OP why not you become a bounty manager and demand BTC payments for every campaign you are managing?
Bounties are profitable in 2017 and that's the end of it, any real investors rarely invest on the projects based on bounties in 2021.
Topic: Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony - page 4. (Read 1083 times)
Many bounties campaign manager not using signature code like what his campaign promoting because they not sure with his project promotion and think now worth it only take earning from bounty campaign, so he try to get income with other signature campaign. Looks funny he come he can promote other campaign but why not use his bounty campaign, does his campaign is not profitable or become shit coin so try to promote other project?
MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING
This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
OP thinks that bounty managers can demand from the team to pay in BTC or USDT for all the participants but why they should do when people are available to work for free?This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
Only if a bounty hunter changes the manager will be forced to change or else nothing is going to be changed.
Well, this depends upon their agreement, so to sum up, Bounty Managers here in the forum are just also like us Sig Participants.
IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.
Well as you can see in this thread it is indeed a big deal LoL. (sarcasm maybe?)Job is a job and what he is wearing on his profile it's his decision.
Just like what I've said earlier Money speaks louder above all here, and I think that applies to every CM here especially those who have been offered a long time business, not just here on altcoin but on bitcoin paid campaigns as well Hello guys, please lets not make mess of this thread. We can read the page again to really get the intent ,gist and dynamics of the post and not politicize it or count post with it. 
I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.
It is not about getting political, looks like the OP has a satirical way of asking why the altcoin campaign managers are enrolled in BTCitcoin based campaigns and it has the same over all outlook what you mentioned on bounty managers to look for change in the dynamics of the reward. I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.
Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.
It is basically not possible if they are promoting a project as the team is trying to collect money for the project and if they start giving out BTCitcoin and other valuable asset it will be a big burden from the beginning and no team will be willing to take that risk if they are currently having a limited budget and since everything is transparent on how the rewards are distributed if you think that the bounty is not worth then you can skip that as well and there are a few projects that gives out bounty in valuable asset and the percentage is really low when you compare the overall bounty landscape Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.
. I've seen a bounty manager that has promoted different bounty, so it's up to him if he will promote by wearing a signature on his profile or not. His job is to run the campaign, that's it, wearing a signature is another thing, but as long as he do his main job effectively, I think there's no problem with that.
I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.
IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.
Job is a job and what he is wearing on his profile it's his decision. Maybe he is dealing with couple of bounties at the same time and etc. It's not on us to tell anything. I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.
IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.
I've seen a bounty manager that has promoted different bounty, so it's up to him if he will promote by wearing a signature on his profile or not. His job is to run the campaign, that's it, wearing a signature is another thing, but as long as he do his main job effectively, I think there's no problem with that.
I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.
IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.
I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.
IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.
One bounty manager can promote multiple campaigns at once so how they can support all the projects at once? because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.
Bounty manager also hired by the team to managed the participants and calculate stakes if bounty wants the manager to wear the signature then they may wear it for appropriate payment but as far as I know most bounty managers work for partial BTC payment and remaining in their tokens and no bounties fall under this category may not get interested by them.
Bounty manager also hired by the team to managed the participants and calculate stakes if bounty wants the manager to wear the signature then they may wear it for appropriate payment but as far as I know most bounty managers work for partial BTC payment and remaining in their tokens and no bounties fall under this category may not get interested by them.
yeah, they do not have to support project which promote, but it would be a good thing, don't you think?
I know that bounty manager could not know if the project will be successful or not, who would know that? that does not know even the founder, but some scams could be seen from the first point, and I would advise everyone to skip promotion on those projects
when something is fishy in the project, it is not without a reason
I see nothing wrong with that as long as they're trusted and were able to handle their projects well, it's fine if they support other projects. Most bounty managers these days are handling different projects so it will be hard for them to promote and support a single project so they have the freedom to choose.
CryptopreneurBrainboss wearing BestChange signature.
pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.
Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.
I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/brainboss-escrow-managerial-service-ann-signature-bounty-5124215
It could be simply to avoid any conflict of interest. Otherwise BM would have to grade himself on a weekly basis.pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.
Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.
I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/brainboss-escrow-managerial-service-ann-signature-bounty-5124215
But lets be honest, BTC campaign will always be more sought after than altcoin campaigns.
I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.What about post count?
I don't understand why you have to bring what board this is posted.
Quote
You guys dragging in signature managers here, huh... why.
That's because Brainboss and pakhitheboss are also altcoin bounty managers wearing a signature that's paid in BTC.Quote
The signature campaign managers you dragging in (Hhampuz, CryptopreneurBrainboss and other signature are so known, reputable for signature and surely they open thread for bounty, that is not what this thread try to discuss.
What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.
With the exception of Hhampuz who doesn't apply for signature campaigns paid in BTC, the other campaign managers applied in another campaign while managing a bounty so they can also answer questions that you asked. Don't you think they are the best people to respond here or are they exempted because you're afraid of what they have to say? Don't cower now after boldly making this post.What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.
......
btcltcdigger's response is not politicizing your thread. He is also a bounty manager by the way.
Bounty managers run more than one crypto project to manage, so they can’t wear all of their signatures you know? They have the right to choose which signature would they like to wear despite managing multiple campaigns. It’s their choice and you have to respect that, as they don’t just focus on one income source only.
Then what should a bounty manager do, if he manages 2 or more campaign? Wear half of each projects signature? Wear one signature on odd days, and other on even? I think bounty managers are free to support anything they want in their signature. Same as people that work on Coca-Cola factory. They can drink what ever they want. Of course it will be funny if Pepsi worker drinks Coca-Cola during his shifts. But if he get a warning for not being loyal, he can simply sue Pepsi for that.
The point is that signature campaign is organized and every one can see that. There should be clean up in bounty and not to run off to wear signature and get paid in bitcoin and they are able to convert, do whatever they want with it weekly as there sweat.
A good example is the bounty going with Murat, one of the most trusted. The reward is weekly that is also in his wallet as escrowed. And the project is already existing, and trading in three different exchanges.
Thread is below. Such projects in bounty section will time will organize the section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5313677
I still dont get it. Being bounty manager is just work. It is not obligatory to wear signature of a project you manage. What if Bounty manager really supports what is in his signature. If you work in McDonalds, their food should not be the only one you should eat.
I'm sure this situation is not about money or because Bitcoins/altcoins being easier to receive/convert/spend. Even if a project they manage pays more in tokens, and they are traded, I wont be the that sure that bounty manager would immediately switch his btc/eth/usdt signature to token/coin one.
MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING
This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
OP thinks that bounty managers can demand from the team to pay in BTC or USDT for all the participants but why they should do when people are available to work for free?This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
Only if a bounty hunter changes the manager will be forced to change or else nothing is going to be changed.
Well, this depends upon their agreement, so to sum up, Bounty Managers here in the forum are just also like us Sig Participants.
MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING
This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
OP thinks that bounty managers can demand from the team to pay in BTC or USDT for all the participants but why they should do when people are available to work for free?This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
Only if a bounty hunter changes the manager will be forced to change or else nothing is going to be changed.
MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING
This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.
I dont think Bounty managers should be judged for wearing a certain project's signature provided that project is not a scam.
What a user wears in their signature is their choice - just like the choice of T-shirt that you wear when going out on a party. Would you like it if someone kept telling you that the clothing is "inappropriate" or that someone like them should not wear that?
Bounty managers are not "Altcoin promoters" by any means. They are also members of this forum. The irony is only on the people who find it funny that they wear a signature that they wish to wear, paid or non-paid.
What a user wears in their signature is their choice - just like the choice of T-shirt that you wear when going out on a party. Would you like it if someone kept telling you that the clothing is "inappropriate" or that someone like them should not wear that?
Bounty managers are not "Altcoin promoters" by any means. They are also members of this forum. The irony is only on the people who find it funny that they wear a signature that they wish to wear, paid or non-paid.
Signature and avatar are a personal space given by Bitcointalk to all ranking members. A member can become a bounty manager and use his personal space to promote his existing project or promote another. It is his/her personal choice. Some projects make it mandatory for the bounty manager to put their signature and avatar and some don't.
And do you think that the campaign that you manage can be successful with the maximum? and to what extent do you care about the campaign you are managing? because a manager also has limits of concern and limits on his job as a manager. 
Signature and avatar are a personal space given by Bitcointalk to all ranking members. A member can become a bounty manager and use his personal space to promote his existing project or promote another. It is his/her personal choice. Some projects make it mandatory for the bounty manager to put their signature and avatar and some don't.
aside from that there are also managers that manages a bitcoin paying campaign but they wear other signatures that also pays in bitcoin . im not against to this but sometimes that boggles my mind . they already get paid for managing a campaign and they dont necesarily need to apply or make themselves as one of us common/regular participants .
or they can wear a signature but why not wear the signature of the company they are working with. idk why but we feel contented seeing that
or they can wear a signature but why not wear the signature of the company they are working with. idk why but we feel contented seeing that
It's familiar to me, there are many bounty managers like that, why? ... I think there are many reasons, we just keep thinking positively
1. it could be that he knows that the project he is managing is less attractive in global market and in the future
2. Bounty manager needs income for life necessities
3. Same Time with bounty he was running. etc
1. it could be that he knows that the project he is managing is less attractive in global market and in the future
2. Bounty manager needs income for life necessities
3. Same Time with bounty he was running. etc
I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.
Sure you understand the point there. The bounty manager is not going to care much about the success and reward of hunters. That is why there are many failed bounty. Except for the very few managers that have worked to be trusted.
Some bounty managers are also newbies, members, full members account. Why do we expect.
Jump to: