Today too many people engage in Bounty, and the fraudulent ico rifle is rampant in the Crypto market. We will be more difficult to participate in the Bounty campaign and the amount of tokens we receive will be less than in the past.
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 64. (Read 10495 times)
the increase in the number of participants in the bounty is a pattern that follows from the dissemination of information about the cryptocurrency.the growth is not so great.Generosity is also a job where you have to be diligent and not lazy.Most do not want to strain and work. so don't worry participate in generosity.I wish you all successful projects
Well, its natural for something like this to happen, eventually people who can think out of the box will be able to earn better
I came to bounty last fall, then it was easy to make $ 300-500 for a Twitter and Facebook campaign. Now such earnings are the dream. But I managed to earn some money, so I'm not very upset. Now i write articles, participate in signature campaigns and trade on the exchanges. In light mode!
Bounty participant s are getting much, especially for the social media. I think the managers need a way to balancing some things so that things can go well and the rewards could be shared evenly.
My opinion is that in bounty campaigns it is necessary to enter the mandatory KYC identification because more and more participants lead to the participation of multi-accounts. This would increase the rewards for bona fide participants.
indeed the participant's bounty social media (FB & Twitter) is too much so that the fee for bounty spelled out very small when compared with signatures, blogs and more.
I think for bounty social media should be limited participants, so the participants are not too much and the results are not bad either.
maybe bounty managers may consider this suggestion
I think for bounty social media should be limited participants, so the participants are not too much and the results are not bad either.
maybe bounty managers may consider this suggestion
That is how it should be ENU. As many people as possible should be able to get hold of whatever they put in the work for. Investors will invest, hunters will hunt. There should be incentive for every act here. Distribution is good. Embrace it. Thats how things will look with time when the mass adoption comes.
I think that despite the large number of participants in the company's bounty can still bring you good profits. But in the future it will be a problem. After six months or a year, the number of participants will need to be limited, because when people start to pay $ 20 per signarute, all people will begin to resent and refuse to participate in the bounty companies.
it is true that today there are many bounty participants in a project. even reaching thousands of people who join. but there are some managers who apply the limited rules of bounty participants in the projects they manage, this can reduce the participants who want to follow the bounty program
I think that once all were not the best, and all developed gradually. Yes, the rewards are reduced with a large number of participants, it means that you have to work harder to get a good reward. I do not think that it is necessary to toughen the terms of participation in the company, it is necessary to give new members of our community to develop
The issue of too many participants in a bounty is also down to the managers, a lot of popular projects cap their bounty participants and after a while stop accepting new members. I believe this is good to ensure people spread better over the many projects available.
Of course, with the registration of new users, competition is increasing. About the fact that you need to do something, have already done, now you can not get a high rank. maximum probably - member
Of course, the rules of the game will change over time. Regulation of the number of participants and their composition will be introduced. This is already present in companies. Yes, and the introduction of merit is a confirmation. But so far with the growth in the number of participants, the number of Bounty companies has also increased significantly, so there will be enough work for everyone. It remains only to make the right choice.
Many bounty participants are exactly what the bounty program hopes to be. There are still many projects and they don't even have participants. People are unwilling to participate in its projects.
ya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.
I do not think it is necessary. There are many unemployed and they need a job that can help them to survive. You should not be so selfish. The more people involved, the more the project will be advertisedya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.
I do not think it is necessary. There are many unemployed and they need a job that can help them to survive. You should not be so selfish. The more people involved, the more the project will be advertised
Yeah bounty campaigns getting more and more popular that's why rewards are getting more less cause of too many participants.
last time its big problem, some campaigns pays 2-10$ for few month participation! I hope that admins will do something with it
Perhaps you are right that you need to tighten the bounty conditions. But most of all I'm bothered by bots. This process is quite easy to automate and it gives rise to the temptation to use bots. Especially if you look at the bounty for a telegram from some managers, there you can see up to 25k participants.
Jump to: