Topic: Bounty Hunters: What makes a good bounty program? (Read 1177 times)
first of all, bounty is better than others when that is a real project) good team and managers, guarantee of payment and the higher percent of total tokens the better!)
best bounty program depend on -
- first thing is for which ico bounty program launched , ico also must have a value , otherwise bounty is not worth .
- who is bounty manager
- response rate to queries by bounty hunters
- weekly updated stakes without any miss
- properly checking reports and works and then only give stakes
- clarity about all the bounties
- appropriate budget for each type of bounty
- timing / bounty period , if it is longer then budget also should be more
- etc etc
- first thing is for which ico bounty program launched , ico also must have a value , otherwise bounty is not worth .
- who is bounty manager
- response rate to queries by bounty hunters
- weekly updated stakes without any miss
- properly checking reports and works and then only give stakes
- clarity about all the bounties
- appropriate budget for each type of bounty
- timing / bounty period , if it is longer then budget also should be more
- etc etc
For me a very profitable bounty program is a lesser participants with a promising project. We know that many participants will result lesser bounty rewards on the distribution time and sometimes it is not really worth it. That is why my strategy is to join bounty campaign with lesser people but great concept of the project.
probably in terms of rewards and also offers we have made after working on the contract. as long as using the contract does not release a signature that was already approved from the beginning.
The good bounty program when they have a good support team and have a bounty of good management manager, In addition the ICO must also be appreciated,...
several thing makes a bounty good for example, team managers, good amount of money, fast payout, outcome of their ICO sale
In your mind, what makes a good bounty program better than another? Payouts, process, etc...
As a bounty hunter, I also want to earn big moneys in participating on good and legit bounties. I think what makes a good bounty program better is there team that manage thier bounties because without them we bounty hunters can't have rewards, next is the amount allocated in the bounty programs , the higher the allocation, the higher amount of money can bounty hunters will earn, and the outcome of their ICO sale, if it is successful then there is a chance that the team will give bonuses to the bounty hunters. 
For me a good bounty is what can give us a fast payout, But surely we can not know it before bounty is finished, So in determining a good bounty I will see the history of bounty manager,
Just want to let you know, Bounty manager has nothing to do with the payout. It's all distributed from the DEV of that ICO. Bounty managers only manage bounty, then they will send the sheet to DEVFor all you have to say something important. That's all the package. The best program is actually Bounty. Here we get money so we do not get rid of Thanks ..
You are the one who didn't say any important on here.In your mind, what makes a good bounty program better than another? Payouts, process, etc...
For me a good bounty is what can give us a fast payout, But surely we can not know it before bounty is finished, So in determining a good bounty I will see the history of bounty manager,
in my opinion to make bounty program to be very nice and can be interesting is seen from the allocation of tokens that are given and viewed from the bounty manager, with bounty manager who is always active record all stake participants bounty campaign with timely will give a good impression and make the bounty program a good one.
the forum has already created specific topics, where there are Bounty managers' ratings, which are provided by bounty hunters themselves. Of course, not always a successful choice of a Bounty company manager brings you good results of the company itself Bounty. Even managers are able to make mistakes. 
in my opinion to make bounty program to be very nice and can be interesting is seen from the allocation of tokens that are given and viewed from the bounty manager, with bounty manager who is always active record all stake participants bounty campaign with timely will give a good impression and make the bounty program a good one.
it seems that when talking about things like this everyone has different opinions, and I think that makes a good bounty program is when the manager can manage and provide the stake on time.
Since bounty programs are not a charity event... We all have high expectations for our own expected value. 
The more value, the better program!
The more value, the better program!
A good bounty program is dedicated to professional deploy of the project generally, within crypto society.It must be lead by experienced bounty manager who will closely develop bounty goals and cooperate with project developers.
Well bounty manager is one of the big factor why bounty hunters participate in a bounty because it would mean they already have a reputation of being trusted and pay the participants with what they work for. One should also look at the basis of the token distribution amount if it is fixed or depends on the token sale because it would be an advantage if it is fixed because even if the bounty will take a long time to finish, you know that you can receive the same amount of tokens compared to not being fixed and you can only receive a little amount as more people join the campaign.
For all you have to say something important. That's all the package. The best program is actually Bounty. Here we get money so we do not get rid of Thanks ..
I think the most important thing make a bounty campaign become a good bounty campaign to join is ICO project behind 
. If there are two bounty campaigns, the first one has very large amount of token spend for bounty but ICO project behind it is not really good and the second one has lower amount of token spend for bounty but has a great project behind so you think which one will be better? I can ensure that the second one will be the target of all bounty hunters .
. If there are two bounty campaigns, the first one has very large amount of token spend for bounty but ICO project behind it is not really good and the second one has lower amount of token spend for bounty but has a great project behind so you think which one will be better? I can ensure that the second one will be the target of all bounty hunters .
I try to choose a company bounty where soft capa is at least 10 million dollars. And bounty pool - from 2%.
I also look at the percentage distribution of the campaign.
I also look at the percentage distribution of the campaign.
Having a good bounty program is good chances for all bounty hunter to earn money and also to have a good communication with those people who belongs to the bounty projects. However choosing a good bounty campaign or project are quite difficult because often scam ICO's are spreading so it is better for all bounty hunters to study on how to choose a legitimate bounty program that could be paid them for their works and sacrifices for spending time, money and at the same time their efforts to participates in bounty projects.
In your mind, what makes a good bounty program better than another? Payouts, process, etc...
Bounty pool is important, it should be large enough. Also the distribution percentage of the campaign you are planning to join should be large, such as 35% for signiture campaign. 
A good bounty program is dedicated to professional deploy of the project generally, within crypto society.It must be lead by experienced bounty manager who will closely develop bounty goals and cooperate with project developers.
Jump to: