Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 89. (Read 10495 times)
I think peoples has right and deserved a chance to participate in bounty even they are newbie. It is the time for them to learn more about alt coins, when they know then there are a probability that they will become an investors in ICO. And it is good for the alt coins existence .
It's just a disaster ... the participants have become so many that there is very little money to earn ...
What do the participants themselves count on when they connect to some kind of bounty, where 3000+ participants already
What do the participants themselves count on when they connect to some kind of bounty, where 3000+ participants already
actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do
I agree with you. They have lot of participants joining in a one bounty campaign. And the total token allocation in a one bounty campaign will be share in the whole participants. If they have so many participants in one campaign the tokens allocation will be less because they many people sharing this token allocation. So if the bounty manager will limit the participant. The token allocation for the whole participant will become bigger because it is less in partipants. 
my opinion is that you need to carefully study quality companies with a bona fide bounty manager, who limits the number of participants and excludes multiaccounts and unscrupulous participants.
I believe that a good bounty company should limit the number of participants, for example no more than 1000 for Twitter or facebook, personally I do not participate in the bounty in which the number of participants is more than 1500 ..
I think bounty that have a lot of participants it means many people believe to it, but for me its better if the bounty manager limit the participant to a better payouts. Also too much participant make the bounty become more known because it means they believe and trust to it without any hesitation of being scam. But even if the bounty has a lot of participant there's a time the manager abandoned it like before i participated. 
I believe that a good bounty company should limit the number of participants, for example no more than 1000 for Twitter or facebook, personally I do not participate in the bounty in which the number of participants is more than 1500 ..
I am thinking that those campaigns that have huge numbers of participants are manage by popular manager in this forum. Basically people put their trust to the person that they know not scammer.
rules should be one, each ICO should limit the number of participants, and another censorship is not needed
actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do
I agree with you. They have lot of participants joining in a one bounty campaign. And the total token allocation in a one bounty campaign will be share in the whole participants. If they have so many participants in one campaign the tokens allocation will be less because they many people sharing this token allocation. So if the bounty manager will limit the participant. The token allocation for the whole participant will become bigger because it is less in partipants.
I believe that sooner or later in each company's bounty there will be restrictions on the number of participants. Perhaps these restrictions should not be introduced for signature of the company, but for companies Facebook and Twitter they will be very relevant. Since the number of participants is increasing every day.
actually I'm worried about this, should bounty managers limit their participants to pay the fees they receive in accordance with what they do
I agree with you. They have lot of participants joining in a one bounty campaign. And the total token allocation in a one bounty campaign will be share in the whole participants. If they have so many participants in one campaign the tokens allocation will be less because they many people sharing this token allocation. So if the bounty manager will limit the participant. The token allocation for the whole participant will become bigger because it is less in partipants.
Actually for me, I think the ICO more participants to participate in the activities of the rewards they will be better, because it can increase their community, increase the coin to encrypt the influence of the world, I think this is not the problem, the new project is increasing every day, participation is also growing, this is normal.
Anyone is eligible to join any bounty campaigns if they want to. But I do agree that as days/weeks passed by, the number of participants in bounty campaigns is increasing. Some may have multiple accounts and joining without a proper knowledge with the project they have joined. But well, since the implementation of the merit system, we should not fear that some of those who joined may post irrelevant replies/threads. Due to this, low quality post has lessen and fake accounts are reduced. Though I still hope that the number of participants in any campaign should have a limit.
I agree with the fact that now there are a lot of participants. Bounty is one way to get coins without having to invest. Bounty has been widely disseminated and publicized, therefore, too many people participate in these companies. Also, don't forget about unscrupulous participants who use multiaccounts. I I have repeatedly faced with scammers and liars.
I think there will be more and more participation in the bounty, because they are becoming more and more popular. From my point of view as a bounty hunter, I want to limit the number of participants, especially in those small pools. But I don't think it's fair. Don't forget, what we are doing is targeting the marketing and promotion activities of our company, and the company will be interested in more ads, the better. So I don't think they're very interested in limiting the number of participants.
The problem is not that the bounty programs involved a large number of people and the fact that investments in ICO is now reduced and new projects extend the terms of fees and reduce bounty pool. If this continues and then wishing to participate in the bounty of the company will become less.
Yes, you are right here, I have noticed it as well. There are so many fake accounts appeared. And there are people who want free money as well, which does not right.
Well more and more who follow the bounty campaign, because no need to spend capital. but it is not easy also because we have to be diligent to find other profitable projects, we can not rely on one project, but no problem it just takes hard work.Bounty campaigns are more and more popular.But it is also fun 
It's not fun to participate for 0-20 weeks and ultimately earn very little,
as there are 4000 participants.
And it would be nice to have some sort of adequate selection.
participants, and most importantly- have a limited number of participant.
as there are 4000 participants.
And it would be nice to have some sort of adequate selection.
participants, and most importantly- have a limited number of participant.
You really have a lot of participant when it comes to payments.
Thousands of participants will actually split.
Unless you join a signature campaign then the attention is calm but when it comes to twitter then it will be another story.
Thousands of participants will actually split.
Unless you join a signature campaign then the attention is calm but when it comes to twitter then it will be another story.
Jump to: