Topic: Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony (Read 1092 times)
obviously the bounty managers are not obliged to wear the signature of the project they are curating, managing even if it would be a sign of consistency, support and trust if they did, but like all bounty hunters they look for the most profitable signatures such as those of casinos, sports bets that pay more and also in bitcoins
Why should a manager participate in his Bounty company and spend his time writing posts, if he already has a lot of work, taking into account filling out spreadsheets of Not only the signature campaign, but also social networks.
I believe that the Bounty manager receives a large enough remuneration not to participate at all in the Bounty company that he represents. Today, Bounty Hunters receive too little rewards and for a Bounty manager this is a trifle. Moreover, considering that managers run several companies at the same time.
I believe that the Bounty manager receives a large enough remuneration not to participate at all in the Bounty company that he represents. Today, Bounty Hunters receive too little rewards and for a Bounty manager this is a trifle. Moreover, considering that managers run several companies at the same time.
Whats wrong with bounty managers using bitcoin signature ? Ibknow most of bitcoin maxis is not support ICO. They usually call it scam or shitcoin. But i think there are still many bitcoiner which support altcoin. Vitalik it self was bitcoiner maxis.
there really isn't a problem with that. bounty managers want to get something more definite than what they can work on. while the campaigns they promote are sometimes only in small numbers. of course, joining in another campaign that pays them with payment definitely doesn't hurt as long as he complies with the expected qualifications and rules.This forum is free for anyone with interests and goals.
There are no rules binding bounty managers to participate in other manager campaigns.
develop yourself to achieve your own goals.
The irony is, why they will find another campaign while the one they are managing has open slot, it just mean that the Bounty Manager has no confidence on the bounty campaign that they manage which I agree partly especially when The bounty manager is applying on signature campaign while running the campaign for almost a week or more.
But I get why Bounty manager still looking for campaign on Services section. Some of them is looking for a define payment in Bitcoin for a short period of time. But it's really ironic seeing this kind of scenario. #Realtalk
Whats wrong with bounty managers using bitcoin signature ? Ibknow most of bitcoin maxis is not support ICO. They usually call it scam or shitcoin. But i think there are still many bitcoiner which support altcoin. Vitalik it self was bitcoiner maxis.
there really isn't a problem with that. bounty managers want to get something more definite than what they can work on. while the campaigns they promote are sometimes only in small numbers. of course, joining in another campaign that pays them with payment definitely doesn't hurt as long as he complies with the expected qualifications and rules.This forum is free for anyone with interests and goals.
There are no rules binding bounty managers to participate in other manager campaigns.
develop yourself to achieve your own goals.
Whats wrong with bounty managers using bitcoin signature ? Ibknow most of bitcoin maxis is not support ICO. They usually call it scam or shitcoin. But i think there are still many bitcoiner which support altcoin. Vitalik it self was bitcoiner maxis.
Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.
All bounty managers are kind of freelancers. Ever seen a freelancer doing only one single work/task/project ? These kind of freelancers probably dying from hunter, but our bounty managers (I'm sure in this) have a habit to eat at least 3 times per day.
Wearing a signature is not the only to care about the project and promotion? Take a look for example on bubbalex. He never wears signature of a project he manages, but he continues to post news and manage ANN topic even after bounty is over.
I don't find that ironic. I worked in a marketing agency, does that mean I should have changed my lifestyle every time I promoted some new brand as part of my job? Did I have to change my car every time I run a campaign for another car brand?
And what about when I run two campaigns at the same time? How should I decide which brand to promote?
And what about when I run two campaigns at the same time? How should I decide which brand to promote?
I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 
They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.
They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.
We need to understand that bounty managers are humans just as we are, with different needs; if a bounty manager is hosting an AAA Bounty with 40$ rewards; then has an offer to wear signature for a bounty BBB with 75$ rewards, As regards altcoin bounties, you never can tell if the bounty manager will receive the tokens as part of payment, which means they do not necessarily have to work with the bounty or if the bm needs the btc payment even more urgently; it is only naturally that he goes for the big and better pay for present need.
Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.
Your jokes are not funny, buddy, You speak like that because you have never been a bounty manager. Lol. You need to know, BM task is only to manage the campaign and there is no agreement that requiring BM uses the signature and avatar of a particular project that she is managing. What if BM is managing 2 or 3 campaigns at the same time, whether they should use the signature and avatar at the same time too.
Think.Here we don't need to put BM in a corner because they don't use the signature of the project they are managing. They are just like us, have a human nature and of course they also want to get more income to support their children and their wives.
Look at how they work. CryptopreneurBrainboss, yahoo62278, Hhampuz, pakhitheboss and some other trusted managers. They use different signature and avatar, but the projects they work on are always being hunted down by bounty hunter.
They are very selective when accepting an offer to manage a bounty, because if the project they are working with becomes a scam, hence their good name is at stake.
We have to thank them, because with a trusted bounty manager like them, will make our work as a bounty hunter easier.
And it needs to be underlined, No bounty manager wants a project they work on to fail.
Mate, it is ok if you thinks like that, but there are some possibilities that makes bounty managers not wear the signature of their handled bounties.
For example, before they manage bounty campaign, they already have or currently participating on signature campaign of other project (maybe the payment is better) so they still wear the signature from other campaign while manage their bounty campaign.
I think there is no bounty manager wants the project they handle to fail and leave them unpaid.
For example, before they manage bounty campaign, they already have or currently participating on signature campaign of other project (maybe the payment is better) so they still wear the signature from other campaign while manage their bounty campaign.
I think there is no bounty manager wants the project they handle to fail and leave them unpaid.
Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.
Put up yourself on managers situation, for sure we would really be doing the same thing when it comes on how we do look for work and trying to make money as much as we can.We cant just stick out on a project and be loyal because if we do consider on how many fraud projects in the market in the end of the bounty then as a manager then you are
really aware on that kind of situation where you cant just trust up even you are the ones who do make out some community handling for them.
They would always go to the secure side of things of which an understandable thing.
Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.
I don't think that there is anything wrong in bounty managers wearing signatures from other campaigns. Most of the managers take care of multiple projects and it is not practical for them to display the signature from all the projects that they are managing. Also, most of the bounty campaigns last for one or two months, while many of the signature campaigns (which make the payment in BTC) are more long lasting. Why should the bounty managers leave their trusted signature campaign to display the bounty signature?
They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
Promoting a product/service and helping promote something are two different things. You might promote something but as a job, you are helping someone promote their project. If they are promoting a scam though, that's where it is wrong.They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.
Yeah, that but also the fact that bounty in altcoins pays much less as compared to the BTC or direct payment campaigns. Campaign managers are also participants in other campaigns and everyone wants the highest possible payment for the efforts they put into writing posts.Consider this, does an actor promoting a product always use that product? No. they are promoting it as they don't mind doing it but they use something else because they prefer it.
Also, going as per your logic what will happen if a bounty manager is promoting multiple campaigns? They cannot wear them all at the same time, right?
Yes, some might agree with you that if you help promote a project you should also promote it, but I don't see a problem in either of the two.
I do not find it funny. I think it is fine to wear a signature, a avatar and be in a project supporting it for all different projects. It is just space on your forum profile in the end.
I do believe in supporting AND using the project you promote though,,, I think the stranger thing to point out is not many people actually use the service that they are promoting.
I do believe in supporting AND using the project you promote though,,, I think the stranger thing to point out is not many people actually use the service that they are promoting.
If the owners want their manager to where their signature codes well that's another contract that needed to be discuss and the payment from it is separate from bounty campaign managing.
The idea is the bounty managers don't need to take up bounty jobs they know are shit and that owners won't pay, or that are not listed and trading. Some bounty hunters have shit tokens in their wallets that are not in exchange for a long time and that means a wasted time while bounty managers have received their payment either in dollar, bitcoin, etheruem etc.anyhow
Not most important about bounty campaign manager use different signature code from his bounty manage depend if payment running well and on time, I think most have debate right now why bounty campaign manager not distribution coin on the schedule because ICO project have early send coin to bounty manager, why they want waiting for coin distribution after have cheap price.
I agree that many Bounty are simply using investors to draw out money. There is no guarantee that you will receive the promised reward. Now people do not care about their decency and conscience, everyone wants one thing - to earn, and it does not matter in an honest way or by deception. When I hear about giveaways that promise big rewards, it makes me laugh. After a huge number of negative reviews, I'm generally surprised that someone else believes that it is really possible to make money on the Bounty. Better not to waste your time on this pointless activity.
I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.
I do not see anything bad or unusual in this. If payment for a subscription campaign is made in bitcoins, such a campaign usually lasts a very long time, sometimes for years, and there is a strictly limited number of participants. If you reset this signature, then you probably won't go back there.I have also seen a similar situation several times. However, if the bounty campaign manager carries a fresh signature of a company that is paid with tokens, then this is really suspicious.
I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.
One of the guys seating on the fence, funny again.
Quote
They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.
This is contradicting yourself. And it means you are understanding my view.
Have you seen a signature campaign manager wearing bounty logo? But bounty managers wear signature logo. The point is they can clear up the bounty by bringing up bounties that pay with bnb, etheruem, litecoin, monero and many other high value altcoins.
There's nothing to debate about this since signature campaign management job is focus to handle the campaign and give the weekly reports(counting the post made) to the owners and signatures space is not included in this package. If the owners want their manager to where their signature codes well that's another contract that needed to be discuss and the payment from it is separate from bounty campaign managing.
Jump to: