Topic: Bounty hunters hurting themselves? - page 3. (Read 679 times)
Bounty hunters do not have what it takes to cause a dump to any project. I do not know, most times when a coin dumps, the first thing that occur to some people is that bounty hunters cause it. Whereas i have seen newly listed coins dump, despite bounty hunters not paid. Investors most times cause dump. They would dump all they have, expecting the price to fall more,so that they can buy back.
It occurred to me today that with the market in this fragile state bounty hunters could end up ruining bounties and having this opportunity closed off to them in the future if the dumping continues as soon as the tokens are released and an exchange begins trading. The coins just cannot handle the dump at this time with the market so low and everyone so timid. The projects will find a different means of promotion as paying us in their tokens will no longer be an option as it would harm the project to much.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
So maybe this is one of the reason of the delaying destribution of the reward tokens , this may give favor to the investor and this is a good move for the ICO , though its the rights of all bounties to dump their tokens anytime when it is already sellable in the exchange so lets give respect to it.
I would like to see bounty programs weed out more of the folks who just spam social media. Quality over quantity.
I understand your concerns but the owners of the ico probably prefer to have as much publicity out there as possible, for them it is way better to have a lot of quantity even if it's very low quality than to have high quality but low quantity, I know that in a perfect world we will prefer quantity but since most icos are trying to obtain as much money as they can in order to develop their projects then they prefer to get as many impressions in social media so they can raise the awareness of their project among the community. 
It occurred to me today that with the market in this fragile state bounty hunters could end up ruining bounties and having this opportunity closed off to them in the future if the dumping continues as soon as the tokens are released and an exchange begins trading. The coins just cannot handle the dump at this time with the market so low and everyone so timid. The projects will find a different means of promotion as paying us in their tokens will no longer be an option as it would harm the project to much.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Of course yes, but the market factor of being a dump is not always caused by the hunters, the most influential factor is market conditions, as the current downward trend is so strong that it is very influential on any altcoin including tokens that have just come out of ico.
currently there are new regulations, JR cannot join the signature campaign and this is good. because I think that most of them don't care about the rules.
I would like to see bounty programs weed out more of the folks who just spam social media. Quality over quantity.
I think this question is incorrect. The organizers of the generosity company can slow down the flow of coins to the exchanges in many ways, they can enter the exchanges with a long delay after the end of the bounty, in a word , the rate of the new token can be regulated only by the team, the only exception is 100% issue of tokens to the exchanges simultaneously. After that, nothing but real supply and demand will be able to manage the new token.
i think dumb price because more than 1 factor....
And 1-2% alocation fund for bounty, i think not enough to make the token price dumb.
If that happen, surely just 1-2 weeks. After that price will be back to normal (if big investor not brutal selling)
I actually agree with you. I think the bounty hunters don't have much influence in making the price situation on the market. It is precisely the top big investors, who can do a little price shift. It is unlikely that the bounty hunter affects prices in the market. Confuse! And 1-2% alocation fund for bounty, i think not enough to make the token price dumb.
If that happen, surely just 1-2 weeks. After that price will be back to normal (if big investor not brutal selling)
It it is a promising project there should be a huge demand for the tokens and they will grab that 1% of total supply
what hunters get. And I am sure hunters will not sell their tokens either (at least not all)
what hunters get. And I am sure hunters will not sell their tokens either (at least not all)
I am sure that the coins that have bounty hunters are not enough to bring down the cost. I think investors themselves sell and underestimate the value of coins. The General state of the market and the project itself also plays a role.
Bounty hunters are blamed of all of this because investors do not want to think that they made a mistake when investing in that ico, they prefer to blame those that they see as guilty of making the price to go down because they got their coins without paying for them, what they do not seem to get is that bounty hunters did not got those coins for free, they work for them so they paid for those coins even if they did not paid money. 
It is already obvious that this is happening. So many stupid and not knowing people are just starting to bring down this market and much more. All the hayatt get easy money, think that here you can just come and rip off the jackpot. No one wants to work and understand how everything happens. I think that soon we will come to what will have to pay to take lessons in the bounty.
Do you know how many tokens are given to bounty hunters? Of course that cannot be used as a benchmark that those who cause prices to be destroyed because only a small part of the total supply is available and remember that not all bounty hunters do what you think because I believe there are still many bounty hunters who continue to hold tokens from the results for a long time even more than 1 year so the project with a token fee will not experience a loss because the dev has got the results from the sale of the ICO they did.
i think dumb price because more than 1 factor....
And 1-2% alocation fund for bounty, i think not enough to make the token price dumb.
If that happen, surely just 1-2 weeks. After that price will be back to normal (if big investor not brutal selling)
Yes I think so and we can't blame bounty Hunter because the price of crypto are always fluctuate and that's normal phenomenon in crypto world. Not all bounty Hunter sell their token immediately after they received the token, a lot for them hold it because they are also want to get more profit. And 1-2% alocation fund for bounty, i think not enough to make the token price dumb.
If that happen, surely just 1-2 weeks. After that price will be back to normal (if big investor not brutal selling)
there are more recent news about the bounty hunter, the total supply allocation for the bounty is burned, because the project in the ICO period does not reach hardcap, their reason is to avoid dumping on the market, always like that the bounty is made a scapegoat
All of us are facing difficult times in crypto space, indeed. But I would not blame bounty hunters for what are they doing. In my opinion, they have barely the power to move the price drastically. Some of us are not interested in selling tokens under the ICO price as well. Depends a lot. I would say that the irrational fear has infected mentality of investors and they are willing to short their tokens while playing a hazardous game of people´s attention.
Bounty hunters are (I think) doing their best to not let managers wipe out their stakes. Many of them spend hours doing some type of asks just to come with -90% what they expected they would have. Well, it seems like bounty hunters hurt themselves psychically by doing bounties, basically
.
Bounty hunters are (I think) doing their best to not let managers wipe out their stakes. Many of them spend hours doing some type of asks just to come with -90% what they expected they would have. Well, it seems like bounty hunters hurt themselves psychically by doing bounties, basically
.
I am sure that the coins that have bounty hunters are not enough to bring down the cost. I think investors themselves sell and underestimate the value of coins. The General state of the market and the project itself also plays a role.
On average a project only spends 1-2% on bounty campaigns, so bounty hunters can not influence market prices. And bounty hunters have worked to get the coin or token so they have the power to decide whether to sell or not.
Everybody in the game has the me me me mentality, they don't think far ahead otherwise we wouldn't see the huge selloffs that happen after most terrible bounties. There are a few bounty hunters that completely ruin the system for everybody, and may eventually lead to ICOs not running bounties anymore due to the massive risk of abuse.
Bounty hunters are not the one dumping tokens most times. We first need to know that there is no much confidence in the market and even investors are alway ps ready yo dump in other to reduce their loss.
The volume of bounty token is not enough to dump a project, I have involved in many campaigns that delay in paying bounty hunters and yet it got dump. Investors and even some project team that are not trust worthy are part of the problem.
normally bounty hunters do not have so many coins to make significant dump on market. investorsare the pople who thingk that it will dump with the bounty token release and they can buy back later more tokens from the ETH or BTC if they sell before or during bounty token release.
This is especially true for all of those tokens that give huge bonuses to the people that invest very early, those people have no incentive to keep holding their coins because if they sell their coins at ico price then they will obtain 10% and in some cases up to 40% of profits just by selling their coins, in fact they can sell for a price lower than the ico price and still obtain profits, something that no one else can do. Jump to: