Topic: Bounty Hard Cap (Read 1363 times)
If such basic details are not being revealed, why should anyone invest in that particular ICO? One of the reasons why we have so many scams in the ICO sector is due to the fact that a lot of investors are ready to invest in projects that are being flagged as suspicious by the community members. These investors are mostly driven by greed and in the end they are almost certain to suffer from crippling losses. If a cryptocurrency project doesn't even reveal the unit price (during the ICO phase), do you think that you should invest in it?
I agree with your view, it will make it easier for us to do what strategies are good in the future and we will be aware of what happens
An ICO project is usually hardcaped because it is a symbol of the success of an ico but is currently under way in the face of the ico amg hard cap due to lack of investment in the ICOs. Normally limits the amount of ico projects of hardcap and if it reaches it is definitely a successful project.its normal to have an high value of hardcap.
It was a pretty strange model that I have seen by some ICOs back in 2018. But it was no so efficient, because nobody really knew how much coins they are going to get. Thats why it is a rarity today to find such a project.
i think its normal if the project has a great plan and great product with excellent member of team also advisor, and the value of over 70M$ was a big value, its surely a big project of ICO.
Yes, this changes according to the project itself. There are even projects with over $100 million hard cap. But there is a possibility of scam. Because, in the current situation, starting sale with the 72 million hard cap is not something that every project can do. i think its normal if the project has a great plan and great product with excellent member of team also advisor, and the value of over 70M$ was a big value, its surely a big project of ICO.
each project also wants good results so they develop a strategy that they think is a good thing. but actually the ICO project is currently in unfavorable conditions because there are so many negative news that people leave the ICO.Although not all ICOs are bad, if we can examine in detail, we can still get a chance from it.
i think its normal if the project has a great plan and great product with excellent member of team also advisor, and the value of over 70M$ was a big value, its surely a big project of ICO.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
Okay, but can you please explain me why the title of this subject is 'Bounty hard cap'? Do you want to start discussion about possible peg to bounty supply in terms of hardcap ? 
Not all ICOs display the total supply on their site, because there are also those who have displayed it. And many ICOs also display fake total raised, this is their strategy to attract investors
If that's always the scenario of every new project ICO, it's so dangerous for all who planned to invest in a certain project. There should be a strict regulations for an ICO, most importantly it should be should be scrutinize by every possible investors whose interested to join in a certain project. Hopefully there's a website whose handling those ico confirmation, that won't passed unless found out legit and promising.
Not all ICOs display the total supply on their site, because there are also those who have displayed it. And many ICOs also display fake total raised, this is their strategy to attract investors
This is a very difficult achievement and you have to check it again. I do not believe that the project can achieve Hard Cap. If you haven't found total inventory, it's better to check with the team, they must be active. But after you check and you doubt, it's better not to join.
Before we give an opinion about whether the project can get so many ICO sales of 72 million dollars, we have to look at what products they are planning and whether they really need so much money to run the company because with so much money if they just building the platform is questionable.
This is a very difficult achievement and you have to check it again. I do not believe that the project can achieve Hard Cap. If you haven't found total inventory, it's better to check with the team, they must be active. But after you check and you doubt, it's better not to join.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
Is high time we should refuse not to be blindfolded with all these face ico projects with fake information on their website trying to get attention of the new investors to their fake project. Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
I understand your frustration, buddy. It is such a common practice to have difficulties finding key token metrics, that I have an urge to vomit sometimes. Such data should be written with letters bigger than the NYSE sign.
72 million dollars is ridiculous and unrealistic in this current market. I don't know what the project aim to achieve with such a hard cap. Look more into the project for an idea of the token but I will definitely pass.
The collected sum is going to be divided by the total supply for sale. At the end you will get a price for one token, but 72 million USD on such a market? I cannot believe that any project can collect so much money right now.
You should not believe such an overestimated performance hardcap. In my opinion, only a few of the vast number of ICO projects have collected amounts in excess of $ 10 million. If even the crypto exchanges admit that they artificially inflate the BTC trading volumes, then ICO projects with their anonymity can easily hide the real amount of invested funds.
hardcap is indeed one of the characteristics of the ico program success, but after being on the market it does not mean that the price of coins is expensive, so do not be affected only on hardcap, but also focus on what projects are being implemented, whether the project is good for everyone or only for some groups obviously this world business so the project must also be broad to reach all circles
the achievement of hardcap is a very desirable and highly anticipated thing, but the current situation of the ICO is so lackluster that many projects do not reach hardcap. sometimes it doesn't even reach the softcap. therefore if the project has achieved hardcap it has become a very good achievement.
Hard cap or not for ICO right now is not have higher potential, almost many ICO success raised hard cap but always have lower price after listing on exchange market, many coin listed with lower price than ICO.
Most ICOs can't reach the hard cap, few did for soft cap.But mostly they can't hit it because people stopped investing.
There's still money for the market but people are skeptic about it.
A big ICO can come from a big business.
But it isn't the very basis that these project can have big demand just because they are like that.
Jump to: