Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 60. (Read 10495 times)
I don't think that the number of participants will be hard to earn much, when in doubt, a large portion of the Twitter and Facebook members don't have an enormous number of endorsers, and in the organization of marks there are excessively numerous youngsters as a rule, so members with great rank have nothing to stress over for install
Yes, now bounties have become very popular. And many people participate in them. And the payments are small. I think the best option is to limit the number of participants.
limiting participants are tantamount to limiting the popularity of projects being promoted. more auto project participants are getting more familiar with and understood by all people, and more and more investors will know and want to join in popular projects. so not the best solution the manager restricts the bounty campaign participants. I try to participate in a good bounty, where there are not so many participants. To then get a good profit.
if too many gift participants will affect the acceptance of the gift.we must follow the bounty that still few participants who follow, and will receive a greater gift.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
for a bounty project the more participating might be better, as with it the more that promotes their project. but if calculated from the distribution of prizes then it will be smaller for the participants What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Honestly, I think peoples has right and deserved a chance to participate in bounty even they are newbie. It is the time for them to learn more about alt coins, when they know then there are a probability that they will become an investors in ICO. And it is good for the alt coins existence .
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I see three ways out of the current situation with bounty campaigns:
1. Introduce the KYC identification that will cut off the people participating in the campaigns by multi-accounts.
2. Increase the requirements for members' accounts or increase the rewards of those who have accounts with a large number of subscribers / longer account times.
3. Complicate tasks in bounty campaigns so that they need to be done longer and better, which also cuts off people who can not do anything.
I try to participate in a good bounty, where there are not so many participants. To then get a good profit.
It would be nice if in all the bounty there was a limit on the number of participants. Then the payments would be more. Now there are too many participants.
Now though there are a lot of participants in the bounty, but all the same it is worth participating in them. This is a good extra earnings.
I think if bounty a lot of participants so the project is good and the payouts will be significant, as many people scam not Klute mostly.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I guess Social Media Bounties should have limits. its kinda frustrating actually. specially of your working hard for a couple of months of social media bounties, and at the end of the bounty. your gonna earn so little. its like your effort, wasnt worth it. i guess my opinion would be,What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Limited Slot for Social Media Bounties.
The Quality of Self Tweet/FB Post should be considered regardless of the followers/friends (but at least at the minimum number though should be meet)
if any bounty has too many participant you have one way. Ne need effort a little bit benefit and you can get out there 
Oh yes, too many people in bounty is very bad, I know that the best campaigns do limit the number of hunters and that makes them much more attractive. If the campaign is too long is not worth either.
Yes, now bounties have become very popular. And many people participate in them. And the payments are small. I think the best option is to limit the number of participants.
My opinion is that a growing number of participants that join like on facebook, twitter and content creation. I think it is very good and with their promotion of this crypto world certainly will be more widely known. Perhaps from project ICO adds some rules that could add to the participant who is the participants that have quality.
Most of these participants are bots or people who created a special page in social networks for bounty campaigns. I do not think that they give any significant conversion. Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
We still can earn though there are many participants who join bounty campaign because the allocations are talking about million of dollars and even if how many participant will share that bounty still it is good as a sideline or another source of income. But if you are focusing too much on the system and earn then definitely it will not be enough to sustain the cost of living. The good thing about the huge number of participants joining in bounty campaign is that it will make the ICO project to be more successful since there are many who are doing the campaign. This will make the ICO developer happier than before since the bounty reward is still the same and they could not increase it since it is already computed and allocated in their ICO project What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I do not think that payments on the bounty will change much, as a rule, most of the Twitter and Facebook participants do not have a huge number of subscribers, and in the company of signatures there are too many juniors in general, so that participants with good rank have nothing to worry about for payments
Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
The growth of the community of the bounty participants is a normal situition, one of the reason is the participants of bounty in twitter campaign and facebook campaign is influencing the other social media users to participate. And also there is no need to be worried regarding the profit because the number of ICO is also growing which is balancing the growth of the participants. Also there are alot of campaign in just one project. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Yes, there are more and more participants, but it seems to me that many of these participants are becoming investors. I'm no exception either. I participated in one project, I really liked him and his team, I believed them and invested a little.
Jump to: