Topic: Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony - page 6. (Read 1083 times)

Then what should a bounty manager do, if he manages 2 or more campaign? Wear half of each projects signature? Wear one signature on odd days, and other on even? I think bounty managers are free to support anything they want in their signature. Same as people that work on Coca-Cola factory. They can drink what ever they want. Of course it will be funny if Pepsi worker drinks Coca-Cola during his shifts. But if he get a warning for not being loyal, he can simply sue Pepsi for that.

That was also my wondering question before, Why the Bounty Manager has not worn the signature of the bounty campaign that they handled, But that was only out of ignorance because I figure out why and it's simple it's their own choices to wear the signature or not because they only paid to manage that particular Bounty campaign and not by wearing on that project signature. which is the role of the signature campaign participants simple as that.

yeah, they do not have to support project which promote, but it would be a good thing, don't you think?
I know that bounty manager could not know if the project will be successful or not, who would know that? that does not know even the founder, but some scams could be seen from the first point, and I would advise everyone to skip promotion on those projects

when something is fishy in the project, it is not without a reason

Hello guys, please lets not make mess of this thread. We can read the page again to really get the intent ,gist and dynamics of the post and not politicize it or count post with it. I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.

You guys dragging in signature managers here, huh... why.

The signature campaign managers you dragging in (Hhampuz, CryptopreneurBrainboss and other signature are so known, reputable for signature and surely they open thread for bounty, that is not what this thread try to discuss.

What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.

Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.

Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.

Love the discussion here, OP do understand that the service been hire here is my management skills and not my signature privilege. My signature space is a privilege and I can use it to advertise whatever I want not minding what project I'm currently overseeing their promotion on the forum. Beside most of us were already working for the project we're currently advertising on our signature space before the bounties came along, you don't just expect us to dump them when they're quite high quality and have very decent payment.

I personally have been offer deals for my space by some campaign I have managed (to be paid fully in whatever coin I want including theirs) but I choose not to accept that offer to avoid unnecessary scenario. For now I don't think it is idea I manage myself but probably in future that'll come into the picture. Bounty manager aren't linked to the success of a project which is why investing or joining a campaign just because of the reputation of the manager isn't advice.

We can do all our due diligence and still the project would end up not been successful or scamming their investors. The most important thing is that our promoters we hired get paid which is why an escrow is always recommended.

That's a funny thing but I can see your point. I didn't think they would be bound by the same rules of the bounty campaign since they are the one in charge.

Can somebody please verify? My knowledge on this is members can fit in two or more signatures depending on the size or the number of characters.

of course that depend of their desire , its a common thing i guess, even for veteran manager like hampuz or yahoo. sometimes they just created bounty without using that signature and even they have own signature to paying who use that signature, its doesn't mean they managed the scam project or something like that since it can damage their reputation. so the point is , don't look manager do such thing , look their reputation first before joined a bounty program. u know what, i've joined many many bounty with different types of managers, and mostly, i just got nothing from manager who also using the same signature as they managed.

One bounty manager can promote multiple campaigns at once so how they can support all the projects at once? because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.

Bounty manager also hired by the team to managed the participants and calculate stakes if bounty wants the manager to wear the signature then they may wear it for appropriate payment but as far as I know most bounty managers work for partial BTC payment and remaining in their tokens and no bounties fall under this category may not get interested by them.

I have seen a lot of managers while holding bounties but they are using other project avatars as long as I know it is a permissible action because there are no rules at all regarding the bounty manager who must use the bounty he handle so I thought it wasn't funny because one bounty manager can hold handle many bounty

It could be simply to avoid any conflict of interest. Otherwise BM would have to grade himself on a weekly basis.
But lets be honest, BTC campaign will always be more sought after than altcoin campaigns.

CryptopreneurBrainboss wearing BestChange signature.
pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.

Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.

I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/brainboss-escrow-managerial-service-ann-signature-bounty-5124215

Nothing prevents a bounty manager from wearing the avatar and signature of another project, sometimes a bounty manager handles some of the projects he manages, so for me it doesn't matter.

It was the team's decision to let the BM manager wear signature what he wants to wear. And for sure, they have agreed with the terms and conditions, of course, if I have already in the BTC signature campaign and some ask me to run a bounty program (legit) offering high service fees and wanting to change the signature in support of their project, I have to accept it provided that they will pay in BTC every week. But I feel it was not the deal they've talked about. Pretty Irony, yeah, but this is about money, and they are safe with the BTC payment campaign.

You do know that if it weren't for the bounty managers (the trusted ones), it wouldn't be safe to participate in it? There are many cases in which the bounty providers control it, and then when bounty hunters have done the tasks, they skip on you and never pay you with what you have done.

Anyway, it will depend on the bounty manager on what he will do with his signature space. Some will be paying for a higher amount for the fees managing their campaigns with signature space, but mostly, it's not in their intention. If they can afford to pay it, I don't think they should be locked into one because he is handling it.

For sure, they would background check the company, etc, if it's reputable or not. They wouldn't directly be advertising it for sure.

It's the manager prerogative to wear the signature they have been given the task too. Of course they will choose a more rewarding or satisfying compensation, this is a common sense I think. If you are a manager then you get a contract for handling campaign, usually you'll go for a regular signature that pays fiat or bitcoin.

Not saying his not supporting the project he handled but he is just commission to do the bounty service nothing more btt of course they make sure the project is legit so it wouldn't do bad record on their portfolio.

I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.

Being a bounty manager does not mean you have to necessarily support the said project. Some people simply want to do business and do not care that much about the bounty projects they manage - if the projects turn into scams, it's the image of the managers that gets tainted.

Moreover, bounties are short-term so if they were to wear signatures of the bounties they managed,
 1. they cannot wear multiple sigs at the same time so they can only choose 1 project to support
 2. after a short timespan, they will have to look for a new deal

Bitcoin sig campaigns are usually running long-term (at least the successful ones). They're "safer", if you will.

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.

They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.

Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.

They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.

Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.

If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...

And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better

And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol

I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha 

I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol