Topic: BOUNTY PAYMENT MATTERS - page 7. (Read 1934 times)
Well, as we all believe, we are still in the wild west in cryptocurrency. We are not outlawed by mainstream finance, but nevertheless not really regulated which is the main reason why people love to invest in cryptocurrencies. Those who can get away with it will do everything to get away with other peoples investment. That also includes some mismanagement in the administration of bounty projects and bounty campaigns. We can be paid big or not at all. They can say the project is not successful even if they got so much money. They can be honest or they can scam everybody. If you want bounties in decentralized crypto to be regulated with the help of the forum owner then I would wish you the best of luck.
Bounty manager together with the administration of the forum could to do it, but I doubt that they care.
if the distribution is done by the project itself, the bounty manager cannot do anything, but if the bounty manager holds coins or tokens from the project, they will do their best, like Bounty Detective, because KingCasino is a scam, they can still distribute the KCT to the bounty hunterPercussion KCT is distributed if the project is scam meaning it will not be useful in the token.
Bounty manager together with the administration of the forum could to do it, but I doubt that they care.
if the distribution is done by the project itself, the bounty manager cannot do anything, but if the bounty manager holds coins or tokens from the project, they will do their best, like Bounty Detective, because KingCasino is a scam, they can still distribute the KCT to the bounty hunter 
Good idea, friend, but I think the bounty team does not agree because they need their tokens until they reach the market and succeed first. to pay at the beginning, maybe the team will think a thousand times because they definitely think at the end they don't have the certainty that their token will succeed or not. on the contrary, the condition actually benefits the participants because there is already a certainty at the beginning that they as participants have already been paid. If it's my idea, pay half of it first, or register the token first on the exchange. so that participants will be calmer with the existence of some of these certainty.
now some managers already use escrow services and will certainly reduce the sense of bounty hunter fears for payers. maybe in the future all bounty managers will do the same
Right now many bounty managers have started using escrow services and provide a guarantee regarding the payment distribution. As well some of the Mangers have come with the rule of a limited number of participants for the greater reward in bounty campaigns. So basically things are changing right now. 
now some managers already use escrow services and will certainly reduce the sense of bounty hunter fears for payers. maybe in the future all bounty managers will do the same
I have seen a lot of bounty use escrow, but it is not really successful either. Many projects are still dead and not listed on exchanges, and bounty hunters only receive useless tokens 
Bounty manager together with the administration of the forum could to do it, but I doubt that they care.
No. They don't.
This issue was raised several times before, during the last 2-3 years. So I don't think that there is any point in beating the dead horse again. So ultimately, it is up to the bounty hunters. They need to decide whether they want to join such campaigns or not. In my case, I decided to quit the bounties almost two years ago. Unless the conditions are changed, I am not going to rejoin.
Good idea ,however its hard to do it now its been a habbit since the beggining of ICO it will be harder for new project to follow that kind of rules.
Besides the thrend of ICO is ended you can see it in bounty section that only few project started thier own ICO .
The better option for bounty is do it dual option paid tokens and paid the other half with bitcoin or eth.i remember there is project doing that before, so bounty hunters will never ending up nothing to recieve after the success of ICO.
That is really a good idea to have a dual option but i think the project team will not agree with it except if it become rules to be follow on this forum for the sake of the hunters. If this will happen the hunters will gain even a little if ever the tokens become no value at the end of the campaign or if it turns scam project. Besides the thrend of ICO is ended you can see it in bounty section that only few project started thier own ICO .
The better option for bounty is do it dual option paid tokens and paid the other half with bitcoin or eth.i remember there is project doing that before, so bounty hunters will never ending up nothing to recieve after the success of ICO.
You could reduce the chance of being tricked to do all the bounty work for free cause the project team refuses to make a payment. First, don't join bounty management by the project team since they can do anything they want with your payment. Second, don't focus only on high bounty rewards and overlook the first or project's reputation.
Is the project worth anything that hunters are busy campaigning for it? The answer is No, but bounty hunters are doing most of this alts campaign in the hope it will become valuable some day, so the idea that this project are ask to escrow the bounty pool is not a bad idea, it is better than having to deal with their constant excuses to not pay hunters at the end of the campaign.
Reason @Hhampuz outstands every other BM currently in the forum he escrows most of the bounty campaigns he manages. Escrow is escrow for a reason, the teams wouldn't be playing with the emotions and feelings of over a thousand hunters feigning payment and making promises when the required works have been done successfully already.
It is a good one but I think when this kind of bounty payment is settle then they would only go with the ones who are already trusted and known to have a good reputation on the forum.
I wonder why this kind of bounty isn't showing up yet and I hope that they would also limit their participants so the bounty rewards wouldn't be so small.
I wonder why this kind of bounty isn't showing up yet and I hope that they would also limit their participants so the bounty rewards wouldn't be so small.
I wish we can do more damages to projects that take advantage of bounty hunters without paying their for their services, some team are inhuman and heartless, before the bounty campaign ends they will pretend as if bounty hunters matters but after bounty ends they will change.
Our bounty managers should be the ones to come together and consider escrow to any new projects that seems for bounty hunters skills, too many projects are fucking bounty hunters up, look what bitwings is doing to bounty hunters presently, after a while year of waiting they are now randomly picking them
Is the coin worth anything presently? I gave up on the project when they couldn't deliver what they promised.
Is the project worth anything that hunters are busy campaigning for it? The answer is No, but bounty hunters are doing most of this alts campaign in the hope it will become valuable some day, so the idea that this project are ask to escrow the bounty pool is not a bad idea, it is better than having to deal with their constant excuses to not pay hunters at the end of the campaign.
Will it be wise if this forum put up a request that ALL NEW PROJECTS EXPECTING TO RUN BOUNTIES SHOULD PAY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FUNDS BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY BOUNTY OR run an ESCROW.
The fund will be use to settle hunters should incase project owners Refuse to pay hunters Or decides to play tricks with hunters payment after a successful bounty campaign. For over a long period, hunters has been crying and wailing about successful campaigns that has refused to make payment. there are new campaigns on-going and more projects will run bounty campaigns sooner or later. the issue of payment is still a lingering problem here with No solid profound solution. Apart from the fact that some projects has the ANN Thread labelled as SCAMS, it is still do not offer solutions to payments.
the idea above is just a suggestion.. we all hope that a perfect solution will solve this issue of projects refusing to settle hunters here and will promote this platform.
The fund will be use to settle hunters should incase project owners Refuse to pay hunters Or decides to play tricks with hunters payment after a successful bounty campaign. For over a long period, hunters has been crying and wailing about successful campaigns that has refused to make payment. there are new campaigns on-going and more projects will run bounty campaigns sooner or later. the issue of payment is still a lingering problem here with No solid profound solution. Apart from the fact that some projects has the ANN Thread labelled as SCAMS, it is still do not offer solutions to payments.
the idea above is just a suggestion.. we all hope that a perfect solution will solve this issue of projects refusing to settle hunters here and will promote this platform.
This Fenomena that most often occurs and all hope to have a solution at least there is a reward with the principle of propriety there in terms of promoting a platform like you say above.
Of course we should make a movement if a project don't want to give tokens of the bounty hunter. We should made a article about their scamming behaviour. Because there is fake team and they can scam at anytime.
The fate of bounty has yet to be confirmed clearly many fraudsters and projects don't pay the bounty hunter hard work, I personally have experienced this but now it's a little different there are some bounty managers using the Escrow system and avoiding scam
Our bounty managers should be the ones to come together and consider escrow to any new projects that seems for bounty hunters skills, too many projects are fucking bounty hunters up, look what bitwings is doing to bounty hunters presently, after a while year of waiting they are now randomly picking them
Is the coin worth anything presently? I gave up on the project when they couldn't deliver what they promised.
now some managers already use escrow services and will certainly reduce the sense of bounty hunter fears for payers. maybe in the future all bounty managers will do the same
Bounty manager together with the administration of the forum could to do it, but I doubt that they care.
This is a good suggestion! Maybe we should give importance all bounty hunters because they are really helped campaign to promote their projects. Not only because bounty pool have a small percentage of total allocation, the bounty hunters are useless. I think this is a good idea to require incoming new projects to give an advance fund before entering here in this forum to secure bounty hunters privilege to earn their rewards for hardworking if Incase the project or campaign are scam.
Of course, we should or I mean these developers should give importance they are the life of their project they move the project and present it, to investors, they themselves are investors developers should understand this, without bounty hunters majority of the projects will just fail for lack of awareness.
Jump to: