Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 87. (Read 10495 times)
LuckyToken doesn't have a lot participants yet so don't waste your time!
Bounty campaigns are more and more popular, and the number bounty hunter in crypto grows with every day.
Therefore, some managers limit the number of participants in their companies.
I think this is the right decision and fully support it.
Therefore, some managers limit the number of participants in their companies.
I think this is the right decision and fully support it.
It is true that those legit participants earn the profits they don't deserve because of the new participants. But still we can't stop them if they also want to earn profits. I think if we add up another new rules and regulations, those legit participants will also suffer from it. I believe earning merits not easily is enough to limit everyone to rank up and earn a lot. So lucky those who have already a higher rank, but that only means that they are the real early participants here.
I think more and more participants join in a project ICO will be increasingly added to the project a success. Karna with many participants of the project will be easier in running the promotion.
Yes agree, because the idea of this bounty with more participants is to reach as many people as possible. It's an alternative route for bounty managers to scale the rewards based on the amount of participation, so if there's a lot of participants in one ICO, they give bonus stakes.
To regulate participants in a bounty campaings will seems a lot of work for managers, that is why rules and regulations with limits are mostly set. But the more a campaign has many participants without limits, and less funds raised, the lesser the rewards.It always seems, social media campaign is flooded with more participants yet the percentage allocated to it is very small. That is why , signature campaing is best way to get great reward from bounties.
i completly agree with you, but the issue is just to avoid social mediam compaigns because s you said there are many participents wich make it very less and less rewards! so i advice you by signature compaign and telegram compaign or translation compaign and if you have famoust youtube channel so media compaign (sometimes it said contnent creation compaign) is the best !
You are right mate. For example, I joined a bounty and when I looked to the sğreadsheet I saw that there were more than 3000 participants. What can you earn from this bounty even if you continue till the end ? There may be some regulations about participant limits. For example, 200 participants for twitter, 100 for signature etc.
I think if a project is a lot of participants then it signifies the number of people who believe in the project and more and more people who participate spread promotions so that more investors will know so as to have many opportunities in achieving a success
I think it's okay. More people participants, project will more and more popular. They can hit softcap and hardcap, only then will they pay us. Last year, when bounty not generality, they can also run ads in social network to attract investors. But until now, social network will ban ICO's ads because a lot of scam happened. They will need human resources to advertise, and who? Yes, us. So i think they will pay us the right amount to advertise their project it's simple at understand.
I'm sure that when the market will stabilize, bounties will become even more popular then now. And so they will become less profitable. I started participating in them just to get some first income to start investing and trading..
However bounties are going on new dimension of attracting talent and sharing knowledge on blockchain cryptocurrencies and ICOs too, its just a long way to go
However bounties are going on new dimension of attracting talent and sharing knowledge on blockchain cryptocurrencies and ICOs too, its just a long way to go
Now many companies are are carrying out bounty and more people participate in Facebook and Twitter. But when I go into the lists/spreadsheets, a lot of people do not get a stakes, because they stop participating in bounty. The most profitable type of award- signature and youtube.
You are right but i dont think it can be regulated. Project developers are in favor of many bounty participants because it will be bringing their projects to some level and besides the forum does not decide it is still the developer or the campaign manager so it is out of our hands.
I agree with your opinion. I also feel too much to follow the bounty campaign, especially FB and twitter so that minimize the prize in the can.
but I think ico also really need bounty campaign FB and Twitter a lot because it is very helpful for his project to succeed. so I think it's a bit complicated
but I think ico also really need bounty campaign FB and Twitter a lot because it is very helpful for his project to succeed. so I think it's a bit complicated
I think it's not a problem. There are too many campaigns starting everyday, and many people in the crypto world not aware about bounties. It's better to participate in content and translation campaigns as they have less participant.
I think not only bounty participants are increasing, but bounty campaign ico also continues to grow as the world of crypto popularity, so it is actually equivalent or stable. and also the very in pity, the more new ico emerging, the more that fail, so we must be more careful in choosing bounty ico
Social media campaign is one of the most effective means but why bounty managers give very less token allocation compared to others like translation In my opinion most of the investors dont have time to read this language translations thats why bounty managers needs to properly allocate tokens equally depending on users and effectivity I can see only translators got the very high reward compared to those who work more effort to promote the project like the social and signature.
Yes, bounty campaign is getting more and more popular, and there are many new participants also, but it doesn't mean with more participants we earn less rewards for bounty campaign. In fact, there are many bounty campaigns which they didn't limit their participants.
Therefore, ICO project participants must have good knowledge and they need to promote the brand in a positive and effective way. At the same time ,
ICO project participants will need other ideas that are beneficial to the project and contribute to the development of the project.
Bounty itself is one way to get coins without having to invest. Bounty has been widely disseminated and published, therefore, too many people participate in the company but besides that we must always be careful ICO project participants will need other ideas that are beneficial to the project and contribute to the development of the project.
and alert to any future risks ...
Therefore, ICO project participants must have good knowledge and they need to promote the brand in a positive and effective way. At the same time ,
ICO project participants will need other ideas that are beneficial to the project and contribute to the development of the project.
ICO project participants will need other ideas that are beneficial to the project and contribute to the development of the project.
I think the more bounties the better, that means bounty campaigns succeed with more participants then more and more will know about altcoin so in my opinion that is a good thing, no need to be tightened.
Jump to: