Topic: Bounty Hard Cap - page 7. (Read 1363 times)
in my opinion, it is normal if the project they are developing has good potential for the prospect of going forward in the future according to the vision and mission that has been planned and there are great benefits for its users. but on the other side of the coin, it will be difficult to be able to raise the price to a higher rate, because it has a very large supply amount.
If hard cap is, say, 72 million USD and bounties are 1%, they say they are paying $720,000 in bounties, but in reality they will sell like a tenth of the hard cap and the bounty will also be a tenth of the promised value. Be careful with this math.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
I think that it is possible to collect 72 million dollars in a bear market only by sweeping the project on Binans and specifically pouring a lot of money into the pamp of the future token price.
For the implementation of most projects, no more than $ 10 million is enough, all that is more - will not benefit the project.
I think that at the moment no ICO is impossible to raise so much money, so this is not a normal hard cap. I would not participate in the bounty of the company of such a project and especially invest in such an ICO.
Projects should adjust their hard cap targets with the market situation.
Many of the projects are overestimating their hard cap and it has nothing to do with the reality.
It also tells a lot about that project.
Many of the projects are overestimating their hard cap and it has nothing to do with the reality.
It also tells a lot about that project.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
If hardcap, of course token sales reach 100%. You can see how much the total supply of tokens that are posted during ICO. If you are a prize participant, you are promised a fee based on the percentage of supply. Then you can calculate the total supply with the total percent for the bounty.
Really good projects are gaining more. Take only the development of Pavla Durov. He collected several billion in a very short amount of time. If people are really interested, then big fees are inevitable)
I also often can not find information about the collected funds on the site. I don't understand why the project team is hiding this. I think this is not a good sign for the project. I believe that all should be openly.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
Often, negotiations with large, individual investors are lengthening and until developers end up, not wanting to disclose the right numbers. I am sure that after closing all negotiations and signing contracts, the project will reveal all figures regarding the number of tokens sold and the amount of bonuses.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
for me it's natural that they target high hard cap, at this point investor has no confidence in ico because there are many scam project and the difficult reality for the ico project can penetrate sofcap
Well hard cap are crazy target initial coin offering developers set for them selves most times investors and bounty hunters are more interested in project surpassing at least there soft cap. Only few projects hit hard cap
If this data is not specified, the project may be fraudulent. You can not blindly believe all the information provided to us. I think every project should immediately announce the number of coins of the issue.
Many ICO always update fake news for getting many investor, how ever I check many ICO raised hard cap but always have lower price after listing on exchange market, maybe they make fake news and they do not raised hard cap for ICO.
It has become so common how ICOs give this kind of misleading news just in a bid to mislead incoming or new investors but sometimes this idea of inflating hard cap does not even work for investors because there is possibility of investors having doubts except otherwise the ICOs have been known with a good reputation. Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
right now you can't trust almost anyone. Once, most of the ico have a counter on their official site... but now? Only few of them..
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
72 million dollars are just too much for an ICO to create a great platform, we seldom have seen a project or ICO getting funded that huge amount right now, I think it's fake its part of the strategy I seldom see ICO that will show you how many funds they've got, developers hate to be ignored so they will try to manipulate.
I myself am still confused about that but it seems like a natural thing, because there are so many projects like that
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
You should watch how many tokens or coins are for sale, usually it is around 50% of total supply. Also, I think that number in Soft Cap is more important to watch than Hard Cap number. Hard Cap is just best scenario for project, but Soft Cap is money without which they can not continue their project.
Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?
It's hard to make a computation because there is no name of the project like all the other with the same opinion, ICOs are faking their hardcap this is an old strategy to attract investors and make the projects look good in the eyes of everybody.
Most ICOs do not deserve their hardcap. I think the undeserving ones are just being greedy. Many of them are decentralized applications with very simple concepts that do not deserve even their softcap
We can't discuss their decision based on market conditions and bounty hunters are not patient enough for listing on the exchanges. Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar?
It could be.But I have not seen such projects for a long time.By and large,if the project is ambitious and it needs such a large amount money,then at least the project team should provide an open access smart contract. Jump to: