BOUNTY PAYMENT MATTERS - page 18. | Bitcointalksearch.org

shinratensei_

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 1029

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Valzador on February 29, 2020, 12:55:44 PM

Your idea is good, but if we look at it from the perspective of the project owner, of course, it is very detrimental because they have to pay the campaign manager too. The use of escrow for bounty payments, in my opinion, is appropriate to prevent garbage campaigns. The price issue is another matter.

When they were running the bounty campaign and they must pay the bounty manager too but in this case, they are paying the campaign manager use their token.

Quote from: DabsPoorVersion on February 29, 2020, 02:40:30 PM

This idea is unnecessary,

Bounty hunters are participating in bounty campaigns at their own risk, bounty hunters are responsible to investigate the project they become part. If this idea was implemented it will be the same as how signature campaign on services section works, everything will change including the number of participants they can accept due to their financial ability.

It's not caused by this is an unnecessary idea but this idea is almost impossible to be implemented into the bounty campaign (altcoin) as the majority of those new projects have no financial ability to pay the hunters at first or at least deposit some percentage of the total allocation to the escrow.

Quote from: ?? on ??

A very important suggestion that might benefit all those who like to join such
Programs and I wish hunters find solutions for the payments issues as soon as possible.

If the developer will always stand with their decision and the solution will never be reached as there was no deal between the developer and hunters.

Ailmand

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 519

Coindragon.com 30% Cash Back

It's a good suggestion, however, take note that the forum is not created mainly for bounty hunting. The purpose of this forum is for users to share fresh ideas and new projects related to crypto. Bounties are just additional for those projects who would like to promote their project and those who will join are given free-will to do so aware of the risk of not getting paid or not getting anything from what they are promoting.

I also have been into a lot of projects and have stayed in bounties for several months before, and forum moderators have no total control over developers not paying bounty participants since anyone is free to promote to project without requirements from the forum. It is all up to participants to make their own research to weigh the legitimacy of a project before joining.

daniahya

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 1000

I think it is difficult to carry out this idea because all the projects on average they are looking for funds to develop the project, how can they pay bounty hunters if they themselves are looking for funds for the project, actually bounty hunters can find payments with bitcoin but the rules are very difficult

qazgroup

member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 20

RiveMont

Yes, someone from the forum administration or a senior member can be an escrow the second option that has been a demand by hunters for long is that bounty payments should be in usdt or btc or eth as it will be win-win for all parties and will also eliminate the bounty dumping allegations also it will make hunters happy and more will join this industry as it will become truly rewarding with such policies.

DabsPoorVersion

sr. member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 315

www.Artemis.co

This idea is unnecessary,

Bounty hunters are participating in bounty campaigns at their own risk, bounty hunters are responsible to investigate the project they become part. If this idea was implemented it will be the same as how signature campaign on services section works, everything will change including the number of participants they can accept due to their financial ability.

princerepon

full member

Activity: 994

Merit: 101

It's so sad when bounty hunters didn't get paid for their work. I can understand that pain as a bounty hunter. Now days it's so rare to see a good quality project, if there is found some one they offer so little amount (like penny) to bounty hunter for their work. In my opinion Escrow is the best option for bounty payment. And hunters should join that project which are hire by escrow for payment otherwise it's good idea to leave that project.

In that case project team will thought if BM scam there coin then (if BM escrow in that case)..? Well then good, trustworthy and reputed BM hiring is the best choice for that. If they are really care about their project then it's not a big thing for them i guess. If project team thought that bounty payment will dump there coin then they can arrange some step, like monthly payment (of course under four months).

Actually there is always a solution for every problem. But it's depend on people that they want it or not. Last past two years was really unexpected for bounty hunters. Hope this year will be profitable year for bounty hunters.

Valzador

hero member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 503

Your idea is good, but if we look at it from the perspective of the project owner, of course, it is very detrimental because they have to pay the campaign manager too. The use of escrow for bounty payments, in my opinion, is appropriate to prevent garbage campaigns. The price issue is another matter.

angrybirdy

sr. member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 277

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: gaston castano on February 29, 2020, 12:41:35 PM

I think it will be difficult, because their project may not be successful and get a softcap.
coupled with prices that might come down by bounty hunters after receiving their payment.
so this idea will be a little detrimental to the dev I think regardless of the goodness of the project.

Aside from that reason,
Most of the bounty projects started with having no funds, for this reason, how are they able to pay a certain amount of funds. They are getting their allocation for the bounty payment from the funds they collected. It will be hard to initiate this kind of plan.

gaston castano

sr. member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 251

I think it will be difficult, because their project may not be successful and get a softcap.
coupled with prices that might come down by bounty hunters after receiving their payment.
so this idea will be a little detrimental to the dev I think regardless of the goodness of the project.

Zeke_23

sr. member

Activity: 868

Merit: 333

It would be wise if this is how bounty campaign works in the very beginning.
But sad to say that it is impossible since this forum or the admins/moderators is not responsible to filter each and every project for the sake of bounty hunters. It is bounty hunters' responsibility to find a better campaign and avoid the scams.

ansi

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 254

ICO business is almost dead man, now it's time for the IEO which killed the bounty business.
A crypto project do not need so much marketing now, all it has to do is listing it's IEO into one decent exchange & that's it, the user base of that exchange if the best marketing it can get.

It so hard that you'll find an ICO that puts his tokens in a escrow wallet, that's why people aren't willing to invest in ICO anymore, they prefer buying it when it hit the exchanges instead.

