Topic: Bouty and KYC - page 6. (Read 2855 times)
Yes, It will be very healthy if devs can mention about KYC before the start. Some members hate this and they should, therefore, be informed about it first before they get into it.
KYC is indeed effective for reducing multiple accounts. I also strongly agree if it is informed from the start, so no one will commit fraud in the bounty. And I really agree that as long as our identity is guaranteed security.
Personally, I absolutely do not mind the KYC. If the campaigns ask them to pass - it means it's not just that - it means they are obliged to do this by some legislative acts. It is advisable, of course, to know about this at the beginning of the work in the campaign, and not after its end.
I don't really like the idea of bounty for Kyc but there are some bounties we do that requires kyc and if we don't provide it, we don't get our tokens which can be disappointing. Every participant should be aware ahead whether kyc will be required or not for the project.
KYC is one of the ways for checking double entries to a particular project and also for verification purposes. I'm not against it but it should be stated in the beginning of each project because not every crypto member is comfortable with it.
When i was still very new to bounty and i had just started signature campaign. The was a project i participated in, it was after the ICO that it announced that bounty hunters should submit their details for KYC. Now, it was not as if i did not have the document to pass KYC, but because it did not announce prior to the start of the bounty, i decided not to participate in the KYC, because i did not trust their system with my details.
and for now every bounty that uses KYC must be notified when the campaign thread is posted, so that those of us who do not like KYC can avoid it and also we will not lose prizes when distributing tokens because KYC is announced when the distribution of tokens will be given 
He has a very simple motive to have a lot clients. That why they talking about KYC in the end. Firstly they right in that they can make a change in any moment.
I think kyc could be a way that bounty managers use in order to reduce the number of participants that get a reward, as it is know that a lot of people don't like being part of kyc.
I completely agree with you in the sense that you must declare even at the start of a bounty campaign to pass the KYC. But most often it does not depend on the bounty manager. Such moments are solved by the creators of the project. They can warn about confirmation of KYC only at the end of the campaign bounty, although at the beginning they were silent about it. This is the problem.
Bounty and k. Y. C which is know your customer quite compliment each know your customer helps bounty project organisers to know more it's investors and bounty hunters this is a security measures
Bullshit. KYC for investors is wether "a security measures" nor a factor for success of ICOs. The team has to be honest, not the investors, so actually it's other way round 
Bounty and k. Y. C which is know your customer quite compliment each know your customer helps bounty project organisers to know more it's investors and bounty hunters this is a security measures
i dont think its good for the bounties to be doing kyc because its just wasting of time,,futhermore most campaign will not demand for kyc at start,,but when when they now see that they cant find any means of paying the bounties,they will now requesting for kyc which is not in thw plan,,,so as for me i dont like bounty to be doing kyc
Thats the problem with most campaign managers i feel its an act of wickedness or they have their own hidden intentions to be carried out its very painful to work and go through the stress of working for weeks or sometimes months and not get paid please they should change that orientation cause its not funny
i will neve do KYC if at first i know that there will be.
this is not applicatble.
KYC is just for investors who must not invest with their respective county.
but if a bounty needs that i dont have a choice then.
this is not applicatble.
KYC is just for investors who must not invest with their respective county.
but if a bounty needs that i dont have a choice then.
KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
I agree. and also give participants the right to choose. many do not want to participate in the company where you need to pass the KYC. Announcing this at the end of the company is not an honest behavior on the part of the manager
Kyc is using for avoid money laundering .How can bounty hunter be money launderer ? he is hard working man who want to earn coins. So kyc for bounty hunters is stupid .
Right not most bounties project organisers and manager seems to me more often demanding for k. Y. C which is know your customer. We this helps them identify their customers and also know their nationality I think this is very helpful for a secure project
Issues of KYC sometimes becomes very disturbing when bounty participants are not giving a prior notice of KYC before the distribution of bounty rewards. i think from now onwards any project that requires KYC should announce it at the very beginning so that bounty participants can be aware before they participate.
I agree that KYC is more needed for investors than for participants of generosity, and I think it's right when warned at the beginning of the company about the passage of KYC.
kyc is very important because there are so many investors who participate, so the data from each investor is needed. all of the data is important because it can be one proof and reduce fraud. I agree that KYC is more needed for investors than for participants of generosity, and I think it's right when warned at the beginning of the company about the passage of KYC.
Yes, I agree with the statement that the bounty manager should announce KYC at the beginning, so that participants will better prepare it. I, as a bounty hunter, do not make KYC a problem, the important thing is that the hard work that has been done gets paid in kind, and by getting KYC data security guarantees.
Jump to: