bounty managers should pick full members rank.With increasing participants reward also gets reduce.Bounty managers should pick out those participants who have track record of constructive/Logical comments,so that it may contribute a lot towards the success of that bounty campaigns.

Jose.Tormo

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Restricting the number of bounty participants is a decision best left to the funding project teams, not to this forum or any outside "regulator." Every project is different - if a project team wants a huge bounty population, they will create an easy airdrop campaign. If they want a small, tough bounty, they will offer just a handful of people tokens for doing some extraordinary work (translation, moderation, software debugging, publicity, whatever). Why even think about setting rules to govern these kind of programs?

HoaNguyen

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

The All-in-One Cryptocurrency Exchange

I think all upcoming bounty campaign should limit the number of participant in their campaign like only 100 pariticipants for each part of bounty campaign or they can require Full Member rank and above can be able to join their bounty campaign, I think it'll help decreasing a great number of participants in each bounty campaign. For now, almost bounty campaign often have thousands participants, it's really great so it take too much time for bounty manager and their team to manage every participant and calculate the spreadsheet at the end of bounty campaign.

Emilyearl

full member

Activity: 700

Merit: 105

APESWAP

Some regulations like rank or merit system will make it more profitable to hunters as it used to be before now. But the aim of bounty campaign is to spread the project to all and the more people join the campaigns, the more exposed the project becomes and the more investors are attracted.

Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 151. (Read 10495 times)