CryptopreneurBrainboss

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 4282

eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.

Quote from: BayAngelo on February 29, 2020, 08:46:59 AM

Will it be wise if this forum put up a request that ALL NEW PROJECTS EXPECTING TO RUN BOUNTIES SHOULD PAY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FUNDS BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY BOUNTY OR run an ESCROW.
The fund will be use to settle hunters should incase project owners Refuse to pay hunters Or decides to play tricks with hunters payment after a successful bounty campaign.

First and foremost, the forum doesn't regulate (moderate) signature or bounty campaign therefore they're not responsible for making promoters of such projects get paid after a successful promotion. It's your duty as a promoter to do your personal research and also set sine guidelines to prevent you from falling victims if these scammers.

Don't promote project that don't have escrow funds or unrealistic goals or ideas like those setting imaginary price for their token that isn't even listed on exchanges or done with their crowdfunding. You can even take it a step further by only promoting project willing to pay you in well established cryptocurrency like bitcoin.

mersal

member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 38

Scams are not moderated here so it will be not possible to make such rule from the forum administration but why bounty hunters join on such projects,let the bounty team look for hunters,make demand for yourself first then only your voice will get attention here.

kaya11

full member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 110

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

Maybe it is possible if this is pushed through and many hunters would support it. The only thing that bugs me is that of how much is the intitial payment of the hunters? Would it be bitcoins or eths or the likes? I know it will be little but it will give fuel for those who keep on hunting even just for pennies. This is a good idea because hunters of course would be tagged if they refused to their jobs given the initial payment is sent.

serjent05

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 1280

Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS

I believe this all goes down to the campaign manager. The forum has nothing to do about the bounty campaign nor it runs it.

Bounty payments should be secured by the bounty manager. It should be one of his responsibility as the one who manages the campaign. The bounty manager can act as an escrow and at the same time the campaign manager and I see nothing wrong with that. It is for the interest of all the party, project owner removing themselves from the burden of bounty reward distribution, the campaign manager making sure that the participants are getting paid and participants were reassured that the payment is in an escrow hand.

This thing will only be difficult if the project owner has no intention of paying the bounty participants or the manager himself wanted to scam the participants.

BitcoinPanther

hero member

Activity: 1918

Merit: 564

Actually, I already have that in mind but I am still thinking how feasible it is. We should be thinking about how it will protect the Bounty Hunters' interest at the same time protecting the Project Team.

1. The Project Team should have a minimum allotment for individual insurance for the bounty hunter.
2. The Bounty Hunter should comply with the requirements given by the Project Team to claim the insurance tokens or coins.

There will be technicalities about how to claim the coins/tokens so there are no bogus accounts that can claim other's rewards. I think ESCROW and third party high reputable team should handle the said funds.

cytpoway121

member

Activity: 1540

Merit: 68

Quote from: BayAngelo on February 29, 2020, 08:46:59 AM

Will it be wise if this forum put up a request that ALL NEW PROJECTS EXPECTING TO RUN BOUNTIES SHOULD PAY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FUNDS BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY BOUNTY OR run an ESCROW.
The fund will be use to settle hunters should incase project owners Refuse to pay hunters Or decides to play tricks with hunters payment after a successful bounty campaign. For over a long period, hunters has been crying and wailing about successful campaigns that has refused to make payment. there are new campaigns on-going and more projects will run bounty campaigns sooner or later. the issue of payment is still a lingering problem here with No solid profound solution. Apart from the fact that some projects has the ANN Thread labelled as SCAMS, it is still do not offer solutions to payments.

the idea above is just a suggestion.. we all hope that a perfect solution will solve this issue of projects refusing to settle hunters here and will promote this platform.

I do not know much as regards if the forum can do that.
And that's why there are terms and conditions regarding payments on every ieo Bounties

Join escrowed Bounties
Dyor on unescrowed Bounties.

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1003

The implementation of this rule will save the time of bounty hunters but I doubt this suggestion will pass in this way. Some modifications are surely required, the $ worth is the main case here. No one will want to waste the valuable time for small bounty allocation, so it is all connected in circle. Breaking this chain doesn't look like possible in a single step.

watergold

sr. member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 251

Quote from: FairUser on February 29, 2020, 10:06:41 AM

Well, if bounty accepts this rule then I believe we will never see any scam projects in this market. All bounty hunters will receive their money after completing the mission. But that is impossible because no new project will accept it. The scam and denial of payment will continue and continue in the future

Yeah surely there will be many who reject the rules like this fraudulent project will not want to use the rules of this forum so they will use what they want or use another platform.
It seems like the bounties will be at peace if there are rules like this.

White Christmas

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 258

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: FairUser on February 29, 2020, 10:06:41 AM

Well, if bounty accepts this rule then I believe we will never see any scam projects in this market. All bounty hunters will receive their money after completing the mission. But that is impossible because no new project will accept it. The scam and denial of payment will continue and continue in the future

The thing is it would be hard time to find first a bounty campaign that will follow those kind of payment rules because as of no I can say that bounty is dead in which there are a lot of bounty out there but still no one cares to join it because they are traumatic on what happened way back then. If this policy will be implemented in which after the bounty hunters finish their job on promoting the project then they will already have the payment to their job and I can say that it really matters.

Topic: BOUNTY PAYMENT MATTERS - page 18. (Read 1934 times)