Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 63. (Read 10495 times)
There is limit on number of participants allowed . You just have to apply before others to get accepted and this requires you to be very active on this forum. With time, you will also find out the mangers with most new campaigns.
How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community. That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit.
I think its hard to choose the best bounty hunter you can't tell if the one who participates is the best one by signing up. much better if they pot a limitation of participant.
I think that by the bounty of the managers of companies must make the verification system of the participants. The participant must provide a portfolio of their work, how faithfully he participated in other companies. But managers should also be more attentive and strict to the selection of companies, not to take different substandard ICO in service.
You are right but i will suggest you join the bounty which has limit the participates and also join signature,article bounty in which you will earn more stack than Twitter or Facebook.
signature campaign is the most profitable but you can take part only in one during certain period while you can join several social media campaigns at the same time.
I think that in order to have an advantage over other participants, it is necessary to improve the quality of their work, for example, to write good, author's articles, reviews, create content, etc.
Those who participate in bounty projects are in fact much more problems - for example, projects that use bounty hunter labor and then refuse to pay the rewards they are entitled to. I think that this is a much bigger problem than a large number of participants.
You are right but i will suggest you join the bounty which has limit the participates and also join signature,article bounty in which you will earn more stack than Twitter or Facebook.
To many participants, makes payout to be very low. But the thing about bounties is joining a campaign that will pay you for your time and effort at the end of the day. Not jut joining cos it has few participants.
this is because the task to do is very easy. especially for social media and telegram present. and the payment is still very legit. this is indeed a dilemma. but some managers and platforms began to limit. but the most I do not like is, many participants who follow more than 1 account.
As a matter of fact, there are abundance battles which restricts their members. In spite of the fact that it isn't that huge of an arrangement truly. Financial specialists would have a tendency to contribute and, can, in the meantime join abundance. They know too well that on the off chance that they do trust the undertaking then it is smarter to toss your cash than getting some free little cash being apportioned in various crusades to a great deal of members. Likewise, members would tend to discover another battle in the event that they think there are excessively numerous members as of now so as such it tends to restrict themselves instead of actualizing a remark them.
In recent months, there are a lot of Twitter and telegraph users in the bounty activities, which will certainly reduce the token distribution of the bounty participants. We all know that FB has banned ICO's business a long time ago, which has to be said to be related to the unlimited social media in the bounty activities, and I recommend reducing the shangj of social media promotion.
Inasmuch as participants are increasing for bounties so also there is a proportional increase in the number of bounties being churned out, I do not see it as a problem because if it's only fewer persons participating the much-needed publicity might not be achieved. These bounties are somehow cumbersome also, just take for example bounties that require 4 tweets a day, several Facebook posts, comments on bitcointalk. How many can someone partake in? Space is much to accommodate many, some will get tired most especially if the rewards are not redeemed on time, then they back out.
Some bounties give a specific number of participants they want to have in their campaigns, others dont. And i think those who give a specific number to people are often taken more serious from my point of view. But if we are to limit the number of people in each campaign, the advertisement might not go very far.More over, some people will always be left behind and wont get enough campaigns to join.
5 months ago there were only just 500+ participants to social media bounty of a good project. but now there are more than 3000+ members i can see in spreadsheets. anyway its good thing that crypto is spreading faster than ever. also we are getting less rewards. but i think even $50 from one social media bounty campaign also enough .for signature bounty i think 30% of total bounty allocation is enough. but still there are lot of project. join 10 projects once and do them. still you will earn $1000+
Yes, now it is not so easy to choose companies that will bring more profit. But this can and should be done. In any case, competition is growing. But we don't know what will happen when there are really many participants in each campaign. Perhaps managers will do something, perhaps something else..
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I am learning. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
There are such bounty campaigns, where less than 100 people participate in social campaigns, you are simply looking bad. There you can earn good money.
I guess, As at now 50 per cent of people in the world are into cryptocurrency, then tell me how there will not be too much of people participating in each bounty and the counting is increasing day by day which brings about less amount received from each bounty.
If you think there are too many participants in bounty campaign, most especially for those who are yet to come into it. They are missing a lot of opportunities.
Jump to: