I agree that KYC is more needed for investors than for participants of generosity, and I think it's right when warned at the beginning of the company about the passage of KYC.
Today there is a real choice where you can choose Bounty Company without registering KYC. But here no one will give a guarantee that this will be a really promising project. 
Topic: Bouty and KYC - page 7. (Read 2855 times)
I agree that KYC is more needed for investors than for participants of generosity, and I think it's right when warned at the beginning of the company about the passage of KYC.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
As for me, this is unnecessary. I do not like revealing my trusty data. It is dangerous. It will never be 100% whether ICO is not a scam and your data is not sold out ... With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
The thing is that a lot of projects are clueless about the potential issues when "giving" away their tokens without knowing where those tokens actually go. So a lot of times this revelation comes in the middle of the campaign or at the end when they realize that everything is not that easy.
Thats a new reality, KYC everywhere due to regulations.
Yes it is obvious these days that most projects now want bounty hunters to fill kyc before withdrawing token. It is good because it will help them to get rid of scammers and those with multiple accounts.
Apparently almost all Bounty companies will soon be demanding the provision of personal data. Perhaps it really is a requirement of the state that the ico company should report how coins are realized.
unfortunately, in such a situation there is always a chance that our data will reach fraudsters who can use them for their own mercenary purposes. Guarantees of bounty members do not have any
Yes it is obvious these days that most projects now want bounty hunters to fill kyc before withdrawing token. It is good because it will help them to get rid of scammers and those with multiple accounts.
Kyc is the guarantee of generous payments and reliability in the bounty ,. The percentage is much higher for those bounties that require kyc compared to those that do not require, so requesting documents is a step to trust and on this already we are smoothing out I'm impressed that the bounty is better, and it is, bounties that require kyc worth doing without hesitation, a guarantee of generous payments of 100%
I'm not afraid of providing my information for the bounty manager if needed. There are so many people who playing with us by multiply accounts. This is not fair.
Yep. KYC procedures or requirement shall be informed from the very beginning. HOwever, remember that they also have notes, basically on the general guidelines, wherein they can change some bounty rules including KYC. So I think that's where they can rebut our stand on the KYC. Secondly, there are also circumstances that lead them to require KYC even at the middle of the bounty, such as regulations under which the project or the company handling the project is functioning. So, it is also a risk for bounty hunters to accept such rules and terms in every bounty campaign.
I strongly agree with your opinion, the bounty manager must announce KYC since it was first launched by the bounty so that those who are able to meet the requirements can immediately join and those who cannot fulfill the requirements can choose another bounty, if they announce at the end of the campaign and many participants do not can fulfill the claim claim requirements then this will be a waste of work for participants
that's right, because not all bounty hunters are agree with kyc process, if the bounty hunter will not pass kyc process, they wont be able to receive their reward. that's why they should announce it first if they will undergo kyc for their project or not.
I strongly agree with your opinion, the bounty manager must announce KYC since it was first launched by the bounty so that those who are able to meet the requirements can immediately join and those who cannot fulfill the requirements can choose another bounty, if they announce at the end of the campaign and many participants do not can fulfill the claim claim requirements then this will be a waste of work for participants
In starting kyc is not imp...abd suddenly they are changing rules which are wrong...but is do for our online safety.kyc is a verification when a custmor use crypto world..it is good so no one can get your information..So i think it is better.
maybe KYC can help the projects to become scam so people and especially the investor can feel safe to invest their money with the project. but some of us do not accept if KYC is applying with the participants of the bounty campaign because they feel that they are helping the project to get success in the beginning so the project can continue to reach their goals.
am suspecting that most of this bounty managers are doing this probably to intentionally deny many bounty hunters their right of earning tokens after working for them and its very unfair, KYC should be stated at the beginning of any bounty program and not at the end.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
this is not good and it is entirely discouraging for bounty hunters, its very unfair why they should decide to have bounty hunters go through KYC at the middle or even at the end of the program, am not in support of this.
The practice of requiring the passage of a KYC check for participants in the ICO generosity campaign is generally illegal both at the beginning of the ICO company and at its end. This check should only be carried out by investors, and the head hunters are not investors. The KYC check is designed primarily to prevent possible investments of dirty money and the fight against terrorism. What is the attitude of the participants of the ICO generosity campaign, which advertise a specific ICO project? Especially outrageous is the requirement to pass a KYC test at the end of the ICO campaign. This is generally similar to the open fraud of the ICO team and this practice must be eradicated.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
That is true. It would be unfair if the KYC will be announce after the bounty program with all the efforts and time that you've commit to that project. I would agree for the bounty manager to announce it ahead of time to receive the tokens that the bounty participants have worked on for a long period of time.
I myself think positively about Kyc as much as possible to minimize cheating. KYC or not is the decision of the development team, as a gift hunter we must follow the rules. Maybe ico asked for a kyc gift and it has nothing to do with the gift manager so don't hate them. even though I don't like KYC for bounty hunters.
Jump to: