more participants -> less price for stake, yes. But
more participants -> more info -> more advertisement -> more interest to the project -> higher price after exchange listing.
Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 86. (Read 10495 times)
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
To solve this issue and appreciate the work of bounty hunters, I would also suggest that number of participants should be spelled out for each bounty campaign. This will limit the number of participants thus increase the reward for participants. The only disadvantage with this if applied would be that; it will be based on first come first serve but I think that will cool. What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Indeed, there is such a problem. But there is always a bounty company, which is less promising in terms of development, but in which there are much fewer participants! Accordingly, in the future, it can bring you more income!
You're right! Now in large bounty campaigns of large ISO projects, a huge number of students are recruited, but there are examples that bounty managers are gaining a limited number of students, which gives them a chance to earn much more!
You can search bounty campaigns where numbers of participants are restricted, for example to 500 or 1000. There are lot of such campaigns
I think social media bounties are already dead , terrific amount of participants make it useless to participate it . Signature campaigns attract many people too , but high ranked members still able to earn a good money there. I think if crypto will become more popular in the future , the amount of participants will destroy this business , because we do not such a high amount of ICO's with bounty programs , that can satisfy the growing amount of bounty hunters .
Indeed, there is such a problem. But there is always a bounty company, which is less promising in terms of development, but in which there are much fewer participants! Accordingly, in the future, it can bring you more income!
This is true, that is why i am always participating in those bounties who have no more than 300 - 500 participants, otherwise the stakes are not going to be worth nothing because of the amount of participants that are in there (and the pool varies a lot)
300 - 500 participants is also too match. Full member can earn 800 - 1000 dollars per month in bounty campaign with 100-200 participants You can take part in bounty campaigns, which has restricted amount of participants and your rewards will not depend on quantity of bounty hunters
Perhaps in the future bonuses will no longer exist. And if we exist we will get very tokens when there are too many people involved in the campaign. ICO days are banned by government and users do not want to invest in ICO. because of ICO scam.
It's normal. Day by day many newcomers will come in bicointalk and when they will know about bounty campaigns then they will participate in those campaigns for sure. So, it's normal. But I think every campaign should limit participants like bountyhive. Specially needmoney's campaigns! He accepts more than 21K Participants in his bounty campaigns! He should make a limit!
For the project, it is more profitable for more people to advertise them and they do not care that we receive little, the main thing is to invest money in the project! I believe that in the future the rules of participation in the bounty will change and the flow of new people will decrease!
Yes I agree too many members became in companies Bounty. I hope companies will start to limit the number of participants.
on the contrary, I noticed that there are fewer participants, not everyone can do such monotonous work every day.
It's normal. Day by day many newcomers will come in bicointalk and when they will know about bounty campaigns then they will participate in those campaigns for sure. So, it's normal. But I think every campaign should limit participants like bountyhive. Specially needmoney's campaigns! He accepts more than 21K Participants in his bounty campaigns! He should make a limit!
This is true, that is why i am always participating in those bounties who have no more than 300 - 500 participants, otherwise the stakes are not going to be worth nothing because of the amount of participants that are in there (and the pool varies a lot)
That's a tough one; it's definitely an early adoption model for profit, but what sort of regulations can be put in place? How would you define the "Best" participants? Likely any system would only make it suitable for long-term participants/members of some group and only serve to discourage anyone who is just entering the community.
That can't be helped mate. I say that because bounties are one of the best means to earn coins and tokens without actually subjecting yourself to time consuming and too demanding tasks. I mean, the bounties themselves differ in the level of commitment and task your need to give and do, but looking at them in a bigger picture, they are all easy compared to other ventures like trading, which is too risky and complicated, especially for beginners. Another good thing about bounties that it can be chosen by beginners and professionals alike.
You can take part in bounty campaigns, which has restricted amount of participants and your rewards will not depend on quantity of bounty hunters
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
That's actually one of the problems of bounties right now. Because it's so easy to do and so easy to commit into, there are so many participants in every project's bounty that the amount of profit you can earn becomes less because it is divided to more participants. However, that's the aspect we joiners have to accept and endure because bounties is really one of the best means to earn coins and tokens in the market. It's good for beginners and seasoned users, which expands the population that participates in it.
Social media bounties are dead, there are no more good payments, too many participants, too low profit. You can do 20 projects with very very low profit.
Well it really depends if the ico or campaing is doing pretty good. I think more bounty hunters are concerned about joining at the most rewarding campaigns so they study more about them and join to the once that they think will give them the most out of the effort they will put into.
Yes I agree too many members became in companies Bounty. I hope companies will start to limit the number of participants.
Looks like there will be no social media campaigns in future: a lot of people, 10$- for two month of work or something like that. Or we need some limits on it.
LuckyToken doesn't have a lot participants yet so don't waste your time!
That's why I decided to take part in WeLocal because I see my future profitable Jump to: