Topic: Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony - page 5. (Read 1026 times)
i think they have the freedom if there agreement with project they are promoting does not compulsory them to wear it, what i see in them is that they love to maximize opportunity so to me.
i think they have the freedom if there agreement with project they are promoting does not compulsory them to wear it, what i see in them is that they love to maximize opportunity so to me.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1052
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
In as much as I quite agree with you, I still believe that it's not necessarily compulsory that the bounty managers must join to promote whatever project they are managing, I mean we all are looking for a way to earn money which does not exclude the managers, and no one including the managers stops us or anyone from applying for the bitcoin paying bounties in the service section as well, so long you meet the requirements, the managers will never stop you from applying for bitcoin paying bounties, so this is to say that we all are as free as they are to promote which ever project we choose to promote, I believe that if you and I meet the requirements to be accepted in bitcoin paying bounties, we wouldn't be doing bounties in the altcoins section.
I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 
They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
...
They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
...
It not unusual to be honest, firstly they have the right to do so, secondly they may be managing more than one campaign and thirdly and being honest, many people are working in the forum in whatever is more profitable at the moment. No criticism here, I have translated and signed for another campaign myself. One other reason is to spread your risk, since many campaigns disappear into thin air for one reason or another.
*I feel it's okay and there's nothing wrong with that...
The campaign manager is the only someone who is assigned by the developer to market their product in this forum and usually, it is an agreement between the developer and BM.
The campaign manager is the only someone who is assigned by the developer to market their product in this forum and usually, it is an agreement between the developer and BM.
It is selfishness that makes those managers do that. They know that most of the bounties they manage are shit projects but because they receive payments in bitcoin from the project teams they think it is ok to promote the bounties. Bounty hunters have suffered because of this and I think that managers who manage failed projects know from the beginning that those projects were going to fail. I think it will be better for projects to insist on paying whoever that manages them in the projects token. May be those who manage this forum should make a rule to effect this.
~snip~
What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.
Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.
Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.
What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.
Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.
Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.
This has been discussed for a long time and is the big hope of bounty participants.
But, you have to understand why they're running the campaign? Startup projects generally don't own and try to collect more valuable altcoins as more important development caps, especially for listing and operational costs, and hiring some professional workers.If I were a team, I also understand that hiring random people who aren't necessarily marketing professionals (bounty participants) has a low level of effectiveness. That's why I only offer my own new, under-valued altcoin as a "guarantee" of proper payments.
If you have the special professionalism they need, of course they'd hire you and will be paid more properly.
I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why
They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.
They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.
Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.
They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.
Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.
If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...
And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better
And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol
I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha
I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern
The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol
Well i think due to competition in the bounty management niche the bounty managers have to offer less fee to win the campaign so because they are not making enough from managing a campaign they are free to join and promote a project that seem attractive to them but yes it is kind of funny but it is a fact. They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?
They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.
They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.
Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.
They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.
Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.
If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...
And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better
And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol
I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha
I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern
The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol
it is not an obligation for bounty managers to wear the same signature they are managing, of course it would be nice and a further sign of trust but it is not an obligation
.... because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.
Can somebody please verify? My knowledge on this is members can fit in two or more signatures depending on the size or the number of characters.
I do not think that you are totally right. If you watch some of them, particularly the legendary members,you will realized some of them wear signature campaign of some services they had a long time partnership with even before they decide to manage a bounty campaign. Secondly, everyone know that getting payment in bitcoin is the best rather than token that you are not sure it will even get listed. So I believe taking part in bitcoin paid services and also managing campaign is a good decision which I am sure you will also partake if you are given the chance. Lastly, managers have term and conditions for accepting a campaign and if wearing the project signature is not part of the agreement, I do not see reason why he/she should wear the signature when he/she can make use of the space for something else
The bounty manager has the right to use any signature because he only manages it, maybe more pay means that the manager intends to use the company's signature, therefore every participant must have the post quality that the manager wants, so this is the manager's choice when the btc paid bounty campaign is held. run.
I just think that every manager is always different, but their job is very professional. That is what I admit that they are looking for quality, not just a jump to find a bigger $$, sometimes participants like that, the manager doesn't like it.
I just think that every manager is always different, but their job is very professional. That is what I admit that they are looking for quality, not just a jump to find a bigger $$, sometimes participants like that, the manager doesn't like it.
Then what should a bounty manager do, if he manages 2 or more campaign? Wear half of each projects signature? Wear one signature on odd days, and other on even? I think bounty managers are free to support anything they want in their signature. Same as people that work on Coca-Cola factory. They can drink what ever they want. Of course it will be funny if Pepsi worker drinks Coca-Cola during his shifts. But if he get a warning for not being loyal, he can simply sue Pepsi for that.
The point is that signature campaign is organized and every one can see that. There should be clean up in bounty and not to run off to wear signature and get paid in bitcoin and they are able to convert, do whatever they want with it weekly as there sweat.
A good example is the bounty going with Murat, one of the most trusted. The reward is weekly that is also in his wallet as escrowed. And the project is already existing, and trading in three different exchanges.
Thread is below. Such projects in bounty section will time will organize the section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5313677
Some time I am very funny looking with bounty manager campaign using other signature based on what his bounty campaign manage, I think he still looking for much money from other bounty campaign because almost bounty manager not independent with his bounty manage, just few bounty campaign manager never take part for joining other bounty campaign and better use empty signature on his account.
on the plus side maybe it's his way of taking every part. and he didn't want to be left behind. Especially with the bitcoin signature, it's definitely a matter of pride (if that's me). showing off what she's wearing, like we're applying for a job at a Coca-Cola store wearing Pepsi-branded clothes. will it be laughed at?
I am neutral, I will not say something that I have not experienced, because I cannot be a bounty manager yet, so I appreciate whatever he does.
I am neutral, I will not say something that I have not experienced, because I cannot be a bounty manager yet, so I appreciate whatever he does.
I think the moment a bounty manager launches a new campaign on the forum, he already promotes it, it matters not if he wears their signature or not, but by basically making the campaign open for others to advertise in and around the forum the campaign manager is by extension telling us all that he has done research on the said project and considers it good for advertisement. And as such if any user finds something wrong with the project, a report is immediately made to the manager to close the campaign, that's the reason why bounty managers face quite a lot of criticism when bounties/campaigns go wrong.
Thus what I'm saying is that you can be less concerned with whatever signature your BM wears, it's their signature after all, and they can only advertise one company at a time on it, but can advertise so many more by just overseeing their different campaigns, what's more important is the reputation of the BM in question and not what's on his signature.
Thus what I'm saying is that you can be less concerned with whatever signature your BM wears, it's their signature after all, and they can only advertise one company at a time on it, but can advertise so many more by just overseeing their different campaigns, what's more important is the reputation of the BM in question and not what's on his signature.
I have met bounty managers who carried signature with payment in bitcoins and at the same time conducted campaigns in which the payment was also in bitcoins, only slightly higher. I think it's right that they don't jump from one signature to another if the payment in one of them is higher, and continue to carry the signature if they joined it earlier.
Bounty managers are hired to manage campaigns, I guess this depends on the bounty manager and the team's agreement whether if they will require the manager to wear the signature and be part of the promotion, or they are just there to check the quality of posts and count the posts each participants has made to be eligible for payment, then submit the report to the team for payment.
Some managers are hired to manage multiple projects at the same time and it will be impossible for them to wear all this signature at a time. I see nothing wrong with managers wearing a different signature from what they are managing.
Some managers are hired to manage multiple projects at the same time and it will be impossible for them to wear all this signature at a time. I see nothing wrong with managers wearing a different signature from what they are managing.
As a matter of fact not everyone cares, bounty managers may decide to promote other project that's different from the one they are managing, there is no rule that bounty managers must not promote other projects when they are managing another, they are going to get paid managing the bounty that's their job, whichever project they plan to promote is non of the teams business
Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.
Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.
I don't quite understand this because is it not the whole point of wearing the signature? To promote the project?
As a campaign manager, I don't find it ironic at all for them to wear the signature. After all, you are running a campaign which ensures that its participants will successfully promote the said project and by wearing the signature, you help in promoting.
Regarding the dynamics on the reward, the usually depends on the project and their developers. If you are developing a token, then its likely for you to give out payments as the tokens itself because you strongly believe in the potential of their project. It's sort of like giving out shares for the company. Whether or not the token gains value of course will depend on the success of the project and developers. Most btc campaigns are not token based, these are mixers and gambling sites etc. so they don't have their own tokens to give out thus the rewards are in btc.
Jump to: