Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 88. (Read 10495 times)
I think more and more participants join in a project ICO will be increasingly added to the project a success. Karna with many participants of the project will be easier in running the promotion.
It would be nice to have some kind of adequate selection of participants, and most importantly - to have a limited number of participants. It is not very pleasant to participate for such a long time and at the end get very little because the participants were massive...
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Recently, more and more participants. The bounty theme has become very popular, I think it's good for project developers, but it will reduce the incomes of hunters for awards. Perhaps all the bounties of the campaign will be conducted in automated services. It is also possible that there will be even more participants. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
It is not fun to participate for 5-10 weeks and ultimately earn very little,
as there are 4000 participants.
And it would be nice to have some sort of adequate selection.
Participants, and most importantly - have a limited number of participants.
as there are 4000 participants.
And it would be nice to have some sort of adequate selection.
Participants, and most importantly - have a limited number of participants.
I known someone create many bitcointalk account, many facebook or twitter account and cheating bounty campaign
They can make 50k$/month
It very quickly to rich
They can make 50k$/month
It very quickly to rich
As the popularity of bounty campaign it becomes attractive to people and the more people promoting new projects, the more chance of the new projects to succeed. Don't be selfish for rewards, just help some projects and gain also a reward. See the good side of having too many participants, because they are influencing the circle of their friends about the project and what cryptocurrency do in our life.
absolutely yes, bounty campaigns are popular than ICO, Many people choose to join bounty campaign because it is easier from them most of all the active in the social media like Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. They choose to join this because they think they will start easy.
very many people are interested in bounty, no wonder if that follow too much too. this makes its own apart in the bounty as more and more people are chasing the prize then the less is also our chance to get the prize.
the more people who follow the bounty of a project then I think the project is good, but of course the competitiveness is getting tighter too. suppose who can, then he who is lucky.
yes bounty is very famous. but what I see today, the requirement to follow this bounty is more tightened and exacerbated the difficulty.Maybe because many people who participate to seek profit.
With so many new people coming to the board, the bounty pools would surely get diluted. I agree on a set number of participants. Also, the merit system will keep people from getting into more bounties so they won't be as diluted.
yes bounty is very famous. but what I see today, the requirement to follow this bounty is more tightened and exacerbated the difficulty.Maybe because many people who participate to seek profit.
I think bounty company attract more new members, and it's not weird. The ability to get tokens for free for any kind of action is very tempting. But I think that it is worth limiting the bounty of the company by the number of participants. This will help to avoid dissatisfaction among the participants.
You really have a lot of partitions when it comes to payments.
thousands of participants will actually split.
Unless you join a signature campaign then the attention is calm
but when it comes to twitter then it will be another story.
thousands of participants will actually split.
Unless you join a signature campaign then the attention is calm
but when it comes to twitter then it will be another story.
Only a growing number of followers will invest in a project. For investors, this is a waste of valuable time to promote meetings.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Do not agree with your opinion. There are a lot of Bounty projects and there are a lot of Bounty players too. But everyone does not choose a certain Bounty so there are a lot of Bounty and everyone chooses a certain Bounty.What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
I personally believe we in fact in need of more bounty hunters. There are so many bounty campaigns now. Obviously, many of us would be lost out some money especially from big-name ICOs bounty. But the growing numbers of bounties require more participants.
The crypto and ICO market has become so big nowadays, we need more adoption. Just look at the current state of Bitcointalk. It will keep on growing. I believe the bounty pool will increase in response to the bounty hunters volume. This year we could see more airdrops. They realized their tokens will be actually only worth something if they hit the exchanges. Thus, building community will be an important element now. Bounty campaign in a way is also one type of airdrops.
The crypto and ICO market has become so big nowadays, we need more adoption. Just look at the current state of Bitcointalk. It will keep on growing. I believe the bounty pool will increase in response to the bounty hunters volume. This year we could see more airdrops. They realized their tokens will be actually only worth something if they hit the exchanges. Thus, building community will be an important element now. Bounty campaign in a way is also one type of airdrops.
i think the only regulations that should be made is to regulate the ICOs that are coming up,it has become so easy for them to launch scam ICOs.
Fully agree, I think that the current bounty thread should include ICO rating information, or there should be a bounty guarantee platform, on which a bounty is required to be reviewed by the platform, or a certain guarantee provided by the development to the platform. A percentage of fees or tokens can be charged to bounty participants.
i don't think that should pose any threat to existing bounty hunters, it just means the cryptocurrency is now gaining more ground in the real world and people are now knowing more about it, and i think that is a good thing
Yes, Bounty campaign are more and more popular, Many of the participant are very good at promoting their brand, That is very important in the success of the ico's campaign, And many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them Invest in that ico's. So we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.
i think the only regulations that should be made is to regulate the ICOs that are coming up,it has become so easy for them to launch scam ICOs.
Jump to: