Topic: Bouty and KYC - page 4. (Read 2855 times)
I fully agree that managers should at the very beginning to warn you that you will need KYC, and not after you have done the work
Yeah, I Also note about that and have some experiences about passing KYC for bounty. Actually, KYC is for the customers, in this case I think that it is for the investors. However, some bounty participants from some projects are also required to fulfil the KYC to get its reward. I think that since it is valuable enough for the reward, I will involve to fulfil the KYC. But, if it is suspicious and small reward, i will leave it.
Yes, it is quite important to know your customer even though it is used only for getting promotions throught social media and like this kind of way doing this promoting. It is very unique way to have security measures with staff behind projects all the above.
Really reasonable expression to take part in this all the way.
Really reasonable expression to take part in this all the way.
I really avoid bounties that have to do KYC,, and i always ask in their telegram group before joining so i always avoid bounties that require KYC,, why do i avoid 
because i don't want to give my data just to get paid,, KYC is only used by investors to keep the assets they invest,
because i don't want to give my data just to get paid,, KYC is only used by investors to keep the assets they invest, The bounty hunter is not an ICO investor, and the way to get the token is not through purchase. It is more like a promotion of employees, asking the employee for KYC is ridiculous.
But if they need KYC to expose those hunters with multiple accounts i will support it
It is a very unpleasant situation when the KYC procedure is spoken only at the end, when all the work is done. I'm not against it - but it is better if you will talk about her in the beginning - many people simply will not participate and will earn more who participated
The bounty hunter is not an ICO investor, and the way to get the token is not through purchase. It is more like a promotion of employees, asking the employee for KYC is ridiculous.
If you want to get your rewards you need to follow the rules of bounty manager or the team. A lot of bounty hunters are against about the kyc but we have no choice we need to pass our information. I know you are getting worried to give your identification but we need to trust and hope that nothing bad happens.
I think it is necessary to inform in advance about this. First I have to have a choice. That would be the right decision. In fact, I do not mind passing the KYC.
They really should announce if they are going to be using kyc for the process before people start signing up for it. Personally I would never register for a bounty that requires kyc to claim your rewards so if I did a bounty and at the end they tell me that I would need to do kyc before claiming my coins then I would feel scammed so they should always state it at the beginning of the campaign, so people know what they are getting into.
Well, KYC is something I really don't want to pass, but now I have to do that,due to regulation.
Majority of ICOs launch this kind of process and all hunters and investors are obligated to do that.
Majority of ICOs launch this kind of process and all hunters and investors are obligated to do that.
Bounty is some kind of daily work for a lot of people. I think they have a right to know if the campaign requires KYC before they start any bounty. I hate they make major changes about bounty campaigns, minor changes indeed possible.
yes I agree, the bounty manager must announce KYC at the beginning they launch a bounty campaign. because there are bounty hunters who are not willing for kyc.
Your suggestion is very good, I agree with your point of view, your article needs to be forwarded to more communities, so that more bounty managers can see!
I recently only took part in bounty campaign and passed KYC. It's easy and does not take much time. In addition, it shows that it is serious project and that it is not a scam.
Many managers do this and it seems to me sometimes it's done specifically so that as few people get their awards. There are a lot of such examples. For example, change the signature rules in the middle of the campaign and you have to go every other day and check whether the number of posts or characters has changed. The same happens with the SCC. The need to provide documents is reported suddenly and gives too little time to pass it
Rules for the ICO is currently tighter and this form to reduce acts of fraud. A lot of cheating going on so the ICO gives everyone for doing KYC. KYC process and is widely used before the participants get bounty reward. And such a process is already often done.
some introduce KYC after the calculation of steaks, and then send coins only to those who passed the KYC procedure. That's tricky...
I agree on this. KYC should be announced before the program start so as to give a heads up to participants that it will be implementing one. Also, this is in consideration of the security risks involved for the participants who will give out their KYC information which is usually confidential in nature.
Yes, as much as the investment is risky, KYC is also very risky thinking that you give your personal informations and that makes it risky though is the programs security but how about our security so it is good thing to announced before the program so people will not surprised at the end of the bounty.
This is all due to unscrupulous managers. The need for KYC is clear to everyone, but that's just why not specify its cost at the very beginning...
KYC Actually it is also good in reducing actions such as cheating by participants to be able to make less fraud happen. but on the one hand this is not good because it is our data and can be misusedJump to: