Topic: Bounty Hunters: What makes a good bounty program? - page 9. (Read 1156 times)

I met a lot of ICO, airdrop and bounty companies that behaved unexpectedly.  Some bounty last more than half a year and are regularly paid, but more often the opposite happens. It also happens that ICO, airdrop and bounty which seem completely unsuccessful suddenly become profitable. So the rules should be adhered to, but they do not always work.

Well different aspects are important in my opinion I try to put them in my personal order of importance

1 duration, is not worth to do a 7months bounty from the start, cause if it turns out in a scam a lot of work is gone, if you want to join a long campaign w8 some months
2 prize pooln, generally they use 2000+ eth on title but is not the real prize, is based on hard cap and a low % of ico goes to hardcap, I like to see the % when is 3%+ it's very good to join when is 0.5% i pass
3 managering is quite important, the constant update of spreadsheet is important but no essential only if the manager will listen hunters later!
4 I really hate when manager change rules every few days, I have lost stacks for this reason and in future i will never join campaign on the same manager. I will join only if the prize pool is really good.
5 on prize pool look what is your rank/number of follower, for example if a campaign give 1000 stacks for 100k follower. 100 stacks for 50k follower 25 stacks for 10k followers 5 stacks for 5k, don't even join, the whale will take almost everything. (random numbers only to give the idea)

The important thing is try to join the best campaign for your status to get the max advantage, for example if you need a signature campaign, join a campaign with good reward like 30%+ bounty prize pool and maybe weekly payment, with 1 month duration

Bounty Allocation- Budget for a good campaign signature for social media, translation and moderator. but i almost look at the spreadsheet if there's alot of members joining then the project is totally superb.

Payouts and process. A manager has to be reliable and communicate very fast to solve many issues.

for me is the way how they manage the bounty campaign, bounty manager is the most important thing here, and also check the Ann thread do your own research about the team behind the project read white paper etc, because not all bounty campaign is worth it.

We made additional bounty functionality to our exchange project: Ziggurat token TELEGRAM BOUNTY - JOIN OUR CHANNEL AND GET 30 ZIG
https://ico.ecex.exchange/telegram-bounty-join-our-channel-and-get-40-zig/
Telegram https://t.me/ZigguratICO
Log in our INHOUSE BOUNTY  https://ecex.exchange/

Competent bounty manager. The project is focused on new technologies. Clear rules for the company's bounty. Feedback from the community.

of course the good and innovative project of the coin is the most important factor for us to see the coin is good or not

In my opinion good payment method and clear stake distribution makes good bounty programme and it helps to attract bounty hunters for there bounty programme

 Great feedback often happens in projects with SCAM. But then, when the money is collected, no one answers.

to me i think good explanation of the bounty and how good the ICO is

I think that a good bounty company is when: campaign rules are clearly spelled out and do not change, competent bounty manager, and of course generous payouts.

Look for the product/services that this ICO has to offer. Does it have a real chance of success? You you might consider reading whitepaper too, join their telegram channel and ask the developers if you have any questions. Check the founder's and developer's background. Are they competent? The roadmap must be clear, short and long term goals are needed.
Lastly, check community's feedback to the project. If they received positive feedbacks - join!

I think what it important in bounty campaign is to have all the rules communicate clearly. Also, it is important to have a bounty manager who's responsive to the community, as each campaign differ than the other communication would make it easier for both.

Great feedback! What about payout?  I've seen anywhere from 0.25% to 2% of total tokens.  How important is this to you?

It has a good thread in BTT, The Campaign manager is competent and has lots of good feedback on their previous work. The community of the Bounty is welcoming and the admins can answer if you have any doubts about the campaign. Well explained white paper and good presentation, Roadmap is very clear and can really attain its target date of completion.

In your mind, what makes a good bounty program better than another?  Payouts, process, etc...