I think that Bounty hunters should be very thankful for this opportunity to earn some tokens for "Free" and do not complain all the time,
We don't complain,dude. Many of earned tokens are still not listed on exchange.
Topic: Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH - page 17. (Read 4586 times)
We don't complain,dude. Many of earned tokens are still not listed on exchange.
Honestly, I'm optimistic about this ICO project, so I'd rather get a token instead of Ethereum.
I do not think paying Ethereum is a better option.
I do not think paying Ethereum is a better option.
It will be good if the bounty hunters are paid in ETH but soon the coin gets listed on an exchange site chances are you are most likely to trade your coin in exchange of ETH so either way you are getting paid into ETH.
I won sat that us a good idea, because most of the token gotten from ico by the bounty hunters are not of the same value with ethereum and thus can leads to loss.
I think that this is a good idea because it is very often when we see dump of the price just because of the bounty hunters. The best way would be if the bounty hunter could choose how he or she is paid in eth or in tokens.
I don't think they will always pay us tokens. We can earn only when the tokens increase. 
i would like that very well. i also prefer ethereum instead of token.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
There is an obvious reason for that. By allocating a certain percentage of the sold token during ICO, they tend to go on a safer side saving the company an extra expense and answering participants for the low allocation to the bounty. By setting a predefined amount for the bounty, they might incur a huge expense and if the ICO didn't turn out to be well, they might not even able to pay anything. That can land them in a scam accusation. 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
it is not impossible to do but the likelihood is very small because the coins that are launched become difficult to circulate in the market and difficult to be known by others so paying with coins that are launched is better for advertising as well
Yes true. This can bring more legitimacy in the bounties if that really ever happen. I mean they should make the bounties in similar way they pay for the signature campaigns of the BTC. If they do it that way then they will have to pay the fixed amount of ETH and thus there will be no more dumping of the coins in the later time when they get listed over the exchanger. I think thats the best idea anyone can have. Good one! But if that happens then they will have to pay from their early funds to manage this all. There could be always way around this though.
There are some ICO`s that pays the bounty hunters in ETH, but mostly of them paying the hunter as there altcoins but in this method hunters needed to wait till there coin was listed in some strategy. So it was better to pay the hunters directly with ETH.
Yes, I think like that too.
It's good for founders too.
Cause a lot of bounty hunters sell tokens immediately after they get tokens, thus lowering the price of a token and dumping it.
It's good for founders too.
Cause a lot of bounty hunters sell tokens immediately after they get tokens, thus lowering the price of a token and dumping it.
I agree with this, but it is good to be paid in tokens because you can speculate with the price that those are going to have in a near future, i think that a 50 - 50 would be good
I agree with that 50-50 with token and Eth or btc would be good, since they cannot just give in ETH because rewarding the participants with token is part of their token distribution.
50-50 ratio will put a lot of pressure on the ICO promoters, as a large part of their earnings will be gone. I would rather suggest paying 10% or 20% of the reward in ETH. In this case, the bounty campaign participants will not face the risk of working for free, and the ICO promoters will be having enough ETH with them to promote their project.
I agree since 10-20% of the allocated pool for the bounty to be converted to ETH and be distributed to the bounty participants would be better. Also this opens up an opportunity for the tokens in the market to have a better circulation thru trading as it will lessen the pump and dump by groups or the bounty participants.
I think they should add an option wherein if they want to be paid on eth or tokens. Though I like having it in tokens since having atleast 5 digit number of tokens can give you more eth.
I think it's great if bounty hunter is paid directly using eth. because it will minimize the losses incurred by ico that is not listing in the market as soon as possible. however bounty hunter works a lot to promote ongoing ico products.
not all bounty hunters will like paying the etherium, some will leave coins for a long time in the hope of their take-off
I think that Bounty hunters should be very thankful for this opportunity to earn some tokens for "Free" and do not complain all the time,
if we get paid using ETH then very wise, my question is who will exchange tokens from the project if we get paid using ETH? paying with ETH will only make the project dead
I do not think that this should be a prerequisite. But the thought is good. I think that people who diligently work for the sake of project success throughout the whole campaign bounty are worthy to choose in which currency to receive their rewards.
I agree with this, but it is good to be paid in tokens because you can speculate with the price that those are going to have in a near future, i think that a 50 - 50 would be good
I agree with that 50-50 with token and Eth or btc would be good, since they cannot just give in ETH because rewarding the participants with token is part of their token distribution.
50-50 ratio will put a lot of pressure on the ICO promoters, as a large part of their earnings will be gone. I would rather suggest paying 10% or 20% of the reward in ETH. In this case, the bounty campaign participants will not face the risk of working for free, and the ICO promoters will be having enough ETH with them to promote their project.
Jump to: